Radiologic progression of glioblastoma under therapy—an exploratory analysis of AVAglio

Background In this exploratory analysis of AVAglio, a randomized phase III clinical study that investigated the addition of bevacizumab (Bev) to radiotherapy/temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma, we aim to radiologically characterize glioblastoma on therapy until progression and investigate whether the type of radiologic progression differs between treatment arms and is related to survival and molecular data. Methods Five progression types (PTs) were categorized using an adapted algorithm according to MRI contrast enhancement behavior in T1- and T2-weighted images in 621 patients (Bev, n = 299; placebo, n = 322). Frequencies of PTs (designated as classic T1, cT1 relapse, T2 diffuse, T2 circumscribed, and primary nonresponder), time to progression (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed within each treatment arm and compared with molecular subtypes and O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status. Results PT frequencies differed between the Bev and placebo arms, except for "T2 diffuse" (12.4% and 7.1%, respectively). PTs showed differences in PFS and OS; with "T2 diffuse" being associated with longest survival. Complete disappearance of contrast enhancement during treatment ("cT1 relapse") showed longer survival than only partial contrast enhancement decrease ("classic T1"). "T2 diffuse" was more commonly MGMT hypermethylated. Only weak correlations to molecular subtypes from primary tissue were detected. Conclusions Progression of glioblastoma under therapy can be characterized radiologically. These radiologic phenotypes are influenced by treatment and develop differently over time with differential outcomes. Complete resolution of contrast enhancement during treatment is a favorable factor for outcome.

[1]  Paul S Mischel,et al.  Relationship between gene expression and enhancement in glioblastoma multiforme: exploratory DNA microarray analysis. , 2008, Radiology.

[2]  S. Pastorino,et al.  Transdifferentiation of glioblastoma cells into vascular endothelial cells , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  W. Mason,et al.  Evaluation of pseudoprogression rates and tumor progression patterns in a phase III trial of bevacizumab plus radiotherapy/temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2016, Neuro-oncology.

[4]  R. Henriksson,et al.  Spatial Expression of VEGF-A in Human Glioma , 2002, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[5]  P. Carmeliet,et al.  Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis , 2011, Nature.

[6]  G. Reifenberger,et al.  MGMT Promoter Methylation Is a Strong Prognostic Biomarker for Benefit from Dose-Intensified Temozolomide Rechallenge in Progressive Glioblastoma: The DIRECTOR Trial , 2015, Clinical Cancer Research.

[7]  Alexander Radbruch,et al.  Progression types after antiangiogenic therapy are related to outcome in recurrent glioblastoma , 2014, Neurology.

[8]  Thomas D. Wu,et al.  Molecular subclasses of high-grade glioma predict prognosis, delineate a pattern of disease progression, and resemble stages in neurogenesis. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[9]  Hassan M. Fathallah-Shaykh,et al.  Effects of Anti-Angiogenesis on Glioblastoma Growth and Migration: Model to Clinical Predictions , 2014, PloS one.

[10]  K. Aldape,et al.  A randomized trial of bevacizumab for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  In-Hee Lee,et al.  Clonal evolution of glioblastoma under therapy , 2016, Nature Genetics.

[12]  Byung Sup Kim,et al.  Prognostic implication of progression pattern after anti-VEGF bevacizumab treatment for recurrent malignant gliomas , 2015, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[13]  Gabriele Bergers,et al.  Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[14]  G. Fuller,et al.  Tumor invasion after treatment of glioblastoma with bevacizumab: radiographic and pathologic correlation in humans and mice , 2010, Neuro-oncology.

[15]  Benjamin M. Ellingson,et al.  Radiogenomics and Imaging Phenotypes in Glioblastoma: Novel Observations and Correlation with Molecular Characteristics , 2014, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports.

[16]  K. Hoang-Xuan,et al.  Bevacizumab plus radiotherapy-temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Heiland,et al.  Bevacizumab does not increase the risk of remote relapse in malignant glioma , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[18]  R. Bourgon,et al.  Patients With Proneural Glioblastoma May Derive Overall Survival Benefit From the Addition of Bevacizumab to First-Line Radiotherapy and Temozolomide: Retrospective Analysis of the AVAglio Trial. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  K. Aldape,et al.  Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  A. Verma MGMT Gene Silencing and Benefit From Temozolomide in Glioblastoma , 2006 .

[21]  T. Tokuyasu,et al.  Microarray Analysis Verifies Two Distinct Phenotypes of Glioblastomas Resistant to Antiangiogenic Therapy , 2012, Clinical Cancer Research.