Decision-Making in Water Governance: From Conflicting Interests to Shared Values

The development of water infrastructure is a long and complex process that involves multiple stakeholders, multiple scales, various sub-systems and relations of dependence among stakeholders. Stakeholder participation is increasingly seen as an indispensable element of water policymaking. The failure to address stakeholders’ underlying values, however, may create or exacerbate conflicts. In this chapter, we address the difficulty of approaching stakeholder participation in terms of conflicting interests. We illustrate this with an urban flood prevention case, followed by a categorisation of the difficulties presented by such processes. Instead of pursuing an interest-oriented approach, we suggest taking a step back in order to discern the influence of differing conceptions of shared values on multi-stakeholder decision-making processes. The goal of this chapter is to achieve a better understanding of the difficulties entailed in interest-driven decision-making processes in water governance, and how it could be beneficial to pursue a value-sensitive approach in such situations.

[1]  Jürgen Habermas,et al.  Reconciliation through the public use of reason: Remarks on John Rawls's political liberalism , 1995 .

[2]  Henriëtte S. Otter,et al.  Knowledge and Perceptions in Participatory Policy Processes: Lessons from the Delta-Region in the Netherlands , 2008 .

[3]  Steven R. Brechin,et al.  Contested nature conservation and development at the turn of the twenty-first century , 2003 .

[4]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change , 2006 .

[5]  John D. Rawls,et al.  Reply to Habermas , 1995 .

[6]  S. Schwartz.  Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values , 1994 .

[7]  Kenneth R. Fleischmann,et al.  Developing a meta-inventory of human values , 2010, ASIST.

[8]  Pieter W. G. Bots,et al.  MAIA: a Framework for Developing Agent-Based Social Simulations , 2013, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[9]  M. Reed.  Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[10]  Neelke Doorn.  Governance Experiments in Water Management: From Interests to Building Blocks , 2016, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[11]  N. C. Van de Giesen,et al.  Learning from Collaborative Research in Water Management Practice , 2012, Water Resources Management.

[12]  Lambèr M. M. Royakkers,et al.  Ethics, Technology, and Engineering: An Introduction , 2011 .

[13]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[14]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on New Methods for Adaptive Water Management Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-)Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda , 2009 .

[15]  P. Weingart,et al.  Democratization of Expertise?: Exploring Novel Forms of Scientific Advice in Political Decision-Making , 2005 .

[16]  Ibo van de Poel,et al.  Translating Values into Design Requirements , 2013 .

[17]  Phan Minh Dung,et al.  On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games , 1995, Artif. Intell..

[18]  J. Dryzek.  The Politics of the Earth , 2021 .

[19]  Gholamreza Jafari,et al.  Transparency Effect in the Emergence of Monopolies in Social Networks , 2013, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[20]  J. Austin.  How to do things with words , 1962 .

[21]  Javier Vázquez-Salceda,et al.  OMNI: Introducing Social Structure, Norms and Ontologies into Agent Organizations , 2004, PROMAS.

[22]  Leland L. Glenna,et al.  Value-Laden Technocratic Management and Environmental Conflicts , 2010 .

[23]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Participative and Stakeholder-Based Policy Design, Evaluation and Modeling Processes , 2002 .

[24]  H. Miller.  Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy, and Decision Making , 2005 .

[25]  Michael Jacobs,et al.  Sustainable development as a contested concept , 1999 .

[26]  John D. Rawls,et al.  Political Liberalism: Reply to Habermas , 1995 .

[27]  Simon Joss,et al.  Considering the concept of procedural justice for public policy- and decision-making in science and technology , 1999 .

[28]  M. Rokeach.  The Nature Of Human Values , 1974 .

[29]  Huib Aldewereld,et al.  The Role of Values , 2016, COIN@AAMAS/ECAI.

[30]  R. Perhac,et al.  Comparative Risk Assessment: Where Does the Public Fit In? , 1998 .

[31]  M. J. Kolkman,et al.  Mental model mapping as a new tool to analyse the use of information in decision-making in integrated water management , 2005 .