Screening for EIA in India: enhancing effectiveness through ecological carrying capacity approach.

Developing countries across the world have embraced the policy of high economic growth as a means to reduce poverty. This economic growth largely based on industrial output is fast degrading the ecosystems, jeopardizing their long term sustainability. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) has long been recognized as a tool which can help in protecting the ecosystems and aid sustainable development. The Screening guidelines for EIA reflect the level of commitment the nation displays towards tightening its environmental protection system. The paper analyses the screening process for EIA in India and dissects the rationale behind the exclusions and thresholds set in the screening process. The screening process in India is compared with that of the European Union with the aim of understanding the extent of deviations from a screening approach in the context of better economic development. It is found that the Indian system excludes many activities from the purview of screening itself when compared to the EU. The constraints responsible for these exclusions are discussed and the shortcomings of the current command and control system of environmental management in India are also explained. It is suggested that an ecosystem carrying capacity based management system can provide significant inputs to enhance the effectiveness of EIA process from screening to monitoring.

[1]  David P. Lawrence,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment: Practical Solutions to Recurrent Problems , 2003 .

[2]  John Bailey,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment and Management: An Underexplored Relationship , 1997 .

[3]  Nandini Banerjee,et al.  Impact of informal regulation of pollution on water quality in rivers in India. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  Larry W. Canter,et al.  Impact significance determination--Basic considerations and a sequenced approach , 1993 .

[5]  R. Pachauri,et al.  The future of India’s economic growth: the natural resources and energy dimension , 2004 .

[6]  Jawaid Nezam Hashmi..  India at a glance , 1990 .

[7]  Judith Petts,et al.  Handbook of environmental impact assessment , 1999 .

[8]  John Glasson,et al.  Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[9]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Exploring the EIA/Environmental Management Relationship , 1999 .

[10]  Fikret Berkes,et al.  Politics of Co-Optation: Community Forest Management Versus Joint Forest Management in Orissa, India , 2008, Environmental management.

[12]  T. Rajaram,et al.  Water pollution by industrial effluents in India: Discharge scenarios and case for participatory ecosystem specific local regulation , 2008 .

[13]  Carys Jones.  Screening, scoping and consideration of alternatives , 1999 .

[14]  Ajay Chhibber,et al.  World development report 1997 : the state in a changing world , 1997 .

[15]  E. F. Schumacher.  Small Is Beautiful: Economics as if People Mattered , 1973 .

[16]  Rajshri Jayaraman,et al.  Small-Scale Industry, Environmental Regulation, and Poverty: The Case of Brazil , 2004 .

[17]  Snigdha Chakrabarti,et al.  Economic and environmental impacts of pollution control regulation on small industries: a case study , 2005 .

[18]  Ashutosh Das,et al.  A methodology for integrated assessment of rural linkages in a developing nation , 2008 .

[19]  Ritu Paliwal,et al.  EIA practice in India and its evaluation using SWOT analysis , 2006 .

[20]  D. H. Yaalon,et al.  Down to earth , 2019, Nature.

[21]  Constantina Skanavis,et al.  Public Participation Mechanisms in Environmental Disasters , 2005, Environmental management.

[22]  E. Weiss.  United Nations Conference on Environment and Development , 1992, International Legal Materials.

[23]  T. Rajaram,et al.  Sustainable frugality through EIA: role of socio‐ecological linkages in poverty alleviation , 2007 .