An agent-based approach to modeling online social influence

The aim of this study is to better understand social influence in online social media. Therefore, we propose a method in which we implement, validate and improve an individual behavior model. The behavior model is based on three fundamental behavioral principles of social influence from the literature: 1) liking, 2) social proof and 3) consistency. We have implemented the model using an agent-based modeling approach. The multi-agent model contains the social network structure, individual behavior parameters and the scenario that are obtained from empirical data. The model is validated by comparing the output of the multi-agent simulation with empirical data. We demonstrate the method by evaluating five versions of behavior models applied to the use case of Twitter behavior about a talent show on Dutch television.

[1]  Christos Faloutsos,et al.  Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining , 2013, ASONAM 2013.

[2]  Michael J. North,et al.  Complex adaptive systems modeling with Repast Simphony , 2013, Complex Adapt. Syst. Model..

[3]  A. Vespignani,et al.  Competition among memes in a world with limited attention , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[4]  L. Burton.  Intention , 2011 .

[5]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  To agent-based simulation from System Dynamics , 2010, Proceedings of the 2010 Winter Simulation Conference.

[6]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Zooming In: Self-Emergence of Movements in New Product Growth , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[7]  D. Watts,et al.  Influentials, Networks, and Public Opinion Formation , 2007 .

[8]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Agent-based simulation of consumer purchase decision-making and the decoy effect , 2007 .

[9]  Frank M. Bass,et al.  A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Eric Bonabeau,et al.  Agent-based modeling: Methods and techniques for simulating human systems , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  W. DeSarbo,et al.  A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models , 1995 .

[12]  Michael E. Bratman,et al.  Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason , 1991 .

[13]  R. Cialdini.  Influence: Science and Practice , 1984 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[15]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Human behavior modeling within an integrative framework , 2007 .

[16]  M. Remondino,et al.  REACTIVE AND DELIBERATIVE AGENTS APPLIED TO SIMULATION OF SOCIO-ECONOMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[17]  Peter R. Monge,et al.  Theories of Communication Networks , 2003 .

[18]  Martin Weber,et al.  Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes , 2002 .

[19]  Anand S. Rao,et al.  BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice , 1995, ICMAS.

[20]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[21]  John H. Holland,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity , 1995 .

[22]  T. Schelling.  Micromotives and Macrobehavior , 1978 .