Quantitative modeling of artist styles in Renaissance face portraiture

Renaissance portraits were depictions of some important royals of those times. Analysis of faces in these portraits can provide valuable dynastical information in addition to enriching personal details of the depicted sitter. Such studies can offer insights to the art-history community in understanding and linking personal histories. In particular, face recognition technologies can be useful for identifying subjects when there is ambiguity. However, portraits are subject to several complexities such as aesthetic sensibilities of the artist or social standing of the sitter. Thus, for robust automated face recognition, it becomes important to model the characteristics of the artist. In this paper, we focus on modeling the styles of artists by considering case studies involving Renaissance art-works. After a careful examination of artistic trends, we arrive at relevant features for analysis. From a set of instances known to match/not match, we learn distributions of match and non-match scores which we collectively refer to as the portrait feature space (PFS). Thereafter, using statistical permutation tests we learn which of the chosen features were emphasized in various works involving (a) same artist depicting same sitter, (b) same sitter but by different artists and (c) same artist but depicting different sitters. Finally, we show that the knowledge of these specific choices can provide valuable information regarding the sitter and/or artist.

[1]  L. Farkas,et al.  Inclinations of the Facial Profile: Art versus Reality , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[2]  LinLin Shen,et al.  A review on Gabor wavelets for face recognition , 2006, Pattern Analysis and Applications.

[3]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[5]  David G. Stork,et al.  In search of Leonardo: computer-based facial image analysis of Renaissance artworks for identifying Leonardo as subject , 2012, Electronic Imaging.

[6]  P. Good Permutation, Parametric, and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses (Springer Series in Statistics) , 1994 .

[7]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[8]  Alex Pentland,et al.  View-based and modular eigenspaces for face recognition , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[9]  Norbert Krüger,et al.  Face Recognition by Elastic Bunch Graph Matching , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  David G. Stork,et al.  Computer Vision and Computer Graphics Analysis of Paintings and Drawings: An Introduction to the Literature , 2009, CAIP.

[11]  Christopher R Forrest,et al.  Anthropometric Measurements of the Facial Framework in Adulthood: Age-Related Changes in Eight Age Categories in 600 Healthy White North Americans of European Ancestry From 16 to 90 Years of Age , 2004, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[12]  Lei Yao,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1 Rhythmic Brushstrokes Distinguish Van Gogh from His Contemporaries: Findings via Automated Brushstroke Extraction , 2022 .

[13]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[14]  Christopher R Forrest,et al.  International Anthropometric Study of Facial Morphology in Various Ethnic Groups/Races , 2005, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[15]  P. Good Permutation, Parametric, and Bootstrap Tests of Hypotheses , 2005 .

[16]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces , 1999, SIGGRAPH.

[17]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Face Processing: Advanced Modeling and Methods , 2006, J. Electronic Imaging.

[18]  J. Hage,et al.  Clinical anthropometry and canons of the face in historical perspective. , 2000, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  Arun Ross,et al.  An introduction to biometrics , 2008, ICPR 2008.