Applying cognitive psychology principles to the (dis)information environment: an examination of discourse comprehension, memory, and fusion of news articles

Disinformation campaigns such as fake news have evolved beyond traditional propaganda and are being used in strategic ways. Further, sources of information have changed from traditional media (newspapers, fliers, radio) to multi social media platforms (Twitter, You-Tube, Reddit). This paper addresses how cognitive psychology research related to traditional texts and news discourse applies to information garnered in the changing social media environment and especially false information. Specifically, the memory representations that readers create when they read text and how they are able to integrate complex ideas from multiple sources (including images) are reviewed. An emphasis is placed on the fragility of memory representations such as the susceptibility to information reconstruction and how that vulnerability can interact with disinformation. Potential ways to counter disinformation are explored such as perspective shifting, changing the context, and thinking analytically. In addition, this paper will identifies what gaps need to be addressed in the growing research areas of misinformation and fake news.

[1]  David G. Rand,et al.  Implausibility and Illusory Truth: Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News but Has No Effect on Entirely Implausible Statements , 2017 .

[2]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  Master Narratives of Islamist Extremism , 2011 .

[3]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  The Role of Familiarity in Correcting Inaccurate Information , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  H L Roediger,et al.  Can Bartlett’s repeated reproduction experiments be replicated? , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[5]  Markus Prior,et al.  Liberated Viewers, Polarized Voters--The Implications of Increased Media Choice for Democratic Politics , 2003 .

[6]  Floyd H. Allport,et al.  Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: why some people believe them. , 1945 .

[7]  Verónica Pérez-Rosas,et al.  Automatic Detection of Fake News , 2017, COLING.

[8]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[9]  David G. Rand,et al.  Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. , 2020, Journal of personality.

[10]  S. Savage,et al.  Preventing Violent Extremism through Value Complexity: Being Muslim Being British , 2013 .

[11]  Jeffrey A. Gottfried,et al.  News use across social media platforms 2016 , 2016 .

[12]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Misinformation and Its Correction , 2012, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[13]  Lynn Hasher,et al.  Is memory schematic , 1983 .

[14]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  Huan Liu,et al.  Tracing Fake-News Footprints: Characterizing Social Media Messages by How They Propagate , 2018, WSDM.

[16]  R. Mayer 3 Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2014 .

[17]  Ian Skurnik,et al.  Metacognitive Experiences and the Intricacies of Setting People Straight: Implications for Debiasing and Public Information Campaigns , 2007 .

[18]  Danielle C. Polage,et al.  Making up History: False Memories of Fake News Stories , 2012 .

[19]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  On the reception and detection of pseudo-profound bullshit , 2015, Judgment and Decision Making.

[20]  Thomas C. Toppino,et al.  Frequency and the Conference of Referential Validity. , 1977 .

[21]  Rolf A. Zwaan Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. , 1994 .

[22]  David G. Rand,et al.  Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning , 2019, Cognition.

[23]  F. Schmalhofer,et al.  Three components of understanding a programmer's manual: Verbatim, propositional and situational representations , 1986 .

[24]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models and aging. , 2001, Psychology and aging.

[25]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction? , 2017, Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.

[26]  E. Loftus,et al.  Recovered memories of childhood abuse: A source monitoring perspective. , 1994 .

[27]  J. Bransford,et al.  The abstraction of linguistic ideas: A review , 1972 .

[28]  Hollyn M. Johnson,et al.  Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. , 1994 .

[29]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[30]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning , 2021, The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning.

[31]  A. Roets,et al.  ‘Fake news’: Incorrect, but hard to correct. The role of cognitive ability on the impact of false information on social impressions , 2017 .

[32]  John D. Bransford,et al.  The abstraction of linguistic ideas , 1971 .

[33]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[34]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Short-term sequential memory for pictures and words , 1971 .

[35]  Frank J. Lee,et al.  No Effect of Commercial Cognitive Training on Brain Activity, Choice Behavior, or Cognitive Performance , 2017, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  Sibel Adali,et al.  This Just In: Fake News Packs a Lot in Title, Uses Simpler, Repetitive Content in Text Body, More Similar to Satire than Real News , 2017, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media.

[37]  David G. Rand,et al.  Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[38]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation , 2010, Memory & cognition.

[39]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .