Mechanical mastication as a fuels treatment in southeastern forests

Mastication is an increasingly common fuels treatment that redistributes ‘‘ladder’’ fuels to the forest floor to reduce vertical fuel continuity, crown fire potential, and fireline intensity. Despite its widespread adoption, it remains unclear how mastication impacts fuels, fire behavior, or plant communities  across Southeastern forest ecosystems. We evaluated these effects by reviewing studies conducted across Southeastern pine forests. Mastication is typically applied to reduce fire hazard prior to reintroducing fire to long-unburned sites and to promote desired herbaceous groundcover where woody species have become dominant. Pretreatment fuel conditions varied across the different studies, ultimately leading to variation in post-treatment fuels. Only a few studies have examined fire behavior in masticated fuels and its potential effects. Field-scale burns conducted under mild conditions have resulted in variable fuel consumption and minimal overstory tree mortality. Substantial surface fuel loads in sites with prior stand damage, however, suggests that fire hazard may not be alleviated if sites burned under wildfire conditions. Modeled fire behavior indicates the effectiveness of treatments at reducing potential fire hazard, but verifying predictions under wildfire conditions has not been done. Initial herbaceous response has been positive in some sites, but rapid recovery of woody species indicates the importance of frequent burning to sufficiently restore plant communities and vegetation structure indicative of fire dependent pine forests in the Southeastern US.

[1]  Mark J. Schroeder,et al.  Fire weather: a guide for application of meteorological information to forest fire control operations. , 1970 .

[2]  P. Muir,et al.  Responses of Chaparral and Oak Woodland Plant Communities to Fuel-Reduction Thinning in Southwestern Oregon , 2008 .

[3]  N. Barger,et al.  Effects of fuels reductions on plant communities and soils in a Piñon-juniper woodland. , 2012 .

[4]  D. Eggett,et al.  Plant Establishment in Masticated Utah Juniper Woodlands , 2013 .

[5]  Jesse K. Kreye,et al.  Fire behavior in masticated fuels: A review , 2014 .

[6]  T. Dudley,et al.  Short-Term Vegetation Response Following Mechanical Control of Saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) on the Virgin River, Nevada, USA , 2014, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[7]  Jesse K. Kreye,et al.  Pine cones facilitate ignition of forest floor duff , 2013 .

[8]  Jesse K. Kreye,et al.  Immediate and short-term response of understory fuels following mechanical mastication in a pine flatwoods site of Florida, USA , 2014 .

[9]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  Initial changes in forest structure and understory plant communities following fuel reduction activities in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest , 2007 .

[10]  Jesse K. Kreye,et al.  The effect of mastication on surface fire behaviour, fuels consumption and tree mortality in pine flatwoods of Florida, USA , 2015 .

[11]  Fire Severity and Intensity During Spring Burning in Natural and Masticated Mixed Shrub Woodlands , 2006 .

[12]  E. Knapp,et al.  Understory vegetation response to mechanical mastication and other fuels treatments in a ponderosa pine forest , 2010 .

[13]  Jesse K. Kreye,et al.  Effects of fuel load and moisture content on fire behaviour and heating in masticated litter-dominated fuels , 2013 .

[14]  Susan J. Prichard,et al.  An overview of the fuel characteristic classification system—quantifying, classifying, and creating fuelbeds for resource planning. , 2007 .

[15]  R. Powers,et al.  Lethal soil temperatures during burning of masticated forest residues , 2005 .

[16]  E. Menges,et al.  EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL TREATMENTS AND FIRE ON FLORIDA SCRUB VEGETATION , 2008 .

[17]  E. Knapp,et al.  Behaviour and effects of prescribed fire in masticated fuelbeds , 2011 .

[18]  Jesse K. Kreye,et al.  Effects of particle fracturing and moisture content on fire behaviour in masticated fuelbeds burned in a laboratory , 2011 .

[19]  Aaron D. Stottlemyer,et al.  Prescribed burning and mastication effects on surface fuels in southern pine beetle-killed loblolly pine plantations , 2015 .

[20]  Paul A. Schmalzerl Growth and Recovery of Oak-Saw Pal metto Scrub through Ten Years After Fire , 2010 .

[21]  S. Stephens,et al.  Invasive and native plant responses to shrubland fuel reduction: comparing prescribed fire, mastication, and treatment season , 2009 .

[22]  Jesse K. Kreye,et al.  Moisture desorption in mechanically masticated fuels: effects of particle fracturing and fuelbed compaction , 2012 .

[23]  Gary L. Achtemeier,et al.  Fuels and fire behavior in chipped and unchipped plots: Implications for land management near the wildland/urban interface , 2006 .

[24]  Jason J. Moghaddas,et al.  Initial response of conifer and California black oak seedlings following fuel reduction activities in a Sierra Nevada mixed conifer forest , 2008 .

[25]  D. Brockway,et al.  Vegetation response to midstorey mulching and prescribed burning for wildfire hazard reduction and longleaf pine (Pinus palustris Mill.) ecosystem restoration , 2009 .

[26]  R. Ottmar,et al.  Fuel treatment effectiveness in forests of the upper Atlantic Coastal Plain – An evaluation at two spatial scales , 2012 .