Multi-objective design optimisation of rolling bearings using genetic algorithms

Abstract The design of rolling bearings has to satisfy various constraints, e.g. the geometrical, kinematics and the strength, while delivering excellent performance, long life and high reliability. This invokes the need of an optimal design methodology to achieve these objectives collectively, i.e. the multi-objective optimisation. In this paper, three primary objectives for a rolling bearing, namely, the dynamic capacity (Cd), the static capacity (Cs) and the elastohydrodynamic minimum film thickness (Hmin) have been optimized separately, pair-wise and simultaneously using an advanced multi-objective optimisation algorithm: NSGA II (non-dominated sorting based genetic algorithm). These multiple objectives are performance measures of a rolling bearing, compete among themselves giving us a trade-off region where they become “simultaneously optimal”, i.e. Pareto optimal. A sensitivity analysis of various design parameters has been performed, to see changes in bearing performance parameters, and results show that, except the inner groove curvature radius, no other design parameters have adverse affect on performance parameters.

[1]  Thomas T. Woodson,et al.  Introduction to engineering design , 1966 .

[2]  C. J. Maday,et al.  The Maximum Principle Approach to the Optimum One-Dimensional Journal Bearing , 1970 .

[3]  Changsen Wan,et al.  Analysis of rolling element bearings , 1991 .

[4]  Dong-Hoon Choi,et al.  A Design Method of an Automotive Wheel-Bearing Unit With Discrete Design Variables Using Genetic Algorithms , 2001 .

[5]  Rajiv Tiwari,et al.  Optimum design of rolling element bearings using genetic algorithms , 2007 .

[6]  Joseph Edward Shigley,et al.  Mechanical engineering design , 1972 .

[7]  Rajiv Tiwari,et al.  Rolling element bearing design through genetic algorithms , 2003 .

[8]  Harish Hirani,et al.  Comprehensive design methodology for an engine journal bearing , 2000 .

[9]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling preferences in evolutionary multiobjective optimization: a survey , 2000, Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No.00TH8512).

[10]  A. Seireg,et al.  A Survey of Optimization of Mechanical Design , 1972 .

[11]  G. M. Wylie,et al.  The Optimum One-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Gas Rayleigh Step Bearing , 1970 .

[12]  Eckart Zitzler,et al.  Evolutionary algorithms for multiobjective optimization: methods and applications , 1999 .

[13]  A. Seireg,et al.  Optimum Design of Hydrodynamic Journal Bearings , 1969 .

[14]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimisation: NSGA-II , 2000, PPSN.