Experimental and Numerical Validation of Selective Weakening Retrofit for Existing Non-Ductile R.C. Frames

The development of cheap, whilst effective and relatively non-invasive structural retrofit techniques for existing non-ductile reinforced concrete (RC) structures still remains the most challenging issue for a wide implementation on a macro scale. Seismic retrofit is too often being confused as purely structural strengthening. As part of a six-years national project on “Seismic retrofit solutions for NZ multi-storey building”, focus has been given at the University of Canterbury on the development of a counter-intuitive retrofit strategy for earthquake vulnerable existing rc frame, based on a “selective weakening” (SW) approach. After an overview of the SW concept, this paper presents the experimental and numerical validation of a SW retrofit strategy for earthquake vulnerable existing RC frame with particular focus on the exterior beam-column (b-c) joints. The exterior b-c joint is a critically vulnerable region in many existing pre-1970s RC frames. By selectively weakening the beam by cutting the bottom longitudinal reinforcements and/or adding external pre-stressing to the b-c joint, a more desirable inelastic mechanism can be attained, leading to improved global seismic performance. The so-called SW retrofit is implemented on four 2/3-scaled exterior RC b-c joint subassemblies, tested under quasi-static cyclic loading at the University of Canterbury. Complemented by refined 3D Finite Element (FE) models and dynamic time-history analyses results, the experimental results have shown the potential of a simple and cost-effective yet structurally efficient structural rehabilitation technique. The research also demonstrated the potential of advanced 3D fracture-mechanics-based microplane concrete modelling for refined FE analysis of non-ductile RC b-c joints. Keyword: Selective weakening, seismic retrofit / rehabilitation, concrete beamcolumn joint, modelling concrete, 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The recent publications of technical guidelines [11, 22], FEMA 356 pre-standard [10] and international standards (Eurocode8-Part 3 [8] the ASCE-SEI 41 standard[2]) represent significant progress and address crucial needs in seismic rehabilitation and retrofit for modern urban society. It is widely recognised that poorly detailed nonductile reinforced concrete (RC) moment-resisting frames pose significant risks to urban population in seismic zones. Research on the seismic performance of pre706 ATC & SEI 2009 Conference on Improving the Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings and Other Structures

[1]  B. Taranath Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2004 .

[2]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Existing Hollowcore Seating Connection Seismic Behaviour Pre and Post Retrofit Intervention , 2007 .

[3]  Sri Sritharan,et al.  ENHANCING SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF BRIDGE CAP BEAM-TO-COLUMN JOINTS USING PRESTRESSING , 1999 .

[4]  Joseph P. Nicoletti,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[5]  Joško Ožbolt,et al.  Microplane model for concrete with relaxed kinematic constraint , 2001 .

[6]  John B. Mander,et al.  Seismic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Designed Only for Gravity Loads: Experimental Performance of Subassemblages , 1994 .

[7]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Non-Invasive retrofit of existing RC frames designed for gravity loads only , 2003 .

[8]  마춘경 ACI PS 콘크리트 구조설계규준(역) - ACI규준중의 PS 조항발췌 ( ACI STANDARD BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE(ACI318-63) ) , 1967 .

[9]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Experimental test on a three storey reinforced concrete frame designed for gravity only , 2002 .

[10]  A. Carr,et al.  Modelling of shear hinge mechanism in poorly detailed RC beam-column joints , 2003 .

[11]  Paolo,et al.  FINITE ELEMENT PROGRAM FOR STRUCTURE ANALYSIS , .

[12]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  3D analysis of seismic response of RC beam-column exterior joints before and after retrofit , 2009 .

[13]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Experimental Investigations of a Selective Weakening Approach for the Seismic Retrofit of R.C. Walls , 2007 .

[14]  John B. Mander,et al.  Seismic Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures Designed for Gravity Loads: Performance of Structural System , 1995 .

[15]  M. Hamahara,et al.  Design for Shear of Prestressed Concrete Beam-Column Joint Cores , 2007 .

[16]  Stephen Pessiki,et al.  Implications of Experiments on the Seismic Behavior of Gravity Load Designed RC Beam-to-Column Connections , 1996 .

[17]  Stefano Pampanin Controversial aspects in seismic assessment and retrofit of structures in modern times: understanding and implementing lessons from ancient heritage , 2006 .

[18]  Stefano Pampanin,et al.  Selective weakening techniques for retrofit of existing reinforced concrete structures , 2008 .