Ovarian Tumor Characterization using 3D Ultrasound

Among gynecological malignancies, ovarian cancer is the most frequent cause of death. Preoperative determination of whether a tumor is benign or malignant has often been found to be difficult. Because of such inconclusive findings from ultrasound images and other tests, many patients with benign conditions have been offered unnecessary surgeries thereby increasing patient anxiety and healthcare cost. The key objective of our work is to develop an adjunct Computer Aided Diagnostic (CAD) technique that uses ultrasound images of the ovary and image mining algorithms to accurately classify benign and malignant ovarian tumor images. In this algorithm, we extract texture features based on Local Binary Patterns (LBP) and Laws Texture Energy (LTE) and use them to build and train a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. Our technique was validated using 1000 benign and 1000 malignant images, and we obtained a high accuracy of 99.9% using a SVM classifier with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) kernel. The high accuracy can be attributed to the determination of the novel combination of the 16 texture based features that quantify the subtle changes in the images belonging to both classes. The proposed algorithm has the following characteristics: cost-effectiveness, complete automation, easy deployment, and good end-user comprehensibility. We have also developed a novel integrated index, Ovarian Cancer Index (OCI), which is a combination of the texture features, to present the physicians with a more transparent adjunct technique for ovarian tumor classification.

[1]  Baochang Zhang,et al.  Local Derivative Pattern Versus Local Binary Pattern: Face Recognition With High-Order Local Pattern Descriptor , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  Kenneth I. Laws,et al.  Rapid Texture Identification , 1980, Optics & Photonics.

[3]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[4]  Shu Liao,et al.  Dominant Local Binary Patterns for Texture Classification , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Multiresolution Gray-Scale and Rotation Invariant Texture Classification with Local Binary Patterns , 2002, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions , 1996, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  Mitja Lenic,et al.  Segmentation of Ovarian Ultrasound Images Using Single Template Cellular Neural Networks Trained with Support Vector Machines , 2007, Twentieth IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS'07).

[8]  Feng Su,et al.  The early detection of ovarian cancer: from traditional methods to proteomics. Can we really do better than serum CA-125? , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  Mohammad Hassan Moradi,et al.  Extracting Efficient Fuzzy If-Then Rules from Mass Spectra of Blood Samples to Early Diagnosis of Ovarian Cancer , 2007, 2007 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Bioinformatics and Computational Biology.

[10]  Steven J Skates,et al.  Performance of ultrasound as a second line test to serum CA125 in ovarian cancer screening , 2014, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[11]  Gunnar Rätsch,et al.  An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms , 2001, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[12]  K A Baggerly,et al.  New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond , 2005, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[13]  S. Zaidi,et al.  Fifty years of progress in gynecologic ultrasound , 2007, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[14]  Yuanyuan Wang,et al.  Automated detection of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome from ultrasound images , 2008, EMBC 2008.

[15]  Cheol Min Park,et al.  Benign ovarian tumors with solid and cystic components that mimic malignancy. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Jagath C. Rajapakse,et al.  Ovarian cancer classification with missing data , 2002, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing, 2002. ICONIP '02..

[17]  Wenxue Hong,et al.  Feature Extraction and Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Proteomic Mass Spectra , 2008, 2008 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Md. Mahmudur Rahman,et al.  Retrieval and classification of ultrasound images of ovarian cysts combining texture features and histogram moments , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[19]  Christopher J. C. Burges,et al.  A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition , 1998, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[20]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[21]  Jyothi R. Tegnoor,et al.  Recognition of follicles in ultrasound images of ovaries using geometric features , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Engineering.

[22]  Xianghua Xie,et al.  Handbook of Texture Analysis , 2008 .

[23]  Prabir Bhattacharya,et al.  Selection of optimal texture descriptors for retrieving ultrasound medical images , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro.

[24]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  AUTOMATIC COMPUTER-BASED TRACINGS (ACT) IN LONGITUDINAL 2-D ULTRASOUND IMAGES USING DIFFERENT SCANNERS , 2009 .

[25]  Maria Petrou,et al.  Image processing - dealing with texture , 2020 .

[26]  A. V.DavidSánchez,et al.  Advanced support vector machines and kernel methods , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[27]  Hiok Chai Quek,et al.  Ovarian Cancer Diagnosis with Complementary Learning Fuzzy Neural Network , 2022 .