Histidine–Tryptophan–Ketoglutarate (HTK) Is Associated with Reduced Graft Survival in Deceased Donor Livers, Especially Those Donated After Cardiac Death

Single‐center studies have reported that liver allograft survival is not affected by preservation in histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate (HTK) versus University of Wisconsin (UW) solution. We analyzed the UNOS database of liver transplants performed from July, 2004, through February, 2008, to determine if preservation with HTK (n = 4755) versus UW (n = 12 673) impacted graft survival. HTK preservation of allografts increased from 16.8% in 2004 to 26.9% in 2008; this was particularly striking among donor after cardiac death (DCD) allografts, rising from 20.7% in 2004 to 40.9% in 2008. After adjusting for donor, recipient and graft factors that affect graft survival, HTK preservation was associated with an increased risk of graft loss (HR 1.14, p = 0.002), especially with DCD allografts (HR 1.44, P = 0.025) and those with cold ischemia time over 8 h (HR 1.16, P = 0.009). Furthermore, HTK preservation was associated with a 1.2‐fold higher odds of early (< 30 days) graft loss as compared to UW preservation (OR 1.20, p = 0.012), with a more pronounced effect on allografts with cold ischemia time over 8 h (OR 1.31, p = 0.007), DCD allografts (OR 1.63, p = 0.09) and donors over 70 years (OR 1.67, p = 0.081). These results suggest that the increasing use of HTK for abdominal organ preservation should be reexamined.

[1]  R. Mangus,et al.  Comparison of Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate Solution and University of Wisconsin Solution in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation , 2008, Transplantation.

[2]  D. Segev,et al.  Factors Affecting Graft Survival After Adult/Child Split‐Liver Transplantation: Analysis of the UNOS/OPTN Data Base , 2008, American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

[3]  M. Bartels,et al.  Comparison of histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution in adult liver transplantation. , 2008, Transplantation proceedings.

[4]  R. Mangus,et al.  Comparison of histidine‐tryptophan‐ketoglutarate solution and University of Wisconsin solution in extended criteria liver donors , 2008, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[5]  T. Welling,et al.  Biliary complications following liver transplantation in the model for end‐stage liver disease era: Effect of donor, recipient, and technical factors , 2008, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[6]  Liang Du,et al.  Histidine‐tryptophan‐ketoglutarate solution vs. University of Wisconsin solution for liver transplantation: A systematic review , 2007, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[7]  P. Neuhaus,et al.  Low viscosity histidine‐tryptophan‐ketoglutarate graft flush improves subsequent extended cold storage in University of Wisconsin solution in an extracorporeal rat liver perfusion and rat liver transplantation model , 2006, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[8]  D. Segev,et al.  Factors Affecting Graft Survival After Liver Transplantation from Donation After Cardiac Death Donors , 2006, Transplantation.

[9]  C. Marroni,et al.  Randomized clinical assay for hepatic grafts preservation with University of Wisconsin or histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solutions in liver transplantation. , 2006, Transplantation proceedings.

[10]  M. Castagneto,et al.  Comparative evaluation of two perfusion solutions for liver preservation and transplantation. , 2006, Transplantation proceedings.

[11]  G. Otto,et al.  Ischemic Type Biliary Lesions in Histidine-Tryptophan-Ketoglutarate (HTK) Preserved Liver Grafts , 2006, The International journal of artificial organs.

[12]  R. Mangus,et al.  Comparison of histidine‐tryptophan‐ketoglutarate solution (HTK) and University of Wisconsin solution (UW) in adult liver transplantation , 2006, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[13]  C. Broelsch,et al.  UW is superior to Celsior and HTK in the protection of human liver endothelial cells against preservation injury , 2004, Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society.

[14]  F. Langer,et al.  Histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate solution for organ preservation in human liver transplantation—a prospective multi-centre observation study , 2004, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[15]  B. Ringe,et al.  Experience with hystidine tryptophan ketoglutarate versus University Wisconsin preservation solutions in transplantation. , 2003, International surgery.

[16]  C. Broelsch,et al.  Celsior solution compared with University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate solution (HTK) in the protection of human hepatocytes against ischemia–reperfusion injury , 2003, Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.

[17]  T. V. van Gulik,et al.  Evaluation of rat liver apoptotic and necrotic cell death after cold storage using UW, HTK, and celsior , 2002, Transplantation.

[18]  H. Shinohara,et al.  Hepatic preservation with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution in living-related and cadaveric liver transplantation. , 1997, Clinical science.

[19]  J H Southard,et al.  Principles of solid-organ preservation by cold storage. , 1988, Transplantation.