Simulating Moral Actions: An Investigation of Personal Force in Virtual Moral Dilemmas

Advances in Virtual Reality (VR) technologies allow the investigation of simulated moral actions in visually immersive environments. Using a robotic manipulandum and an interactive sculpture, we now also incorporate realistic haptic feedback into virtual moral simulations. In two experiments, we found that participants responded with greater utilitarian actions in virtual and haptic environments when compared to traditional questionnaire assessments of moral judgments. In experiment one, when incorporating a robotic manipulandum, we found that the physical power of simulated utilitarian responses (calculated as the product of force and speed) was predicted by individual levels of psychopathy. In experiment two, which integrated an interactive and life-like sculpture of a human into a VR simulation, greater utilitarian actions continued to be observed. Together, these results support a disparity between simulated moral action and moral judgment. Overall this research combines state-of-the-art virtual reality, robotic movement simulations, and realistic human sculptures, to enhance moral paradigms that are often contextually impoverished. As such, this combination provides a better assessment of simulated moral action, and illustrates the embodied nature of morally-relevant actions.

[1]  Mel Slater,et al.  Confronting a moral dilemma in virtual reality: a pilot study , 2011, BCS HCI.

[2]  F. François,et al.  Helicobacter pylori Eradication Causes Perturbation of the Human Gut Microbiome in Young Adults , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment , 2009, Cognition.

[4]  K A Kiehl,et al.  Assessing psychopathic attributes in a noninstitutionalized population. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Christine Deruelle,et al.  High levels of psychopathic traits alters moral choice but not moral judgment , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[7]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[8]  G. Riva,et al.  Virtual Reality for Research in Social Neuroscience , 2017, Brain sciences.

[9]  Gordon Pipa,et al.  Forced-choice decision-making in modified trolley dilemma situations: a virtual reality and eye tracking study , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[10]  F. Cushman Action, Outcome, and Value , 2013, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[11]  Maaike Cima,et al.  Psychopaths know right from wrong but don't care. , 2010, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[12]  Indrajeet Patil Trait psychopathy and utilitarian moral judgement: The mediating role of action aversion , 2015 .

[13]  Toshiaki Imada,et al.  Theta brain rhythms index perceptual narrowing in infant speech perception , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[14]  M. Hauser,et al.  The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment , 2006, Psychological science.

[15]  C. Navarrete,et al.  Virtual morality: emotion and action in a simulated three-dimensional "trolley problem". , 2012, Emotion.

[16]  Gideon Keren,et al.  The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgement and decision making , 2015 .

[17]  Ian S. Howard,et al.  Virtual Morality: Transitioning from Moral Judgment to Moral Action? , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  Olivier Oullier,et al.  Discrepancies between Judgment and Choice of Action in Moral Dilemmas , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[19]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas , 2014, Social neuroscience.

[20]  Dean Mobbs,et al.  What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices , 2012, Cognition.

[21]  J. Thomson Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. , 1976, The Monist.

[22]  Fiery Cushman,et al.  Simulating murder: the aversion to harmful action. , 2012, Emotion.

[23]  Phillip Wolff,et al.  Causal reasoning with forces , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  A modular planar robotic manipulandum with end-point torque control , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  B. Trémolière,et al.  The Dark Triad of personality and utilitarian moral judgment: The mediating role of Honesty/Humility and Harm/Care , 2014 .

[26]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Neuroanatomical basis of concern-based altruism in virtual environment , 2017, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  C. Navarrete,et al.  Killing for the greater good: Action aversion and the emotional inhibition of harm in moral dilemmas , 2017 .

[28]  Guillaume A. Rousselet,et al.  Robust Correlation Analyses: False Positive and Power Validation Using a New Open Source Matlab Toolbox , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[29]  P. Grant,et al.  Dopaminergic foundations of schizotypy as measured by the German version of the Oxford-Liverpool Inventory of Feelings and Experiences (O-LIFE)—a suitable endophenotype of schizophrenia , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[30]  G. Fisone,et al.  Acquisition and expression of conditioned taste aversion differentially affects extracellular signal regulated kinase and glutamate receptor phosphorylation in rat prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens , 2014, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[31]  C. Pernet,et al.  The Role of Pitch and Timbre in Voice Gender Categorization , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[32]  M. Ashton,et al.  The HEXACO–60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality , 2009, Journal of personality assessment.

[33]  M. Sarlo,et al.  It's immoral, but I'd do it! Psychopathy traits affect decision‐making in sacrificial dilemmas and in everyday moral situations , 2017, British journal of psychology.

[34]  F. Nietzsche,et al.  Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for Everyone and Nobody , 2008 .

[35]  Daniel M. Bartels,et al.  Moral Judgment and Decision Making , 2014 .

[36]  T. Parsons Virtual Reality for Enhanced Ecological Validity and Experimental Control in the Clinical, Affective and Social Neurosciences , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  J. Donnelly Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy , 1979 .