The Effect of Different Mixing Methods on the Flow Rate and Compressive Strength of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Calcium-Enriched Mixture

Introduction: Flow rate (FR) and compressive strength (CS) are important properties of endodontic biomaterials that may be affected by various mixing methods. The aim of this experimental study was to evaluate the effect of different mixing methods on these properties of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement. Materials and methods: Hand, amalgamator and ultrasonic techniques were used to mix both biomaterials. Then 0.5 mL of each mixture was placed on a glass slab to measure FR. The second glass slab (100 g) was placed on the samples and 180 sec after the initiation of mixing a 100-g force was applied on it for 10 min. After 10 min, the load was removed, and the minimum and maximum diameters of the sample disks were measured. To measure the CS, 6 sample of each group were placed in steel molds and were then stored in distilled water for 21 h and 21 days. Afterwards, the CS test was performed. Data were analyzed with multi-variant ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: There were significant differences in FR of MTA and CEM cement with different mixing techniques (P<0.05). In the MTA group, none of the mixing techniques exhibited a significant effect on CS (P>0.05); however, in CEM group the CS at 21-h and 21-day intervals was higher with the hand technique (P<0.05). Conclusion: Mixing methods affected the flowability of both biomaterials and compressive strength of CEM cement.

[1]  F. Basturk,et al.  The effect of various mixing and placement techniques on the compressive strength of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2013, Journal of endodontics.

[2]  M. Samiei,et al.  Effects of various mixing techniques on push-out bond strengths of white mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2012, Journal of endodontics.

[3]  Veera Lertchirakarn,et al.  Setting time and flowability of accelerated Portland cement mixed with polycarboxylate superplasticizer. , 2011, Journal of endodontics.

[4]  M. Nekoofar,et al.  The effect of blood contamination on the compressive strength and surface microstructure of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[5]  L. Roshangar,et al.  Effect of mineral trioxide aggregates and Portland cements on inflammatory cells. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[6]  M. Nekoofar,et al.  The effect of various mixing techniques on the surface microhardness of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2010, International endodontic journal.

[7]  C. Primus,et al.  Physical and chemical properties of new-generation endodontic materials. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[8]  Mahmoud Torabinejad,et al.  Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review--Part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. , 2010, Journal of endodontics.

[9]  J. Camilleri Evaluation of selected properties of mineral trioxide aggregate sealer cement. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[10]  M. Eghbal,et al.  Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate's composition with Portland cements and a new endodontic cement. , 2009, Journal of endodontics.

[11]  Mehrdad Lotfi,et al.  Comparison of microleakage with three different thicknesses of mineral trioxide aggregate as root-end filling material. , 2008, Journal of oral science.

[12]  S. Shahabi,et al.  The properties of a new endodontic material. , 2008, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  T. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The anti-microbial effect against enterococcus faecalis and the compressive strength of two types of mineral trioxide aggregate mixed with sterile water or 2% chlorhexidine liquid. , 2007, Journal of endodontics.

[14]  S. J. Hayes,et al.  The effect of condensation pressure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2007, International endodontic journal.

[15]  A. Yap,et al.  Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and portland cement. , 2006, Journal of endodontics.

[16]  H. Gerth,et al.  A comparative study of selected properties of ProRoot mineral trioxide aggregate and two Portland cements. , 2006, International endodontic journal.

[17]  N. Sarkar,et al.  Physicochemical basis of the biologic properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. , 2005, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  F. Fochtman,et al.  A comparative analysis of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Portland cement. , 2003, Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.

[19]  Qiang Zhu,et al.  Cell and tissue reactions to mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[20]  J. Nicholson,et al.  An evaluation of accelerated Portland cement as a restorative material. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[21]  M. Torabinejad,et al.  Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. , 1995, Journal of endodontics.