Putting a price on prisoner release: The history of bail and a possible future of parole

In this article, we argue that the history of bail foretells the future of parole. Under a plan called the Conditional Post-Conviction Release Bond Act (recently passed into law in three states), US prisoners can secure early release only after posting ‘post-conviction bail’. As with pre-trial bail, the fledgling model would require prisoners to pay a percentage of the bail amount to secure their release under the contractual responsibility of a commercial bail agency. If release conditions are breached, bounty hunters are legally empowered to seize and return the parolee to prison. Our inquiry outlines the origins of this post-conviction bond plan and the research upon which it is based. Drawing on the ‘new penology’ framework, we identify several underlying factors that make for a ripe advocacy environment and set the stage for widespread state-level adoption of this plan in the near future. Post-conviction bail fits squarely within the growing policy trends toward privatization, managerialism, and actuarial justice. Most importantly, though, advocates have the benefit of precedent on their side, as most US states have long relied on a system of commercial bail bonding and private bounty hunting to manage conditional pretrial release.

[1]  M. Feeley Court Reform on Trial: Why Simple Solutions Fail , 2013 .

[2]  Shadd Maruna Lessons for Justice Reinvestment from Restorative Justice and the Justice Model Experience: Some Tips for an 8-year-old Prodigy. , 2011 .

[3]  Shadd Maruna Reentry as a rite of passage , 2011 .

[4]  Sharon Dolovich,et al.  State Punishment and Private Prisons , 2005 .

[5]  J. Travis But They All Come Back: Facing the Challenges of Prisoner Reentry , 2005 .

[6]  J. Travis Prisoners Once Removed: The Impact of Incarceration and Reentry on Children, Families, and Communities , 2004 .

[7]  J. Simon Poor discipline : parole and the social control of the underclass, 1890-1990 , 1995 .

[8]  M. Reynolds Using the Private Sector to Deter Crime , 1994 .

[9]  Jonathan Simon,et al.  The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications , 1992 .

[10]  David Garland,et al.  Punishment and modern society : a study in social theory , 1991 .

[11]  F. Devine Commercial Bail Bonding: A Comparison of Common Law Alternatives , 1991 .

[12]  W. H. Thomas Bail Reform in America , 1977 .

[13]  L. Friedman The evolution of a bail reform , 1976 .

[14]  R. Pound,et al.  Criminal Justice in Cleveland , 1968 .

[15]  F. Suffet Bail Setting: A Study of Courtroom Interaction , 1966 .

[16]  Harry I. Subin,et al.  Ransom : a critique of the American bail system , 1966 .

[17]  N. Padfield Who to release? : parole, fairness and criminal justice , 2007 .

[18]  Judith A. Greene GETTING TOUGH ON CRIME: THE HISTORY AND POLITICAL CONTEXT OF SENTENCING REFORM DEVELOPMENTS LEADING TO THE PASSAGE OF THE 1994 CRIME ACT , 2002 .

[19]  W. T. Murphy,et al.  Punishment and Modern Society , 1990 .

[20]  G. Alexander,et al.  A Study of the Administration of Bail in New York City , 1958 .

[21]  W. Holdsworth,et al.  Antiquities of Bail: Origin and Historical Development in Criminal Cases to the Year 1275 , 1941 .

[22]  J. P. Hayes Contracts to Indemnify Bail in Criminal Cases , 1937 .

[23]  A. L. Beeley The bail system in Chicago , 1927 .

[24]  Jennifer L. Skeem,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article Journal of Offender Rehabilitation Back to the Future: from Klockars' Model of Effective Supervision to Evidence-based Practice in Probation , 2022 .