Price differentiation in the kelly mechanism

Resource allocation [7, 4] and pricing [13, 1, 12] for network resources, e.g., bandwidth, have been studied extensively during the last decade. Among various proposed pricing and allocation mechanisms, the Kelly mechanism [7] stands out as a simple and scalable solution. Kelly et al [7, 6] first showed that it can be used as a congestion pricing mechanism to achieve proportional fairness. However, Johari and Tsisiklis [4] found that the resource allocation from the Kelly mechanism might induce an efficiency loss up to 25% of the social optimality. In this paper, we generalize the Kelly mechanism by designing a build-in price differentiation and show that the efficiency gap can be closed. In particular, we analyze the resource competition game under the generalized mechanism and show that any price differentiation induces a unique Nash equilibrium. We further reveal the relationship between the price differentiation and its resulting resource allocations and derive the optimal condition under which the social welfare reaches maximum. Our generalization extends the flexibility of the Kelly mechanism in two very different ways. First, it allows autonomous resource owners to use price differentiations so as to achieve individual objectives. Second, it provides a method for altruistic resource owners to make tradeoffs between user fairness (in terms of price differentiation) and system efficiency (in terms of social welfare).

[1]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Pricing in Computer Networks: Reshaping the Research Agenda , 2020, The Internet and Telecommunications Policy.

[2]  Bruce Hajek,et al.  Do Greedy Autonomous Systems Make for a Sensible Internet , 2003 .

[3]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Rate control for communication networks: shadow prices, proportional fairness and stability , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[4]  Milan Vojnovic,et al.  Weighted proportional allocation , 2011, SIGMETRICS '11.

[5]  Michael Devetsikiotis,et al.  An overview of pricing concepts for broadband IP networks , 2000, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[6]  T. Başar,et al.  Nash Equilibrium and Decentralized Negotiation in Auctioning Divisible Resources , 2003 .

[7]  Ilya Segal,et al.  Solutions manual for Microeconomic theory : Mas-Colell, Whinston and Green , 1997 .

[8]  Tamer Basar,et al.  Efficient signal proportional allocation (ESPA) mechanisms: decentralized social welfare maximization for divisible resources , 2006, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[9]  Frank Kelly,et al.  Charging and rate control for elastic traffic , 1997, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[10]  Andrew M. Odlyzko,et al.  Paris metro pricing for the internet , 1999, EC '99.

[11]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  Microeconomic Theory , 1995 .

[12]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Efficiency loss in a network resource allocation game: the case of elastic supply , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[13]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Efficiency of Scalar-Parameterized Mechanisms , 2008, Oper. Res..

[14]  Ramesh Johari,et al.  Efficiency loss in market mechanisms for resource allocation , 2004 .