IN ecological studies, it is often necessary to identify very many organisms. Loader's new work on yeast classification1, 2 recommends about sixty physiological tests for identification, as well as microscopical observations, thus providing a formidable task for anyone bent on identifying hundreds or thousands of yeasts. Hence, to identify a group of yeasts, one must usually select certain tests to use and not others. Here a successful application is described of the systematic method proposed earlier3 for selecting tests to identify strains found in a recent survey of yeasts on strawberries4; we also discuss the relative efficiencies of the tests in Lodder's work, the uncorrected proofs of which were kindly made available for study.
[1]
J. C. GOWER,et al.
Selecting Tests in Diagnostic Keys with Unknown Responses
,
1971,
Nature.
[2]
J. A. Barnett.
Biochemical Classification of Yeasts
,
1961,
Nature.
[3]
F. Beech,et al.
The Distribution of Yeasts on Cider Apples
,
1964
.
[4]
J. A. Barnett.
A Biochemical Interpretation of Some Taxonomic Differences Between Yeasts*
,
1966,
Nature.
[5]
J. A. Barnett.
Comparative Studies of Yeasts
,
1960,
Nature.
[6]
J. Fell,et al.
USE OF SHAKEN CULTURES IN THE ASSIMILATION TEST FOR YEAST IDENTIFICATION
,
1960,
Journal of bacteriology.
[7]
G. Ainsworth,et al.
The fungi : an advanced treatise
,
1965
.