Image‐guided helical tomotherapy for localized prostate cancer: technique and initial clinical observations

The purpose of the present study was to implement a technique for daily computed tomography (CT)–based image‐guided radiation therapy and to report observations on treatment planning, imaging, and delivery based on the first 2 years of clinical experience. Patients with previously untreated stage T1 – T3 biopsy‐proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate were considered eligible for treatment with daily CT‐guided helical tomotherapy. The prostate was targeted daily using megavoltage CT (MVCT) images that were fused with treatment‐planning CT images based on anatomic alignments. All patients were treated at 2 Gy per fraction to 76 – 78 Gy (mean: 76.7 Gy). As part of this study, 33 prostate patients were planned, imaged, and treated with a total of 1266 CT‐guided fractions. The prostate, rectum, bladder, femoral heads, and pubis symphysis were visible in one or more slices for all 1266 MVCT image sets. The typical range of measured prostate displacement relative to a 3‐point external laser setup in this study was 2 – 10 mm [3.4 mm standard deviation (SD)] in the anterior–posterior direction, 2 – 8 mm (3.7 mm SD) in the lateral direction, and 1 – 6 mm (2.4 mm SD) in the superior–inferior direction. The obese patients in this study had a substantially larger lateral variation (8.2 mm SD) attributable to mobility of skin marks. The prostate, seminal vesicles, rectum, and bladder anatomy were used to position the patient relative to the desired treatment position without the use of implanted markers. Acute toxicities were within the expected range given the number of patients treated and the dose level. PACS numbers: 87.50.Gi, 87.53.Mr, 87.53.Tf

[1]  D Yan,et al.  An off-line strategy for constructing a patient-specific planning target volume in adaptive treatment process for prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Charles R. Thomas,et al.  Progression free survival (PFS) after whole-pelvic (WP) vs. mini-pelvic (MP) or prostate only (PO) radiotherapy (RT): A subset analysis of RTOG 9413, a Phase III prospective randomized trial using neoadjuvant and concurrent (N&CHT) , 2004 .

[3]  C. Reddy,et al.  Short-course intensity-modulated radiotherapy (70 GY at 2.5 GY per fraction) for localized prostate cancer: preliminary results on late toxicity and quality of life. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Jan-Jakob Sonke,et al.  Automatic prostate localization on cone-beam CT scans for high precision image-guided radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Jan J W Lagendijk,et al.  Measurements and clinical consequences of prostate motion during a radiotherapy fraction. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  David A Jaffray,et al.  Automatic localization of the prostate for on-line or off-line image-guided radiotherapy. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  J. Crook,et al.  Prostate motion during standard radiotherapy as assessed by fiducial markers. , 1995, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[8]  Richard K Valicenti,et al.  Toxicity after three-dimensional radiotherapy for prostate cancer with RTOG 9406 dose level IV. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  C. Ramsey,et al.  Evaluation of image-guided helical tomotherapy for the retreatment of spinal metastasis. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  T R Mackie,et al.  Characterization of the output for helical delivery of intensity modulated slit beams. , 1999, Medical physics.

[11]  David A Jaffray,et al.  On-line aSi portal imaging of implanted fiducial markers for the reduction of interfraction error during conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Charles R. Thomas,et al.  Whole-pelvis, "mini-pelvis," or prostate-only external beam radiotherapy after neoadjuvant and concurrent hormonal therapy in patients treated in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413 trial. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Evaluating the effect of rectal distension and rectal movement on prostate gland position using cine MRI. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  Jeff M Michalski,et al.  Toxicity after three-dimensional radiotherapy for prostate cancer on RTOG 9406 dose Level V. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  K. Lam,et al.  Retrospective analysis of prostate cancer patients with implanted gold markers using off-line and adaptive therapy protocols. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Intraprostatic fiducials for localization of the prostate gland: monitoring intermarker distances during radiation therapy to test for marker stability. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  David Jaffray,et al.  Online image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: How much improvement can we expect? A theoretical assessment of clinical benefits and potential dose escalation by improving precision and accuracy of radiation delivery. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Frieda Trichter,et al.  Prostate localization using transabdominal ultrasound imaging. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  A. Markoe,et al.  Interim report of toxicity from 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406, level III (79.2 Gy). , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  J. Kapatoes,et al.  Limited-data image registration for radiotherapy positioning and verification. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  J. Kapatoes,et al.  Megavoltage CT image reconstruction during tomotherapy treatments. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Late rectal bleeding after conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. II. Volume effects and dose-volume histograms. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  Lei Dong,et al.  Use of portal images and BAT ultrasonography to measure setup error and organ motion for prostate IMRT: implications for treatment margins. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  John Wong,et al.  Assessment of residual error for online cone-beam CT-guided treatment of prostate cancer patients. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  John Wong,et al.  Accuracy of a wireless localization system for radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  He Wang,et al.  An automatic CT-guided adaptive radiation therapy technique by online modification of multileaf collimator leaf positions for prostate cancer. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[28]  T R Mackie,et al.  Delivery verification in sequential and helical tomotherapy. , 1999, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Serial megavoltage CT imaging during external beam radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: observations on tumor regression during treatment. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[30]  J Wong,et al.  The use of adaptive radiation therapy to reduce setup error: a prospective clinical study. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[31]  Lei Dong,et al.  Intrafraction prostate motion during IMRT for prostate cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[32]  Lei Dong,et al.  Evaluation of a contour-alignment technique for CT-guided prostate radiotherapy: an intra- and interobserver study. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[33]  J O Deasy,et al.  Tomotherapy: a new concept for the delivery of dynamic conformal radiotherapy. , 1993, Medical physics.

[34]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[35]  P Kijewski,et al.  Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: implications for treatment planning. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  Di Yan,et al.  Phase II dose escalation study of image-guided adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: use of dose-volume constraints to achieve rectal isotoxicity. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[37]  J O Deasy,et al.  An investigation of tomotherapy beam delivery. , 1997, Medical physics.

[38]  D. Yan,et al.  Treatment of prostate cancer with radiotherapy: should the entire seminal vesicles be included in the clinical target volume? , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[39]  A. Markoe,et al.  Preliminary report of toxicity following 3D radiation therapy for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[40]  J. Cox,et al.  Prostate cancer: comparison of retrograde urethrography and computed tomography in radiotherapy planning. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[41]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Late GI and GU complications in the treatment of prostate cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[42]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Initial experience with megavoltage (MV) CT guidance for daily prostate alignments. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  M Wannenmacher,et al.  Combined error of patient positioning variability and prostate motion uncertainty in 3D conformal radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[44]  Patrick A Kupelian,et al.  Daily variations in delivered doses in patients treated with radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[45]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[46]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI). , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.