Toward opportunistic services for the industrial Internet of Things

Services are expected to represent the real drivers for all Internet of Things (IoT) application scenarios, including Industrial IoT (IIoT). Indeed, rather than focusing only on products, enterprises are now investing on product-service hybrids to improve operational efficiency, boost productivity and, most importantly, build new markets, hence diversifying their revenues. In this direction, IoT service modeling is a crucial activity requiring a multi-facet in-depth examination. In this paper, we first discuss the importance of IoT services by eliciting related benefits and challenges. Then, we tackle service modeling from both a developer-oriented (comprising highlevel descriptive metamodels and ontologies) and an enterprise-oriented (comprising operational models subject to formal verification and execution, such as extensions of the conventional Business Process Models, Petri Nets and WorkFlows) perspective, providing a conceptual mapping between these two complementary approaches. The proposed new paradigm of “Opportunistic IoT Service” extends the available models by explicitly considering essential features for service provision, i.e., dynamicity, context-awareness, co-location and transience.

[1]  Wu He,et al.  Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[2]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  Agent-oriented modeling and simulation of IoT networks , 2016, 2016 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS).

[3]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Guest Editorial Special Section on Advances and Applications of Internet of Things for Smart Automated Systems , 2016, IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng..

[4]  Gheorghe H. Popescu,et al.  THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF THE INDUSTRIAL INTERNET OF THINGS , 2015 .

[5]  Imrich Chlamtac,et al.  Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges , 2012, Ad Hoc Networks.

[6]  Shingo Yamaguchi,et al.  On service personalization analysis for the internet of me based on PN2 , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE).

[7]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  Towards Cyberphysical Digital Libraries: Integrating IoT Smart Objects into Digital Libraries , 2016, Management of Cyber Physical Objects in the Future Internet of Things.

[8]  Sonja Meyer,et al.  On IoT-services: Survey, Classification and Enterprise Integration , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications.

[9]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  Integration of agent-based and Cloud Computing for the smart objects-oriented IoT , 2014, Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 18th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD).

[10]  Carsten Magerkurth,et al.  Towards modeling real-world aware business processes , 2011, WoT '11.

[11]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  Towards a Development Methodology for Smart Object-Oriented IoT Systems: A Metamodel Approach , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[12]  Giancarlo Fortino,et al.  Autonomic and Cognitive Architectures for the Internet of Things , 2015, IDCS.

[13]  Jian Huang,et al.  Extending service model to build an effective service composition framework for cyber-physical systems , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing and Applications (SOCA).

[14]  Lin Yang,et al.  Reliable Data Transmission Method for Hybrid Industrial Network Based on Mobile Object , 2016, IDCS.

[15]  Lida Xu,et al.  A New Approach for Compliance Checking in Service Workflows , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[16]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Data-Driven Service Composition in Enterprise SOA Solutions: A Petri Net Approach , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[17]  Min Chen,et al.  A Survey on Internet of Things From Industrial Market Perspective , 2015, IEEE Access.

[18]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Petri nets and industrial applications: A tutorial , 1994, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..