Noise levels of superconducting gravimeters at seismic frequencies

SUMMARY Until recently superconducting gravimeters (SGs) have been used principally in tidal studies (periods 6^24 hr) due to their high sensitivity and low drift rates. This paper considers the performance of these instruments as long-period seismometers, particularly in the normal mode band (periods 1^54 min). To judge their suitability in providing useful information to seismology, it is important to determine their noise characteristics compared to other established instruments such as spring gravimeters. We compare several continuously recording instruments: the SGs in Esashi (Japan), Wuhan (China), Strasbourg (France) and Cantley (Canada) and the spring gravimeter ET-19 and seismometer STS-1 at the Black Forest Observatory (BFO, Germany). We also include non-permanent instruments, the SG102 at BFO as well as the ET-18 in MetsAhovi (Finland). The ¢ve quietest days out of the available records are stacked to obtain the power spectral density of the noise in the frequency band 0.05^20 mHz (50 s to 6 hr). Our reference is the New Low Noise Model designed for seismometers. Only at the BFO site were there several instruments that could be compared; even so, in order to obtain the best individual data for each instrument the records selected were not simultaneous. The noise characteristics of the diierent instrument^site combinations are compared, leading to conclusions about site selection, instrument modi¢cations and the recent potential of SGs to contribute to seismic normal mode studies. We refer to our previous work on the seismic noise magnitude, a summary statistic derived from the power spectral density which has been used to rank the performance of instrument^site combinations.

[1]  Suyang Xu,et al.  Analysis of superconducting gravimeter data from Table Mountain, Colorado , 1998 .

[2]  O. Francis,et al.  Two years of continuous measurements of tidal and nontidal variations of gravity in Boulder, Colorado , 1998 .

[3]  O. Francis,et al.  On the calibration of superconducting gravimeters with the help of absolute gravity measurements , 1998 .

[4]  Jeannot Trampert,et al.  Comparative study of superconducting gravimeters and broadband seismometers STS-1/Z in seismic and subseismic frequency bands. , 1997 .

[5]  P. Lognonné,et al.  The effects of the atmospheric pressure changes on seismic signals or how to improve the quality of a station , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[6]  W. Zürn,et al.  On noise reduction in vertical seismic records below 2 mHz using local barometric pressure , 1995 .

[7]  F. Klopping,et al.  From Chandler wobble to free oscillations: comparison of cryogenic gravimeters and other instruments in a wide period range , 1995 .

[8]  J. Hinderer,et al.  Noise limitations in the core-mode band of superconducting gravimeter data , 1995 .

[9]  W. Zürn,et al.  Comparison of a cryogenic and a spring gravimeter between 0.2 and 96 cpd at BFO Schiltach , 1995 .

[10]  B. Richter,et al.  The Frankfurt calibration system for relative gravimeters , 1995 .

[11]  D. Banka,et al.  SG record at Cantley, Canada : the short period part of the spectrum , 1995 .

[12]  W. Zürn,et al.  Comparison of free oscillation spectra from different instruments , 1995 .

[13]  Y. Fukuda,et al.  Resonance Parameters of the Free Core Nutation Measured from Three Superconducting Gravimeters in Japan , 1994 .

[14]  J. Hinderer,et al.  Performance of Wielandt-Streckeisen STS-1 seismometers in the tidal domain—preliminary results , 1994 .

[15]  A two-year comparison between the French and Canadian superconducting gravimeter data , 1994 .

[16]  J. Peterson,et al.  Observations and modeling of seismic background noise , 1993 .

[17]  J. Hinderer,et al.  A slew rate detection criterion applied to SG data processing , 1993 .

[18]  Guy Masters,et al.  Observation of low‐order toroidal modes from the 1989 Macquarie Rise event , 1992 .

[19]  M. Rochester,et al.  Slichter modes and Love numbers , 1992 .

[20]  Kamal,et al.  A test of the superconducting gravimeter as a long-period seismometer , 1992 .

[21]  J. Merriam.  An ephemeris for gravity tide predictions at the nanogal level , 1992 .

[22]  T. Baker,et al.  In situ calibration of LaCoste-Romberg earth tide gravity meter ET19 at BFO Schiltach , 1991 .

[23]  G. Jentzsch,et al.  The high frequency signals in high rate tidal data : Noise spectra from different tidal observations , 1991 .

[24]  W. Zürn,et al.  High quality data from La Coste-Romberg gravimeters with electrostatic feedback : A challenge for superconducting gravimeters , 1991 .

[25]  Stewart w. Smith.  IRIS—A university consortium for seismology , 1987 .

[26]  W. E. Farrell,et al.  Project IDA: A decade in review , 1986 .

[27]  Barbara Romanowicz,et al.  GEOSCOPE: A French initiative in long‐period three‐component global seismic networks , 1984 .

[28]  C. R. Hutt,et al.  Test and Calibration of the Digital World-Wide Standardized Seismograph , 1982 .

[29]  Earth-tide measurements with the superconducting gravimeter , 1972 .