Comparison of analytical models for predicting cogging torque in surface-mounted PM machines

The paper compares five analytical models for predicting the cogging torque in surface-mounted permanent magnet machines, viz. lateral force (LF), complex permeance (CP), and combined CP models, together with subdomain (SD) models based on single slot/pole and exact SD model. The models are evaluated for the cogging torque waveforms and the prediction of optimal pole-arc to pole-pitch and slot-opening to slot-pitch ratios for cogging torque reduction. It shows that all analytical models predict similar waveforms but different magnitudes. The performance of the LF model is very stable and it is very accurate for slot-opening to slot-pitch ratio less than 0.2, but tends to underestimate above this. Both CP models have similar and relatively lower accuracy and usually overestimate the cogging torque due to neglecting the deformations of magnets and the path to predict the airgap flux density in the conformal mapping. The SD models have high accuracy while the exact SD model is most accurate by accounting for mutual influence between slots.

[1]  Z.Q. Zhu,et al.  Comparison of alternate analytical models for predicting cogging torque in surface-mounted permanent magnet machines , 2008, 2008 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference.

[2]  Z. Zhu,et al.  Improved analytical model for predicting the magnetic field distribution in brushless permanent-magnet machines , 2002 .

[3]  C. Espanet,et al.  Analytical Solution of the Magnetic Field in Permanent-Magnet Motors Taking Into Account Slotting Effect: No-Load Vector Potential and Flux Density Calculation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[4]  Quan Jiang,et al.  An improved analytical solution for predicting magnetic forces in permanent magnet motors , 2008 .

[5]  Z.Q. Zhu,et al.  Analytical Methods for Minimizing Cogging Torque in Permanent-Magnet Machines , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[6]  Z.J. Liu,et al.  Analytical Solution of Air-Gap Field in Permanent-Magnet Motors Taking Into Account the Effect of Pole Transition Over Slots , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[7]  Z.J. Liu,et al.  Accurate Prediction of Magnetic Field and Magnetic Forces in Permanent Magnet Motors Using an Analytical Solution , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[8]  Caroline A. Ross,et al.  Major hysteresis loop modeling of two-dimensional arrays of single domain particles , 2000 .

[9]  D. Howe,et al.  Influence of design parameters on cogging torque in permanent magnet machines , 1997, 1997 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference Record.

[10]  W. Jeong,et al.  Cogging torque and acoustic noise reduction in permanent magnet motors by teeth pairing , 2000 .

[11]  T. Lipo,et al.  Analytical calculation of magnetic field distribution in the slotted air gap of a surface permanent-magnet motor using complex relative air-gap permeance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[12]  U. Kim,et al.  Magnetic field calculation in permanent magnet motors with rotor eccentricity: without slotting effect , 1998 .

[13]  T. Lipo,et al.  Analytical Solution for Cogging Torque in Surface Permanent-Magnet Motors Using Conformal Mapping , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[14]  D. Howe,et al.  Analytical prediction of the cogging torque in radial-field permanent magnet brushless motors , 1992 .

[15]  Deug-Woo Lee,et al.  Various design techniques to reduce cogging torque by controlling energy variation in permanent magnet motors , 2001 .