A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model

Objectives To compare the therapeutic potential of tissue-engineered constructs (TECs) combining mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and coral granules from either Acropora or Porites to repair large bone defects. Materials and Methods Bone marrow-derived, autologous MSCs were seeded on Acropora or Porites coral granules in a perfusion bioreactor. Acropora-TECs (n = 7), Porites-TECs (n = 6) and bone autografts (n = 2) were then implanted into 25 mm long metatarsal diaphyseal defects in sheep. Bimonthly radiographic follow-up was completed until killing four months post-operatively. Explants were subsequently processed for microCT and histology to assess bone formation and coral bioresorption. Statistical analyses comprised Mann-Whitney, t-test and Kruskal–Wallis tests. Data were expressed as mean and standard deviation. Results A two-fold increaseof newly formed bone volume was observed for Acropora-TECs when compared with Porites-TECs (14 sd 1089 mm3 versus 782 sd 507 mm3; p = 0.09). Bone union was consistent with autograft (1960 sd 518 mm3). The kinetics of bioresorption and bioresorption rates at four months were different for Acropora-TECs and Porites-TECs (81% sd 5% versus 94% sd 6%; p = 0.04). In comparing the defects that healed with those that did not, we observed that, when major bioresorption of coral at two months occurs and a scaffold material bioresorption rate superior to 90% at four months is achieved, bone nonunion consistently occurred using coral-based TECs. Discussion Bone regeneration in critical-size defects could be obtained with full bioresorption of the scaffold using coral-based TECs in a large animal model. The superior performance of Acropora-TECs brings us closer to a clinical application, probably because of more suitable bioresorption kinetics. However, nonunion still occurred in nearly half of the bone defects. Cite this article: A. Decambron, M. Manassero, M. Bensidhoum, B. Lecuelle, D. Logeart-Avramoglou, H. Petite, V. Viateau. A comparative study of tissue-engineered constructs from Acropora and Porites coral in a large animal bone defect model. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:208–215. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.64.BJR-2016-0236.R1.

[1]  B. Ziran,et al.  Use of solid and cancellous autologous bone graft for fractures and nonunions. , 2010, The Orthopedic clinics of North America.

[2]  V. Bousson,et al.  Long‐bone critical‐size defects treated with tissue‐engineered grafts: A study on sheep , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  L. Sensébé,et al.  Mesenchymal stromal cells: misconceptions and evolving concepts. , 2013, Cytotherapy.

[4]  A. Meunier,et al.  A technique for creating critical-size defects in the metatarsus of sheep for use in investigation of healing of long-bone defects. , 2004, American journal of veterinary research.

[5]  Janice S. Lee,et al.  Biocomposites of pHEMA with HA/β -TCP (60/40) for bone tissue engineering: Swelling, hydrolytic degradation, and in vitro behavior. , 2013, Polymer.

[6]  P. Christel,et al.  Comparison of coral resorption and bone apposition with two natural corals of different porosities. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[7]  M. Mastrogiacomo,et al.  Reconstruction of extensive long bone defects in sheep using resorbable bioceramics based on silicon stabilized tricalcium phosphate. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[8]  J O Hollinger,et al.  The critical size defect as an experimental model to test bone repair materials. , 1990, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[9]  A. Vernay,et al.  Effet de la temperature sur la structure cristalline d'un biocorail , 1993 .

[10]  H. Petite,et al.  Comparative study of the osteogenic ability of four different ceramic constructs in an ectopic large animal model , 2016, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[11]  W. Russell,et al.  Ethical and Scientific Considerations Regarding Animal Testing and Research , 2011, PloS one.

[12]  F Peyrin,et al.  Engineering of bone using bone marrow stromal cells and a silicon-stabilized tricalcium phosphate bioceramic: evidence for a coupling between bone formation and scaffold resorption. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[13]  A. Meunier,et al.  Tissue-engineered bone regeneration , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[14]  B. David,et al.  A perfusion bioreactor for engineering bone constructs: an in vitro and in vivo study. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods.

[15]  K. Hing,et al.  Efficacy of silicate-substituted calcium phosphate with enhanced strut porosity as a standalone bone graft substitute and autograft extender in an ovine distal femoral critical defect model , 2015, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[16]  D. Hutmacher,et al.  Delayed Minimally Invasive Injection of Allogenic Bone Marrow Stromal Cell Sheets Regenerates Large Bone Defects in an Ovine Preclinical Animal Model , 2015, Stem cells translational medicine.

[17]  L. Yahia,et al.  Natural coral exoskeleton as a bone graft substitute: a review. , 2002, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[18]  M. Murali,et al.  A Comparative Study on Morphochemical Properties and Osteogenic Cell Differentiation within Bone Graft and Coral Graft Culture Systems , 2013, International journal of medical sciences.

[19]  T. Arinzeh,et al.  Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Ceramics for Bone Regeneration and Tissue Engineering Applications , 2010, Materials.

[20]  H. Petite,et al.  Comparison of Survival and Osteogenic Ability of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Orthotopic and Ectopic Sites in Mice. , 2016, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[21]  I. Martin,et al.  Reconstruction of Extensive Long-Bone Defects in Sheep Using Porous Hydroxyapatite Sponges , 2014, Calcified Tissue International.

[22]  T. Buckland,et al.  Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes. , 2007, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[23]  V. Bousson,et al.  De novo reconstruction of functional bone by tissue engineering in the metatarsal sheep model. , 2005, Tissue engineering.

[24]  Karim Oudina,et al.  Bone regeneration in sheep using acropora coral, a natural resorbable scaffold, and autologous mesenchymal stem cells. , 2013, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[25]  T. Lee,et al.  A comparative study of the physical and mechanical properties of three natural corals based on the criteria for bone–tissue engineering scaffolds , 2009, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.