Parsing the notion of algebraic thinking within a cognitive perspective

Abstract There is a growing consensus that algebra is an important aspect of mathematics teaching and learning and several abilities are required in order students to have successful performance in algebra. The present study uses insights from the domain of psychology to enrich what is currently known in the domain of mathematics education about the relationship of algebraic thinking with abilities involved in fundamental cognitive processes. In total, 190 students between the ages of 13–17 years old were tested through two tests. The first test addressed four types of cognitive systems which are responsible for the representation and processing of different types of relations in the environment: the spatial-imaginal, the causal-experimental, the qualitative-analytic and the verbal-propositional. The second test addressed algebraic thinking. The results support the key role of the four types of cognitive processes in students’ algebraic thinking. The results also suggest that abilities involved in the four types of cognitive processes predict algebraic thinking abilities, irrespective of the age of the students.

[1]  Vadim Andreevich Krutet︠s︡kiĭ.  The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren , 1976 .

[2]  J. Pascual-Leone.  ORGANISMIC PROCESSES FOR NEO‐PIAGETIAN THEORIES: A DIALECTICAL CAUSAL ACCOUNT OF COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT , 1987 .

[3]  J. Fauvel.  Platonic Rhetoric in Distance Learning: How Robert Record Taught the Home Learner. , 1989 .

[4]  A. Bishop.  Review of Research on Visualization in Mathematics Education. , 1989 .

[5]  A. Sfard.  On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin , 1991 .

[6]  M. Bickhard,et al.  The Mind's Staircase , 1993 .

[7]  A. Sfard,et al.  The gains and the pitfalls of reification — The case of algebra , 1994 .

[8]  M. Battista.  On Greeno's environmental/model view of conceptual domains: A spatial/geometric perspective , 1994 .

[9]  C. Forchuk,et al.  Linking research and practice. , 1994, International nursing review.

[10]  Lyn English,et al.  Analogical reasoning and the development of algebraic abstraction , 1996 .

[11]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Logical and psychological partitioning of mind: Depicting the same map? , 1998 .

[12]  Carolyn Kieran.  The changing face of school algebra , 1998 .

[13]  Laurinda C Brown,et al.  The Future of the Teaching and Learning of Algebra: The 12th ICMI Study , 2000 .

[14]  A. Su,et al.  The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics , 1932, The Mathematical Gazette.

[15]  J. Raven.  The Raven's Progressive Matrices: Change and Stability over Culture and Time , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  R. Case,et al.  Integrating concepts and tests of intelligence from the differential and developmental traditions , 2001 .

[17]  최영한,et al.  미국 NCTM의 Principles and Standards for School Mathematics에 나타난 수학과 교수,학습의 이론 , 2002 .

[18]  A. Demetriou,et al.  The development of mental processing: efficiency, working memory, and thinking. , 2002, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[19]  THE SPECIALIZED STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS AND MATHEMATICAL PERFORMANCE , 2003 .

[20]  Carolyn Kieran.  The Core of Algebra: Reflections on its Main Activities , 2004 .

[21]  Lyn English,et al.  Mathematical and analogical reasoning of young learners , 2004 .

[22]  M. Blanton,et al.  Characterizing a Classroom Practice that Promotes Algebraic Reasoning. , 2005 .

[23]  Andy Field,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[24]  L. Kyriakides,et al.  The functional and developmental organization of cognitive developmental sequences. , 2006, The British journal of educational psychology.

[25]  F. Rivera,et al.  Abduction–induction (generalization) processes of elementary majors on figural patterns in algebra , 2007 .

[26]  A. Gagatsis,et al.  The Effects of Different Modes of Representation on the Solution of One-Step Additive Problems. , 2007 .

[27]  Amy B. Ellis.  Connections Between Generalizing and Justifying: Students' Reasoning with Linear Relationships , 2007 .

[28]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Can we be intelligent about intelligence?: Why education needs the concept of plastic general ability , 2007 .

[29]  L. Radford.  Iconicity and contraction: a semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts , 2008 .

[30]  B. Pedemonte.  Argumentation and algebraic proof , 2008 .

[31]  T. Cooper,et al.  Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: Actions that support 8 year olds’ thinking , 2008 .

[32]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Modelling the structure and development of g , 2008 .

[33]  J. Fletcher,et al.  A structural model of algebra achievement: computational fluency and spatial visualisation as mediators of the effect of working memory on algebra achievement , 2009 .

[34]  Kerry Lee,et al.  The contributions of working memory and executive functioning to problem representation and solution generation in algebraic word problems , 2009 .

[35]  M. Mitchelmore,et al.  Awareness of pattern and structure in early mathematical development , 2009 .

[36]  Henry A. Kranendonk,et al.  Linking Research and Practice: The NCTM Research Agenda Conference Report. , 2010 .

[37]  Carolyn Kieran.  Overall Commentary on Early Algebraization: Perspectives for Research and Teaching , 2011 .

[38]  Lyn D. English.  Complex learning through cognitively demanding tasks , 2011 .

[39]  A. Demetriou,et al.  Educating the Developing Mind: Towards an Overarching Paradigm , 2011 .

[40]  Jinfa Cai,et al.  Early algebraization : a global dialogue from multiple perspectives , 2011 .

[41]  M. Pe,et al.  Are patterns important? An investigation of the relationships between proficiencies in patterns, computation, executive functioning, and algebraic word problems , 2011 .

[42]  A Model of Mathematical Giftedness: Integrating Natural, Creative, and Mathematical Abilities , 2011 .

[43]  D. Potari,et al.  SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ UNDERSTANDING OF MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION: STRUCTURAL CHARACTERISTICS AND THE PROCESS OF PROOF CONSTRUCTION , 2012 .

[44]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Contributions of domain-general cognitive resources and different forms of arithmetic development to pre-algebraic knowledge. , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[45]  Lyn D. English.  Analogies, Metaphors, and Images: Vehicles for Mathematical Reasoning , 2013 .

[46]  J. Mason.  Mathematical Abstraction as the Result of a Delicate Shift of Attention , 2014 .

[47]  Ana Susac,et al.  Development of abstract mathematical reasoning: the case of algebra , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[48]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Individual differences in algebraic cognition: Relation to the approximate number and semantic memory systems. , 2015, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[49]  E. Warren,et al.  Research on the Learning and Teaching of Algebra , 2016 .

[50]  Sara Weiss.  The Development Of Mental Processing Efficiency Working Memory And Thinking , 2016 .

[51]  J. Kaput.  1 What Is Algebra? What Is Algebraic Reasoning? , 2017 .