What does current generative theory have to say about the explicit-implicit debate?

Taking a generative perspective, we divide aspects of language into three broad categories: those that cannot be learned (are inherent in Universal Grammar), those that are derived from Universal Grammar, and those that must be learned from the input. Using this framework of language to clarify the “what” of learning, we take the acquisition of null (and overt) subjects in languages like Spanish as an example of how to apply the framework. We demonstrate what properties of a null-subject grammar cannot be learned explicitly, which properties can, but also argue that it is an open empirical question as to whether these latter properties are learned using explicit processes, showing how linguistic and psychological approaches may intersect to better understand acquisition.

[1]  William O'Grady,et al.  Does Emergentism Have a Chance , 2008 .

[2]  N. Ellis Emergentism, Connectionism, and Language Learning. , 1998 .

[3]  H. Harley,et al.  DISTRIBUTED MORPHOLOGY , 1999 .

[4]  S. Pinker The language instinct : how the mind creates language , 1995 .

[5]  R. Leow,et al.  Getting a grip on the slippery construct of awareness: Toward a finer-grained methodological perspective , 2011 .

[6]  N. Spada,et al.  Interactions between Type of Instruction and Type of Language Feature: A Meta-Analysis. , 2010 .

[7]  Kevin R. Gregg SLA Theory: Construction and Assessment , 2008 .

[8]  Jason Rothman,et al.  Pragmatic deficits with syntactic consequences?: L2 pronominal subjects and the syntax–pragmatics interface , 2009 .

[9]  Melinda Whong,et al.  Universal grammar and the second language classroom , 2013 .

[10]  J. Rothman,et al.  THE SYNTAX OF NULL SUBJECTS IN L2 SPANISH: COMPARING TWO L2 POPULATIONS UNDER DIFFERENT EXPOSURE , 2007 .

[11]  Susanne Elizabeth Carroll,et al.  Input and Evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition , 2001 .

[12]  R. Ellis MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[13]  William Snyder,et al.  Child Language: The Parametric Approach , 2007 .

[14]  周彬彬,et al.  Interlanguage : forty years later , 2014 .

[15]  N. Ellis REFLECTIONS ON FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN LANGUAGE PROCESSING , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[16]  Bill VanPatten The Two Faces of SLA: Mental Representation and Skill , 2010 .

[17]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[18]  Norman Segalowitz,et al.  Automaticity and Second Languages , 2008 .

[19]  Bill VanPatten Chapter 1. Mental representation and skill in instructed SLA , 2013 .

[20]  Maria Nella Carminati,et al.  The processing of Italian subject pronouns , 2002 .

[21]  Ana Teresa Pérez-Leroux,et al.  Null anaphora in Spanish second language acquisition: probabilistic versus generative approaches , 1999 .

[22]  S. P. Corder THE SIGNIFICANCE OF LEARNER'S ERRORS , 1967 .

[23]  Thomas Roeper,et al.  Minimalism and Language Acquisition , 2011 .

[24]  Florencia Giglio Henshaw,et al.  Effects of Feedback Timing in SLA: A Computer-Assisted Study on the Spanish Subjunctive , 2011 .

[25]  R. Schmidt Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Second Language Fluency , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[26]  Kevin R. Gregg SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND UNIVERSAL GRAMMAR , 2004, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[27]  Andrew Radford,et al.  句法学:最简方案导论 = Syntax : a minimalist introduction , 1997 .

[28]  S. Pinker The Language Instinct , 1994 .

[29]  John R. Anderson Learning and memory: An integrated approach, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[30]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[31]  Bill VanPatten,et al.  Cross-linguistic variation and the acquisition of pronominal reference in L2 Spanish , 2011 .

[32]  N. D. Jong CAN SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR BE LEARNED THROUGH LISTENING?: An Experimental Study , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[33]  Joyce Bruhn de Garavito,et al.  Subject/object asymmetries in the grammar of bilingual and monolingual Spanish speakers: Evidence against connectionism , 2011 .

[34]  K. Kanno Consistency and variation in second language acquisition , 1998 .

[35]  G. Carlson Determinerless noun phrases , 1999 .

[36]  Roumyana Slabakova,et al.  Meaning in the second language , 2008 .

[37]  J. Hulstijn THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ISSUES IN THE STUDY OF IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT SECOND-LANGUAGE LEARNING: Introduction , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Almeida Jacqueline Toribio Setting parametric limits on dialectal variation in Spanish , 2000 .

[39]  Bill VanPatten,et al.  Missing verbal inflections as a representational problem: Evidence from self-paced reading , 2012 .

[40]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[41]  Charles D. Yang Universal Grammar, statistics or both? , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[42]  R. Jackendoff Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[43]  S. Krashen Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning , 1988 .

[44]  Mario Montalbetti,et al.  After binding : on the interpretation of pronouns , 1984 .

[45]  Noam Chomsky Of Minds and Language , 2007, Biolinguistics.

[46]  Barbara C. Scholz,et al.  Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments , 2002 .

[47]  Bill Van Patten The Two Faces of SLA: Mental Representation and Skill , 2010 .

[48]  Bradley L. Pritchett Grammatical Competence and Parsing Performance , 1992 .

[49]  Jason Rothman,et al.  Why All Counter-Evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis in Second Language Acquisition Is not Equal or Problematic , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[50]  Maria Teresa Guasti,et al.  Language acquisition : the growth of grammar , 2002 .

[51]  Helen Smith Cairns,et al.  Subject Pronouns in Child Spanish andContinuity of Reference , 2009 .

[52]  Jan H. Hulstijn,et al.  Theoretical and empirical issues in the study of implicit and explicit second-language learning , 2005 .