Adaptive glenoid bone remodeling simulation.

Glenoid prosthesis loosening is the most common cause for revision total shoulder arthroplasty. Stress-induced bone remodeling may compromise long-term prosthesis fixation and significantly contribute to loosening. Realistic, robust analysis of bone-prosthesis constructs need to look beyond initial post-implantation mechanics provided by static finite element (FE) simulation. Adaptive bone remodeling simulations based on Wolff's law are needed for evaluating long-term glenoid prostheses fixation. The purpose of this study was to take a first step towards this goal and create and validate two-dimensional FE simulations, using the intact glenoid, for computing subject-specific adaptive glenoid remodeling. Two-dimensional glenoid FE models were created from scapulae computed tomography images. Two distinct processes, "element" and "node" simulations, used the forward-Euler method to compute bone remodeling. Initial bone density was homogeneous. Center and offset load combinations were iteratively applied. To validate the simulations we performed location-specific statistical comparisons between predicted and actual bone density, load combinations, and "element" and "node" processes. Visually and quantitatively "element" simulations produced better results (p>0.22), and correlation coefficients ranged 0.51-0.69 (p<0.001). Having met this initial work's goals, we expect subject-specific FE glenoid bone remodeling simulations together with static FE stress analyses to be effective tools for designing and evaluating glenoid prostheses.

[1]  Il Yong Kim,et al.  Analogy of strain energy density based bone-remodeling algorithm and structural topology optimization. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[2]  D R Sumner,et al.  Adaptive bone remodeling around bonded noncemented total hip arthroplasty: A comparison between animal experiments and computer simulation , 1993, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  Mark Taylor,et al.  Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  M Viceconti,et al.  Material properties assignment to finite element models of bone structures: a new method. , 1999, Medical engineering & physics.

[5]  G Chen,et al.  Comparison of two numerical approaches for bone remodelling. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[6]  B F Morrey,et al.  Stress analyses of glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 1999, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[7]  P. Büchler,et al.  A finite element model of the shoulder: application to the comparison of normal and osteoarthritic joints. , 2002, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  A. Skirving Total shoulder arthroplasty — current problems and possible solutions , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[9]  R. B. Ashman,et al.  Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone. , 1995, Medical engineering & physics.

[10]  F van Keulen,et al.  The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  N. Poppen,et al.  Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. , 1978, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[12]  P S Walker,et al.  Analysis of glenoid fixation for a reversed anatomy fixed-fulcrum shoulder replacement. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  C A Rockwood,et al.  Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  F. V. D. van der Helm,et al.  Stress analysis of cemented glenoid prostheses in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  R. Cofield,et al.  Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results. , 1997, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[16]  J. Lynch,et al.  Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  P. Smolinski,et al.  Bone remodeling around total hip implants. , 1992, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[18]  Poppen Nk,et al.  Forces at the glenohumeral joint in abduction. , 1978 .

[19]  G. Beaupré,et al.  An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—application: A preliminary remodeling simulation , 1990, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[20]  P J Prendergast,et al.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of glenoid replacement prostheses: a comparison of keeled and pegged anchorage systems. , 2000, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[21]  G. Walch,et al.  Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study. , 2002, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[22]  J. C. Simo,et al.  Numerical instabilities in bone remodeling simulations: the advantages of a node-based finite element approach. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  Andrew R Hopkins,et al.  Finite element models of total shoulder replacement: Application of boundary conditions , 2005, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[24]  Martin Rb Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984 .

[25]  D R Carter,et al.  Stress analyses of glenoid component designs. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.