Assessing the relative influence of journals in a citation network

Some journals are perceived as sources of knowledge; others serve as storers of knowledge. Learning the strengths and persuasions of journals is of value to academia, scholars, and publishers.

[1]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for MIS scholars , 1997, CACM.

[2]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for information systems scholars: III , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[3]  Soongoo Hong,et al.  Objective quality ranking of computing journals , 2003, CACM.

[4]  T. W. Leigh,et al.  Assessing the Quality Ranking of the Journal of Advertising, 1986–1997 , 1999 .

[5]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Importance and similarity in the evolving citation network of the International Journal of Research in Marketing , 1999 .

[6]  Nikolaos A. Mylonopoulos,et al.  Global perceptions of IS journals , 2001 .

[7]  Bill C. Hardgrave,et al.  Forums for management information systems scholars , 1995, CACM.

[8]  Mark Von Tress.  Statistical Models for Ordinal Variables , 1995 .

[9]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  LEM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data. Users manual , 1997 .

[10]  R. Pieters,et al.  Who talks to whom? Intra-and interdisciplinary communication of economics journals , 2002 .

[11]  Jeroen K. Vermunt,et al.  'EM: A general program for the analysis of categorical data 1 , 1997 .

[12]  K. Peffers,et al.  Identifying and Evaluating the Universe of Outlets for Information Systems Research: Ranking the Journals , 2003 .

[13]  Nikolaos A. Mylonopoulos,et al.  On site: global perceptions of IS journals , 2001, CACM.

[14]  William M. Shaw,et al.  Information theory and scientific communication , 1981, Scientometrics.

[15]  Girish N. Punj,et al.  Cluster Analysis in Marketing Research: Review and Suggestions for Application , 1983 .