The rise of multiple institutional affiliations in academia

This study provides the first systematic, international, large‐scale evidence on the extent and nature of multiple institutional affiliations on journal publications. Studying more than 15 million authors and 22 million articles from 40 countries we document that: In 2019, almost one in three articles was (co‐)authored by authors with multiple affiliations and the share of authors with multiple affiliations increased from around 10% to 16% since 1996. The growth of multiple affiliations is prevalent in all fields and it is stronger in high impact journals. About 60% of multiple affiliations are between institutions from within the academic sector. International co‐affiliations, which account for about a quarter of multiple affiliations, most often involve institutions from the United States, China, Germany and the United Kingdom, suggesting a core‐periphery network. Network analysis also reveals a number communities of countries that are more likely to share affiliations. We discuss potential causes and show that the timing of the rise in multiple affiliations can be linked to the introduction of more competitive funding structures such as “excellence initiatives” in a number of countries. We discuss implications for science and science policy.

[1]  Rosario Romera,et al.  Funding, is it key for standing out in the university rankings? , 2019, Scientometrics.

[2]  Tommaso Agasisti,et al.  The Russian Excellence Initiative for higher education: a nonparametric evaluation of short-term results , 2020, Int. Trans. Oper. Res..

[3]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  Higher education policy: Why hope for quality when rewarding quantity? , 2020 .

[4]  Liang Zhang,et al.  Engineering a World Class University? The Impact of Taiwan’s World Class University Project on Scientific Productivity , 2018, Higher Education Policy.

[5]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  In search of excellence: a case study of the first excellence initiative of Germany , 2016, Journal of Business Economics.

[6]  Daniel B. Larremore,et al.  Productivity, prominence, and the effects of academic environment , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Tamara Turko,et al.  Influence of the program “5–top 100” on the publication activity of Russian universities , 2016, Scientometrics.

[8]  Stefano Horst Baruffaldi,et al.  Return mobility and scientific productivity of researchers working abroad: The role of home country linkages , 2012 .

[9]  John R. Kitchin,et al.  pybliometrics: Scriptable bibliometrics using a Python interface to Scopus , 2019, SoftwareX.

[10]  Adèle Paul-Hus,et al.  The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis , 2015, Scientometrics.

[11]  Lutz Bornmann Is the promotion of research reflected in bibliometric data? A network analysis of highly cited papers on the Clusters of Excellence supported under the Excellence Initiative in Germany , 2016, Scientometrics.

[12]  Vincent A. Traag,et al.  From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[13]  Hanna Hottenrott,et al.  A first look at multiple institutional affiliations: a study of authors in Germany, Japan and the UK , 2017, Scientometrics.

[14]  M. Kenney,et al.  Building global-class universities: Assessing the impact of the 985 Project , 2013 .

[15]  Erin A. Cech,et al.  How Economics Shapes Science , 2013 .

[16]  Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote,et al.  A new approach to the metric of journals' scientific prestige: The SJR indicator , 2010, J. Informetrics.

[17]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[18]  Wes McKinney,et al.  Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python , 2010, SciPy.

[19]  Q. Schiermeier Academic excellence: Golden Germany , 2017, Nature.

[20]  C. Paradeise How Effective Have Reform Policies Been in Redesigning the French Higher Education and Research System , 2018 .

[21]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  Research assessment in the UK and Italy: : Costly and difficult, but probably worth it (at least for a while) , 2016 .

[22]  Claudia Noumedem Temgoua,et al.  Inventor migration and knowledge flows: A two-way communication channel? , 2020, Research Policy.

[23]  Jean-Baptiste Meyer,et al.  Diaspora knowledge networks : vanishing doubt and increasing evidence , 2006 .

[24]  Paula E. Stephan How Economics Shapes Science , 2012 .

[25]  Sarah de Rijcke,et al.  To intervene or not to intervene; is that the question? On the role of scientometrics in research evaluation , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Paula E. Stephan,et al.  Scientific Teams and Institution Collaborations: Evidence from U.S. Universities, 1981-1999 , 2004 .

[27]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Which of the world's institutions employ the most highly cited researchers? An analysis of the data from highlycited.com , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[28]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S3 References the Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge , 2022 .

[29]  Yudhijit Bhattacharjee,et al.  Citation impact. Saudi universities offer cash in exchange for academic prestige. , 2011, Science.

[30]  M. Wende International academic mobility: towards a concentration of the minds in Europe , 2015 .

[31]  J. Pugh,et al.  Research Assessment , 1998 .

[32]  A. Mas-Colell,et al.  The Governance and Performance of Universities: Evidence from Europe and the US , 2010 .

[33]  A. Ferligoj,et al.  Scientific collaboration in Russian universities before and after the excellence initiative Project 5-100 , 2020, Scientometrics.

[34]  John T. Li What we learn from the shifts in highly cited data from 2001 to 2014? , 2016, Scientometrics.

[35]  C. Paradeise,et al.  Universities and the Production of Elites , 2018 .

[36]  Julian Hamann The Production of Research Elites: Research Performance Assessment in the United Kingdom , 2018 .

[37]  Grégoire Côté,et al.  Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies , 2020, Quantitative Science Studies.

[38]  Allocation of funds and research output : The case of UK Universities , 1997 .

[39]  Giulio Rossetti,et al.  CDLIB: a python library to extract, compare and evaluate communities from complex networks , 2019, Applied Network Science.

[40]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Establishing world-class universities in China: deploying a quasi-experimental design to evaluate the net effects of Project 985 , 2019 .

[41]  Aric Hagberg,et al.  Exploring Network Structure, Dynamics, and Function using NetworkX , 2008, Proceedings of the Python in Science Conference.

[42]  A. Geuna,et al.  Research Assessment in the UK and Italy: Costly and Difficult, But Probably Worth (at Least for a While) , 2015 .

[43]  Marijk C. van der Wende International Academic Mobility: Towards a Concentration of the Minds in Europe , 2015, European Review.

[44]  Benjamin F. Jones,et al.  Multi-University Research Teams: Shifting Impact, Geography, and Stratification in Science , 2008, Science.

[45]  J. Salmi Excellence Strategies and the Creation of World-Class Universities , 2016 .

[46]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Science policy for a highly collaborative science system , 1996 .

[47]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Studying scientific migration in Scopus , 2013, Scientometrics.

[48]  Isak Froumin,et al.  Excellence-Driven Policies and Initiatives in the Context of Bologna Process: Rationale, Design, Implementation and Outcomes , 2015 .