Inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex

We evaluated inter-individual variability in optimal current direction for biphasic transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex. Motor threshold for first dorsal interosseus was detected visually at eight coil orientations in 45 degrees increments. Each participant (n=13) completed two experimental sessions. One participant with low test-retest correlation (Pearson's r<0.5) was excluded. In four subjects, visual detection of motor threshold was compared to EMG detection; motor thresholds were very similar and highly correlated (0.94-0.99). Similar with previous studies, stimulation in the majority of participants was most effective when the first current pulse flowed towards postero-lateral in the brain. However, in four participants, the optimal coil orientation deviated from this pattern. A principal component analysis using all eight orientations suggests that in our sample the optimal orientation of current direction was normally distributed around the postero-lateral orientation with a range of 63 degrees (S.D.=13.70 degrees). Whenever the intensity of stimulation at the target site is calculated as a percentage from the motor threshold, in order to minimize intensity and side-effects it may be worthwhile to check whether rotating the coil 45 degrees from the traditional posterior-lateral orientation decreases motor threshold.

[1]  K. Sugawara,et al.  Differential modulations of intracortical neural circuits between two intrinsic hand muscles , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  P. Mazzone,et al.  The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  A T Barker,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Which part of the current waveform causes the stimulation? , 2001, Experimental brain research.

[4]  W. Paulus,et al.  Half sine, monophasic and biphasic transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[5]  Johannes Mathis,et al.  Significance of coil orientation for motor evoked potentials from nasalis muscle elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Heckmann,et al.  Significance of shape and size of the stimulating coil in magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  H. Topka,et al.  Motor thresholds in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study comparing different pulse waveforms, current directions and stimulator types , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[8]  G. Abbruzzese,et al.  Intracortical inhibition after paired transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on the current flow direction , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  J. B. Preston,et al.  Two representations of the hand in area 4 of a primate. II. Somatosensory input organization. , 1982, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Z. Nahas,et al.  Motor threshold in transcranial magnetic stimulation: a comparison of a neurophysiological method and a visualization of movement method. , 1998, The journal of ECT.

[11]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The cortical silent period: intrinsic variability and relation to the waveform of the transcranial magnetic stimulation pulse , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  P H Ellaway,et al.  Suppression of voluntary motor activity revealed using transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in man. , 1994, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  M. Hallett,et al.  Optimal Focal Transcranial Magnetic Activation of the Human Motor Cortex: Effects of Coil Orientation, Shape of the Induced Current Pulse, and Stimulus Intensity , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[14]  Zafiris J Daskalakis,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a new investigational and treatment tool in psychiatry. , 2002, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[15]  S. Boniface,et al.  Magnetic brain stimulation with a double coil: the importance of coil orientation. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.