Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.

The Trophy RadioVisioGraphy model 32000 system in Normal Mode, the Trophy RVG-PC in Normal and Archive Mode, the Gendex VIXA/Visualix, the Regam Sens-A-Ray, and the Villa Flash Dent in High-Resolution Mode and Normal Mode were compared with respect to the visibility of endodontic files. Kodak Ektaspeed film served as the reference. An acrylic embedded human skull was prepared for taking radiographs with endodontic files (Kerr files size 10 and size 15) on full root length and 1.5 mm short in upper and lower premolars and molars. Possibilities for enhancement of the digital images were not studied. Receiver operating characteristics curves were derived and the areas under the curves were averaged and compared using Student's t test statistic (p < 0.05). Kodak Ektaspeed film gave acceptable results for both file sizes. Both Trophy RVG units in Normal Mode and the Regam Sens-A-Ray system gave results above the areas under the curves equals 0.95 for the size 15 files. For the size 10 files the values of the areas under the curves of all sensors systems were below this threshold. It is concluded that both RVG units in Normal Mode and the Sens-A-Ray system render a comparable result with conventional radiography in determining root canal length with the use of a size 15 files. All sensor systems were unacceptably inferior to film images when size 10 files were used.

[1]  Sanderink Gc,et al.  Imaging: new versus traditional technological aids. , 1993 .

[2]  K Horner,et al.  Quantitative assessment of a new dental imaging system. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  R. Molteni,et al.  Direct digital dental x-ray imaging with visualix/VIXA. , 1993, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[4]  U Welander,et al.  Basic technical properties of a system for direct acquisition of digital intraoral radiographs. , 1993, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[5]  K Horner,et al.  Radiovisiography for imaging root canals: an in vitro comparison with conventional radiography. , 1990, Quintessence international.

[6]  A Wenzel,et al.  Radiographic detection of occlusal caries in noncavitated teeth. A comparison of conventional film radiographs, digitized film radiographs, and RadioVisioGraphy. , 1991, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[7]  E Sonnabend,et al.  Presentation and physical evaluation of RadioVisioGraphy. , 1989, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[8]  K Horner,et al.  Radiovisiography for length estimation in root canal treatment: an in-vitro comparison with conventional radiography. , 1991, International endodontic journal.

[9]  C. Metz,et al.  A New Approach for Testing the Significance of Differences Between ROC Curves Measured from Correlated Data , 1984 .

[10]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[11]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[12]  D. Dorfman,et al.  Maximum-likelihood estimation of parameters of signal-detection theory and determination of confidence intervals—Rating-method data , 1969 .

[13]  U. Welander,et al.  Sens-A-Ray. A new system for direct digital intraoral radiography. , 1992, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[14]  P. F. van der Stelt.  The E-mago image processing environment for direct digital radiography in dentistry , 1993 .

[15]  K Horner,et al.  Radiovisiography: an initial evaluation , 1990, British Dental Journal.

[16]  John A. Swets,et al.  Evaluation of diagnostic systems : methods from signal detection theory , 1982 .

[17]  A D Linney,et al.  Comparison of three imaging techniques for assessing endodontic working length. , 1992, International endodontic journal.

[18]  C E Metz,et al.  Quantification of failure to demonstrate statistical significance. The usefulness of confidence intervals. , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[19]  C Benz,et al.  Evaluation of the new RadioVisioGraphy system image quality. , 1991, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.