Early diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison of digit 1 with wrist and distoproximal ratio.

Our objective in this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) from digit 1 to wrist with those of the distoproximal (D/P) ratio of the median SNCV from palm to digit 3/palm to wrist in the diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) by using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. To achieve this objective, we studied prospectively (January 1997-October 1998) 370 patients referred for CTS. One hundred forty-two patients (38.4%) with moderate to severe CTS and 15 patients (4.1%) with multiple (> or = 3) compressive neuropathies in upper limbs with subclinical peripheral neuropathy were excluded. The remaining 213 patients (302 hands with mild CTS; 167 women; mean age, 50 y +/- 12 y) and 38 controls (71 hands; 25 women; mean age, 47 y +/- 13 y) had median and ulnar nerve conduction studies. ROC curves were constructed for median SNCV digit 1 to wrist and median SNCV D/P ratio from the patients' and controls' data. The median SNCV at < or = 45.9 m/s, corresponding to an optimal cutoff point on ROC curve, discriminated 89.5% of mild CTS from controls with specificity of 98.6%. The median D/P ratio at > or = 1.12, corresponding to an optimal cutoff point on ROC curve, discriminated 67.2% of mild CTS from controls with specificity of 97.2%. Of the 10.3% (31/302) of hands in which digit 1 to wrist was within normal limits at the selected optimal cutoff value (< or = 45.9 ms), 7% (21/302) had an abnormal D/P ratio (> or = 1.12), and 3.3% (10/302) had a normal electrophysiologic examination. The likelihood ratio (true-positive ratio to false-positive ratio, assessing the discriminative power of a test) of the median SNCV digit 1 to wrist, at an optimal point on ROC curve (63.9), was higher than that of the median SNCV D/P ratio (23.9, chi2 = 36.9, P < .001). These findings suggest that the median SNCV digit 1 to wrist is more sensitive than the median SNCV D/P ratio in the diagnosis of mild CTS.

[1]  P. Seror Orthodromic inching test in mild carpal tunnel syndrome , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[2]  D. Yocum The many faces of carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1998, Archives of internal medicine.

[3]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  AAEM minimonograph #26: The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[4]  M. Andary,et al.  Comparison of sensory mid-palm studies to other techniques in carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1996, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  W. Trojaborg,et al.  Value of latency measurements to the small palm muscles compared to other conduction parameters in the carpal tunnel syndrome , 1996, Muscle & nerve.

[6]  P. Tonali,et al.  A useful electrophysiologic parameter for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome , 1996, Muscle & nerve.

[7]  S. Rutkove,et al.  Comparison of digital sensory studies in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome , 1995, Muscle & nerve.

[8]  T. Kuntzer Carpal tunnel syndrome in 100 patients: Sensitivity, specificity of multi-neurophysiological procedures and estimation of axonal loss of motor, sensory and sympathetic median nerve fibers , 1994, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[9]  M. H. Ross,et al.  The median–ulnar latency difference studies are comparable in mild carpal tunnel syndrome , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  M Schulzer,et al.  Diagnostic tests: A statistical review , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  Michael H. Rivner Statistical errors and their effect on electrodiagnostic medicine , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  Y. So,et al.  Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[13]  A. Eisen,et al.  Issue & Opinions: Receiver operating characterist curve anic analysis in the prediction of carpal tunnel syndrome: A model for reporting Electrophysiological data , 1993 .

[14]  G. Wieneke,et al.  Subclinical diabetic polyneuropathy: early detection of involvement of different nerve fibre types. , 1993, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  M. Lauritzen,et al.  Orthodromic sensory conduction along the ring finger in normal subjects and in patients with a carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  C. Vial,et al.  Clinical validation of antidromic stimulation of the ring finger in early electrodiagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Swash,et al.  Carpal tunnel syndrome : Which finger should be tested? An analysis of sensory conduction in digital branches of the median nerve , 1990, Muscle & nerve.

[18]  W. Pease,et al.  Median to radial latency difference test in mild carpal tunnel syndrome , 1989, Muscle & nerve.

[19]  R. Lovelace,et al.  Ring finger testing in carpal tunnel syndrome: A comparative study of diagnostic utility , 1989, Muscle & nerve.

[20]  Clifford Jc,et al.  Electrodiagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1989 .

[21]  C B Begg,et al.  A General Regression Methodology for ROC Curve Estimation , 1988, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[22]  J. Valls,et al.  Orthodromic study of the sensory fibers innervating the fourth finger , 1988, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  J. Stevens AAEE minimonograph #26: The electrodiagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome , 1987, Muscle & nerve.

[24]  S. L. Visser,et al.  Comparison of Hoffmann reflex with quantitative assessment of cutaneous sensation in diabetic neuropathy , 1986, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[25]  K. Mills Orthodromic sensory action potentials from palmar stimulation in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1985, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[26]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[27]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[28]  E. Keeler,et al.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  F. Buchthal,et al.  Electrophysiological findings in entrapment of the median nerve at wrist and elbow , 1974, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[30]  F. Buchthal,et al.  Sensory conduction from digit to palm and from palm to wrist in the carpal tunnel syndrome , 1971, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[31]  S SUNDERLAND,et al.  The intraneural topography of the radial, median and ulnar nerves. , 1945, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[32]  I. C. Metallinos,et al.  Early diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: comparison of sensory conduction studies of four fingers. , 1998, Muscle & nerve.

[33]  E. Logigian,et al.  Sensitivity of the three median-to-ulnar comparative tests in diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[34]  A. Eisen,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in the prediction of carpal tunnel syndrome: a model for reporting electrophysiological data. , 1993, Muscle & nerve.

[35]  J. C. Clifford,et al.  Electrodiagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1989, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  J R Beck,et al.  The use of relative operating characteristic (ROC) curves in test performance evaluation. , 1986, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[37]  G. Hermann,et al.  Comparison of thyrotropin assays by relative operating characteristic analysis. , 1986, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[38]  D. Ayyar,et al.  The carpal tunnel syndrome: electrophysiological aspects of 639 symptomatic extremities. , 1985, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  J. Kimura,et al.  The carpal tunnel syndrome: localization of conduction abnormalities within the distal segment of the median nerve. , 1979, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .

[41]  G. S. Phalen The diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. , 1968, Cleveland Clinic quarterly.