A comprehensive framework tool for performance assessment of NBS for hydro-meteorological risk management

[1]  M. Giugni,et al.  Enhancing the Urban Resilience to Flood Risk Through a Decision Support Tool for the LID-BMPs Optimal Design , 2022, Water Resources Management.

[2]  Gerd Lupp,et al.  Assessment of NBSs effectiveness for flood risk management: The Isar River case study , 2021, Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-Aqua.

[3]  Carl C. Anderson,et al.  Public Acceptance of Nature-Based Solutions for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction: Survey Findings From Three Study Sites in Europe , 2021, Frontiers in Environmental Science.

[4]  M. Disse,et al.  A meta-analysis of the value of ecosystem services of floodplains for the Danube River Basin. , 2021, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  Leonardo F. Arias-Rodriguez,et al.  Integrated Valuation of Nature-Based Solutions Using TESSA: Three Floodplain Restoration Studies in the Danube Catchment , 2021 .

[6]  Amy M. P. Oen,et al.  Implementing Nature-Based Solutions in Rural Landscapes: Barriers Experienced in the PHUSICOS Project , 2021 .

[7]  Gerd Lupp,et al.  Innovation in NBS Co-Design and Implementation , 2020, Sustainability.

[8]  S. Bernardie,et al.  Platform Dedicated to Nature-Based Solutions for Risk Reduction and Environmental Issues in Hilly and Mountainous Lands , 2020, Sustainability.

[9]  S. Pauleit,et al.  Living Labs—A Concept for Co-Designing Nature-Based Solutions , 2020, Sustainability.

[10]  Prashant Kumar,et al.  A review of hydro-meteorological hazard, vulnerability, and risk assessment frameworks and indicators in the context of nature-based solutions , 2020, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[11]  Gerd Lupp,et al.  Nature-Based Solutions (NBSs) Application for Hydro-Environment Enhancement. A Case Study of the Isar River (DE) , 2020, Environmental Sciences Proceedings.

[12]  S. Di Sabatino,et al.  Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction , 2020, Bulletin of Atmospheric Science and Technology.

[13]  Zoran Vojinovic,et al.  Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction: a state-of-the-art review of the research area , 2019, Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences.

[14]  A. Pagano,et al.  Enhancing nature-based solutions acceptance through stakeholders' engagement in co-benefits identification and trade-offs analysis. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[15]  W. Botzen,et al.  An assessment of best practices of extreme weather insurance and directions for a more resilient society , 2020, Environmental Hazards.

[16]  F. Porcù,et al.  Hydro-meteorological risk assessment methods and management by nature-based solutions , 2019, Science of The Total Environment.

[17]  Z. Kapelan,et al.  Exploring trade-offs among the multiple benefits of green-blue-grey infrastructure for urban flood mitigation. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[18]  A. Sharpley,et al.  Multi-stakeholders’ preference for best management practices based on environmental awareness , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[19]  Danilo Montesi,et al.  Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological hazards: Revised concepts, classification schemes and databases. , 2019, Environmental research.

[20]  P. Stephan,et al.  DESIGNING A RESILIENT WATERSCAPE USING A LIVING LAB AND CATALYZING POLYCENTRIC GOVERNANCE , 2019, Landscape Architecture Frontiers.

[21]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Mapping heat-related health risks of elderly citizens in mountainous area: A case study of Chongqing, China. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  Jaroslav Mysiak,et al.  An assessment framework for climate-proof nature-based solutions. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  L. Cimorelli,et al.  The Effect of Geological Heterogeneity and Groundwater Table Depth on the Hydraulic Performance of Stormwater Infiltration Facilities , 2019, Water Resources Management.

[24]  A. Veról,et al.  An integrated quantitative framework to support design of resilient alternatives to manage urban flood risks , 2018, Journal of Flood Risk Management.

[25]  J. Järvelä,et al.  How vegetation can aid in coping with river management challenges: A brief review , 2018, Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology.

[26]  Georgia Destouni,et al.  Nature-based solutions for flood-drought risk mitigation in vulnerable urbanizing parts of East-Africa , 2018, Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health.

[27]  M. Giugni,et al.  Optimal Design of LIDs in Urban Stormwater Systems Using a Harmony-Search Decision Support System , 2018, Water Resources Management.

[28]  N. Wright,et al.  The influence of floodplain restoration on flow and sediment dynamics in an urban river , 2018 .

[29]  Nicolas Faivre,et al.  Translating the Sendai Framework into action: The EU approach to ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction , 2017, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[30]  Madhu Sudan Acharya,et al.  Analytical Approach to Design Vegetative Crib Walls , 2018, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.

[31]  Davide Geneletti,et al.  A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas , 2017 .

[32]  Sander Jacobs,et al.  Nature‐Based Solutions for Europe's Sustainable Development , 2017 .

[33]  Fabio Masi,et al.  Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits , 2016 .

[34]  Newton Moura,et al.  Best management practices as an alternative for flood and urban storm water control in a changing climate , 2016 .

[35]  Udo Nehren,et al.  Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation in Practice , 2016 .

[36]  Reeho Kim,et al.  Low Impact Development Practices: A Review of Current Research and Recommendations for Future Directions , 2015 .

[37]  V. Murray,et al.  The Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction: Renewing the Global Commitment to People’s Resilience, Health, and Well-being , 2015, International Journal of Disaster Risk Science.

[38]  Hans Keune,et al.  Nature-based Solutions : New Influence for Environmental Management and Research in Europe , 2015 .

[39]  Marco Cinelli,et al.  Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment , 2014 .

[40]  Marina Bergen Jensen,et al.  A planning framework for sustainable urban drainage systems , 2012 .

[41]  Franz Makeschin,et al.  A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning , 2012 .

[42]  C. Körner,et al.  Mountain biodiversity , 2011 .

[43]  Russell K. Schutt,et al.  Research Methods in Education , 2011 .

[44]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[45]  K. Ingold,et al.  Climate change in mountain regions: how local communities adapt to extreme events , 2010 .

[46]  John J. Clague,et al.  Natural hazards, extreme events, and mountain topography , 2009 .

[47]  Martin Beniston,et al.  Linking extreme climate events and economic impacts: Examples from the Swiss Alps , 2007 .

[48]  F. Sarmiento.  Key Issues for Mountain Areas , 2006 .

[49]  S. Ranji Ranjithan,et al.  Detention Pond Design and Land Use Planning for Watershed Management , 2003 .

[50]  K. Lampe.  Rural Development in Mountainous Areas: Why Progress Is So Difficult , 1983 .