How reproducible is self-reported information on exposure to smoking, drinking, and dietary patterns? Evidence among Brazilian adults in the Pró-Saúde Study.

CONTEXT Epidemiological studies of the validity and reliability of self-reported information on important risk factors for non-communicable chronic diseases are scarce in Brazil. OBJECTIVE We evaluated the test-retest reliability of information--overall and stratified by gender, age and education--on active and passive smoking, alcohol intake and aspects of dietary habits. TYPE OF STUDY Test-retest reliability. SETTING Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS 192 University employees. PROCEDURES Self-administered questionnaires were completed on two occasions, two weeks apart. MAIN MEASUREMENTS Kappa Statistics; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient. RESULTS Information on smoking status and pack-years smoked had almost perfect levels of agreement, respectively, kappa = 0.97 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00), and intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93 (CI 95%, 0.89-0.96). Characteristics of alcohol intake yielded substantial levels of agreement (kappa ranging from 0.62 to 0.69). The reproducibility of the information on dietary habits varied from 0.67 to 0.79 (kappa). No clear-cut patterns could be identified comparing information by age or gender. There was a slight tendency towards greater reliability among people with higher levels of education. CONCLUSION The reproducibility of information on smoking, drinking, and dietary patterns ranged from substantial to excellent, as investigated in the Pró-Saúde Study, a longitudinal investigation recently launched in Rio de Janeiro.

[1]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[2]  L. Aday,et al.  Designing and conducting health surveys : a comprehensive guide , 2006 .

[3]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[4]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[5]  S. Homan,et al.  Reliability of information on physical activity and other chronic disease risk factors among US women aged 40 years or older. , 1999, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  W. Willett,et al.  The influence of age, relative weight, smoking, and alcohol intake on the reproducibility of a dietary questionnaire. , 1987, International journal of epidemiology.

[7]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[8]  M. Rubio‐Stipec,et al.  The Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST): development, reliability and feasibility. , 2002, Addiction.

[9]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[10]  N. Muñoz,et al.  Independent and joint effects of tobacco smoking and alcohol drinking on the risk of esophageal cancer in men and women , 1999, International journal of cancer.

[11]  S. Shea,et al.  Reproducibility of the women's module of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire. , 1996, Annals of epidemiology.

[12]  R. Brownson,et al.  Reliability of information on chronic disease risk factors collected in the Missouri Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. , 1994, Epidemiology.

[13]  J J Bartko,et al.  ON THE METHODS AND THEORY OF RELIABILITY , 1976, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[14]  M. Szklo,et al.  Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics , 1999 .

[15]  S. Shea,et al.  Reproducibility of responses to telephone interviews: demographic predictors of discordance in risk factor status. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[16]  S. Bowlin,et al.  Reliability and changes in validity of self-reported cardiovascular disease risk factors using dual response: the behavioral risk factor survey. , 1996, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.