Analysis of computer alerts suggesting oral medication use during computerized order entry of i.v. medications.

PURPOSE Compliance with computer alerts suggesting oral medication use during computerized order entry of i.v. medications was analyzed. SUMMARY Using automated computerized clinical decision support (CDS) to suggest converting i.v. medications to oral alternatives can reduce medication costs for hospitalized patients, but prescriber noncompliance limits the effectiveness of such interventions. Clearer understanding of the factors associated with noncompliance to alerts may facilitate the design of more effective CDS systems. Electronic medical record data were retrospectively analyzed to measure the rate of compliance with a CDS alert that suggested converting to an equivalent oral form of a drug at the time of ordering the i.v. formulation. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the associations among medication type, clinician characteristics, hospital service type, time of order, and compliance with the i.v.-to-oral conversion recommendation. The main outcome was compliance with the alert, measured at the level of the individual medication order. The mean +/- S.E. overall compliance rate was 18.7% +/- 0.6%. Compliance varied among the medications, with methyl-prednisolone having the lowest (8%) and famotidine the highest (32%) (p < 0.05). Nurses had the highest compliance rate (35%) while pharmacists had the lowest (10%) (p < 0.05). Medical house staff (19%) and medical faculty (21%) complied at similar rates. The intensive care units had lower compliance rates than did the medical-surgical ward (15% versus 21%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION CDS alerts to convert 12 i.v. medications to oral alternatives were developed and implemented in an urban tertiary hospital. Compliance rates for the alerts were relatively low and varied by medication, location, and clinician type.

[1]  R. Raschke,et al.  A computer alert system to prevent injury from adverse drug events: development and evaluation in a community teaching hospital. , 1998, JAMA.

[2]  Lena Gunningberg,et al.  Evidence for elective replacement of peripheral intravenous catheter to prevent thrombophlebitis: a systematic review. , 2006, Journal of advanced nursing.

[3]  G. Rayan,et al.  Intravenous catheter complications in the hand and forearm. , 2004, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  S. T. Rosenbloom,et al.  Oral quinolones in hospitalized patients: an evaluation of a computerized decision support intervention * , 2004, Journal of internal medicine.

[5]  C. Woods,et al.  Risk factors for hematogenous complications of intravascular catheter-associated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  Mary Cooper,et al.  Impact of a computerized alert during physician order entry on medication dosing in patients with renal impairment , 2002, AMIA.

[7]  S. Davis,et al.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations associated with the use of intravenous-to-oral moxifloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia. , 2005, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[8]  David Sarne,et al.  Computerized physician order entry of medications and clinical decision support can improve problem list documentation compliance , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  D. Nicolau,et al.  Pharmacoeconomics of a pharmacist-managed program for automatically converting levofloxacin route from i.v. to oral. , 2002, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[10]  I Glemaud,et al.  Use of a physician order entry system to identify opportunities for intravenous to oral levofloxacin conversion. , 2000, American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

[11]  R. Sherertz,et al.  The risk of peripheral vein phlebitis associated with chlorhexidine-coated catheters: a randomized, double-blind trial. , 1997, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[12]  A. Jensen,et al.  Risk factors for hospital-acquired Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. , 1999, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  G. Raskob,et al.  Prevention of central venous catheter-associated thrombosis: a meta-analysis. , 2007, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  N. Daver,et al.  Oral step-down therapy is comparable to intravenous therapy for Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis. , 2007, The Journal of infection.

[15]  P. Nikolaides,et al.  Randomized Controlled Trial of Sequential Intravenous (i.v.) and Oral Moxifloxacin Compared with Sequential i.v. and Oral Co-Amoxiclav with or without Clarithromycin in Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Initial Parenteral Treatment , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[16]  S. Steinberg,et al.  A double-blind comparison of empirical oral and intravenous antibiotic therapy for low-risk febrile patients with neutropenia during cancer chemotherapy. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  J. Heit The Epidemiology of Venous Thromboembolism in the Community: Implications for Prevention and Management , 2006, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[18]  Dan M. Kluger,et al.  The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. , 2006, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[19]  A. Localio,et al.  Prolonged Intravenous Therapy Versus Early Transition to Oral Antimicrobial Therapy for Acute Osteomyelitis in Children , 2009, Pediatrics.

[20]  David G. Kleinbaum,et al.  Logistic Regression. A Self- Learning Text , 1994 .

[21]  William L. Galanter,et al.  Application of Information Technology: A Trial of Automated Decision Support Alerts for Contraindicated Medications Using Computerized Physician Order Entry , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  Audrius Polikaitis,et al.  Preventing exacerbation of an ADE with automated decision support. , 2002, Journal of healthcare information management : JHIM.

[23]  Marcus Ferrone,et al.  Risk of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection With Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters Used in Hospitalized Patients , 2006 .

[24]  L. Targownik,et al.  Intravenous Versus High-Dose Oral Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy After Endoscopic Hemostasis of High-Risk Lesions in Patients with Acute Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding , 2007, Digestive Diseases and Sciences.

[25]  Dan M. Kluger,et al.  A Review of Risk Factors for Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Caused by Percutaneously Inserted, Noncuffed Central Venous Catheters: Implications for Preventive Strategies , 2002, Medicine.

[26]  L. Eron Cellulitis and Soft-Tissue Infections , 2009, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[27]  Dose conversions: opportunity for error. , 2007, The American journal of medicine.

[28]  William L. Galanter,et al.  A trial of automated safety alerts for inpatient digoxin use with computerized physician order entry. , 2004, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[29]  William M. Tierney,et al.  Physicians’ reasons for failing to comply with computerized preventive care guidelines , 1996, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[30]  J. Teich,et al.  Conversion from intravenous to oral medications: assessment of a computerized intervention for hospitalized patients. , 2003, Archives of internal medicine.

[31]  Jonathan M. Teich,et al.  An information system to promote intravenous-to-oral medication conversion , 1999, AMIA.

[32]  K. A. Hunter,et al.  Pharmacist-managed intravenous to oral step-down program. , 1995, Clinical therapeutics.

[33]  H. Ohmatsu,et al.  Randomized trial of oral versus intravenous antibiotics in low-risk febrile neutropenic patients with lung cancer. , 2004, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.