Human–nature connection : a multidisciplinary review

In sustainability science calls are increasing for humanity to (re-)connect with nature, yet no systematic synthesis of the empirical literature on human–nature connection (HNC) exists. We reviewed 475 publications on HNC and found that most research has concentrated on individuals at local scales, often leaving ‘nature’ undefined. Cluster analysis identified three subgroups of publications: first, HNC as mind, dominated by the use of psychometric scales, second, HNC as experience, characterised by observation and qualitative analysis; and third, HNC as place, emphasising place attachment and reserve visitation. To address the challenge of connecting humanity with nature, future HNC scholarship must pursue cross-fertilization of methods and approaches, extend research beyond individuals, local scales, and Western societies, and increase guidance for sustainability transformations.

[1]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  The future of sustainability science: a solutions-oriented research agenda , 2013, Sustainability Science.

[2]  Henrik von Wehrden,et al.  Assessing sustainable biophysical human–nature connectedness at regional scales , 2017 .

[3]  Anne-Caroline Prévot-Julliard,et al.  Observations of Everyday Biodiversity: a New Perspective for Conservation? , 2012 .

[4]  Thaddeus R. Miller,et al.  Epistemological Pluralism: Reorganizing Interdisciplinary Research , 2008 .

[5]  L. Beckley,et al.  The Effect of Place Attachment on Pro-environment Behavioral Intentions of Visitors to Coastal Natural Area Tourist Destinations , 2015 .

[6]  W. J. Boonstra,et al.  Dwelling in the biosphere: exploring an embodied human–environment connection in resilience thinking , 2016, Sustainability Science.

[7]  P. Ehrlich,et al.  IMPACT OF POPULATION GROWTH , 1971, Science.

[8]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet , 2015, Science.

[9]  D. Lang,et al.  Leverage points for sustainability transformation , 2017, Ambio.

[10]  Un-Habitat,et al.  neW URBAn AGendA , 2016 .

[11]  R. Pyle,et al.  Nature matrix: reconnecting people and nature , 2003, Oryx.

[12]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[13]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[14]  K. Gaston,et al.  Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions , 2016 .

[15]  Alan Wade,et al.  Mind the sustainability gap. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[16]  K. Esler,et al.  Connectedness as a Core Conservation Concern: An Interdisciplinary Review of Theory and a Call for Practice , 2014, Springer Science Reviews.

[17]  Kate Raworth,et al.  A Safe and Just Space for Humanity: Can we live within the doughnut? , 2012 .

[18]  Ralf Seppelt,et al.  Humanity’s distance to nature: time for environmental austerity? , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[19]  G. Daily,et al.  The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health , 2012, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[20]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[21]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Reconnecting to the Biosphere , 2011, AMBIO.

[22]  Kerstin Böck,et al.  A model integrating social-cultural concepts of nature into frameworks of interaction between social and natural systems , 2018 .

[23]  Steven A. Murphy,et al.  The Nature Relatedness Scale , 2009 .

[24]  Rachelle K. Gould,et al.  Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Banny Banerjee,et al.  Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation , 2011, AMBIO.

[26]  Andrea Berardi,et al.  Learning from one another: evaluating the impact of horizontal knowledge exchange for environmental management and governance , 2016 .

[27]  James J. Gross,et al.  The benefits of nature experience: Improved affect and cognition , 2015 .

[28]  Jacopo A. Baggio,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Social-Ecological Resilience through the Lens of the Social Sciences: Contributions, Critical Reflections, and Constructive Debate Studying the complexity of change: toward an analytical framework for understanding deliberate social-ecological transfo , 2014 .

[29]  Elisabeth Conrad,et al.  A literature review of connectedness to nature and its potential for environmental management. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[30]  D. Simberloff,et al.  The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  F. Mayer,et al.  The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature ☆ , 2004 .

[32]  Andrew Kliskey,et al.  Weaving Indigenous and sustainability sciences to diversify our methods , 2015, Sustainability Science.

[33]  Yuki Yoshida,et al.  Exploring empirical typologies of human–nature relationships and linkages to the ecosystem services concept , 2013 .

[34]  C. Folke,et al.  Reconnecting Cities to the Biosphere: Stewardship of Green Infrastructure and Urban Ecosystem Services , 2014, AMBIO.

[35]  F. Kaiser,et al.  Appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection: How stable are these attitudes and which comes first? , 2014 .

[36]  Erle C. Ellis,et al.  Bright spots : seeds of a good Anthropocene , 2016 .

[37]  Tara L. Teel,et al.  Considerations in Representing Human Individuals in Social-Ecological Models , 2014 .

[38]  Peter H. Kahn,et al.  Living in cities, naturally , 2016, Science.

[39]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature? , 2013, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[40]  G. Evans,et al.  Young Children's Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors , 2007 .

[41]  J. Rockström,et al.  Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science , 2016 .