An Impartial Measure of Collective Action

Abstract: In three studies, we developed and validated the Belief-aligned Collective Action scale (BCA), a new measure of collective action that discriminates the so far confounded engagement in collective action from the ideological stance on the issue. In Studies 1a ( N = 585 Italian adult participants, 61% women) and 1b ( N = 296 British adult participants, 52% women), an Exploratory Factor Analysis identified two factors, Normative and Non-normative actions. In Study 2 ( N = 602 Italian adult participants, 50% women), a bifactor Confirmatory Factor Analysis showed an adequate fit of the two-factor structure. Across studies, the scale presents good internal reliability (as indicated by Cronbach’s α and ω total) and correlations in the predicted direction with common predictors of collective action, namely efficacy, anger, and group identity. Furthermore, Study 2 shows the generalizability of the scale to multiple topics, of which some are more relevant to left-wing people (e.g., wealth tax) and some to right-wing people (e.g., abortion). In these cases, we find no evidence for the effect of ideological variables such as political orientation and system justification. This tool allows researchers to assess collective action unbiasedly, contributing to the bridging of the ideological knowledge gap in the field of social psychology.

[1]  Martijn van Zomeren,et al.  Toward a comprehensive and potentially cross-cultural model of why people engage in collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of four motivations and structural constraints. , 2021, Psychological bulletin.

[2]  J. Adam‐Troian,et al.  The role of social identity in the explanation of collective action: An intergroup perspective on the Yellow Vests movement , 2021, Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

[3]  Emma F. Thomas,et al.  Testing the Social Identity Model of Collective Action Longitudinally and Across Structurally Disadvantaged and Advantaged Groups , 2020, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[4]  B. Choma,et al.  Right‐Wing Ideology as a Predictor of Collective Action: A Test Across Four Political Issue Domains , 2020, Political Psychology.

[5]  A. Shariff,et al.  The Support for Economic Inequality Scale: Development and adjudication , 2019, PloS one.

[6]  Linda R. Tropp,et al.  Are White Women Showing Up for Racial Justice?: Intergroup Contact, Closeness to People Targeted by Prejudice, and Collective Action , 2019, Psychology of Women Quarterly.

[7]  C. Sibley,et al.  System justification theory at 25: Evaluating a paradigm shift in psychology and looking towards the future , 2018, The British journal of social psychology.

[8]  Homero Gil de Zúñiga,et al.  System justification enhances well‐being: A longitudinal analysis of the palliative function of system justification in 18 countries , 2018, The British journal of social psychology.

[9]  N. Branscombe,et al.  The Role of Threat, Emotions, and Prejudice in Promoting Collective Action Against Immigrant Groups , 2018 .

[10]  M. Hooghe,et al.  Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor? Support for Social Citizenship Rights in the United States and Europe , 2018 .

[11]  Augusta Isabella Alberici,et al.  Pluralistic morality and collective action: The role of moral foundations , 2018 .

[12]  Arnold K. Ho,et al.  The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. , 2015, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Thomas J. Dunn,et al.  From alpha to omega: a practical solution to the pervasive problem of internal consistency estimation. , 2014, British journal of psychology.

[14]  Tamar Saguy,et al.  Believing in “making a difference” to collective efforts: Participative efficacy beliefs as a unique predictor of collective action , 2013 .

[15]  Yves Rosseel,et al.  lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling , 2012 .

[16]  Nicole Tausch,et al.  Emotional Consequences of Collective Action Participation , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  Russell Spears,et al.  ‘This will bring shame on our nation’: The role of anticipated group-based emotions on collective action , 2011, Journal of experimental social psychology.

[18]  Stephen C. Wright,et al.  Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Oliver Christ,et al.  Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Robyn K. Mallett,et al.  Seeing Through Their Eyes: When Majority Group Members Take Collective Action on Behalf of an Outgroup , 2008 .

[21]  T. Postmes,et al.  Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  B. Lickel,et al.  Why Individuals Protest the Perceived Transgressions of Their Country , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[23]  Russell Spears,et al.  Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  J. Jost,et al.  Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among african americans and european americans , 2000 .

[25]  P. Tetlock Political psychology or politicized psychology: Is the road to scientific hell paved with good moral intentions? , 1994 .

[26]  K. Mardia Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications , 1970 .