Evaluating the environmental effects of transportation modes using an integrated methodology and an application

The increasing needs for transportation of freight and passengers causes environmental impacts. Preventing studies for these impacts should be considered by logistics firms and encouraged by the regulations of authorities. An important contribution can be provided by determining the environmental effects of the transportation modes in specific regions and using the most convenient ones. In this study, multiple criteria decision-making techniques, including human judgments, tangible and intangible criteria and priorities are used. Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation, as two of the multi criteria decision-making methodologies, are integrated for ranking the transportation modes in terms of the environmental effects of them. The proposed decision-making process is applied to chose the environmentally convenient transportation mode with respect to the determined evaluation criteria in Marmara Region of Turkey. The results indicate that, the main problem for the Marmara Region about transportation aspects is to pass from the intensive utilization of the road transportation mode to another one. In this study it is seen that the most convenient transformation mode in Marmara Region is the sea transportation mode.

[1]  Umut Rifat Tuzkaya,et al.  A fuzzy analytic network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: A case study , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[2]  C. Jotin Khisty,et al.  A rational reasoning method from fuzzy perceptions in route choice , 2005, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[3]  ARMEN Zzkarian,et al.  Forming teams: an analytical approach , 1999 .

[4]  A. Kusiak,et al.  Forming teams : an analytical approach 87 , 1999 .

[5]  Mark A. Delucchi EMISSIONS OF CRITERIA POLLUTANTS, TOXIC AIR POLLUTANTS AND GREENHOUSE GASES FROM THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION MODES AND FUELS. , 1996 .

[6]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[7]  Jun Wu,et al.  Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2007 .

[8]  Roger Gorham,et al.  Sustainable urban transport: Four innovative directions , 2006 .

[9]  M. Ramachandran,et al.  Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning--A review , 2004 .

[10]  Thomas Spengler,et al.  Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[11]  De-Li Yang,et al.  Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[12]  Cathy Macharis,et al.  THE APPLICABILITY OF MULTICRITERIA-ANALYSIS TO THE EVALUATION OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT SYSTEMS (ITS). IN: ECONOMIC IMPACTS OF INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS: INNOVATIONS AND CASE STUDIES , 2004 .

[13]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey , 2004 .

[14]  Pmw Elsenaar,et al.  URBAN TRANSPORT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN THE NETHERLANDS , 1993 .

[15]  Kwai-Sang Chin,et al.  A linear goal programming priority method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its applications in new product screening , 2008, Int. J. Approx. Reason..

[16]  Marc J. Schniederjans,et al.  Linear Goal Programming , 1984 .

[17]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[18]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[19]  Wen-Chieh Chou,et al.  Application of fuzzy theory and PROMETHEE technique to evaluate suitable ecotechnology method: A case study in Shihmen Reservoir Watershed, Taiwan , 2007 .

[20]  Johan Springael,et al.  PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Pin-Yu Chu,et al.  A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection☆ , 2008 .

[22]  Yu Jing,et al.  A discussion on Extent Analysis Method and applications of fuzzy AHP , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[24]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[25]  H. Zimmermann Fuzzy sets, decision making, and expert systems , 1987 .

[26]  Nang-Fei Pan,et al.  FUZZY AHP APPROACH FOR SELECTING THE SUITABLE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION METHOD , 2008 .

[27]  Huapu Lu,et al.  Urban transport and sustainable transport strategies: A case study of Karachi, Pakistan , 2007 .

[28]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[29]  F. Dweiri Fuzzy development of crisp activity relationship charts for facilities layout , 1999 .

[30]  Irem Ozkarahan,et al.  An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[31]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  Scenario building as a tool for planning a sustainable transportation system , 2003 .

[32]  Kenan-Flagler Multimodal Transportation , Logistics , and the Environment : Managing Interactions in a Global Economy , 2000 .