Feature tracking for automated volume of interest stabilization on 4D-OCT images

A common representation of volumetric medical image data is the triplanar view (TV), in which the surgeon manually selects slices showing the anatomical structure of interest. In addition to common medical imaging such as MRI or computed tomography, recent advances in the field of optical coherence tomography (OCT) have enabled live processing and volumetric rendering of four-dimensional images of the human body. Due to the region of interest undergoing motion, it is challenging for the surgeon to simultaneously keep track of an object by continuously adjusting the TV to desired slices. To select these slices in subsequent frames automatically, it is necessary to track movements of the volume of interest (VOI). This has not been addressed with respect to 4DOCT images yet. Therefore, this paper evaluates motion tracking by applying state-of-the-art tracking schemes on maximum intensity projections (MIP) of 4D-OCT images. Estimated VOI location is used to conveniently show corresponding slices and to improve the MIPs by calculating thin-slab MIPs. Tracking performances are evaluated on an in-vivo sequence of human skin, captured at 26 volumes per second. Among investigated tracking schemes, our recently presented tracking scheme for soft tissue motion provides highest accuracy with an error of under 2.2 voxels for the first 80 volumes. Object tracking on 4D-OCT images enables its use for sub-epithelial tracking of microvessels for image-guidance.

[1]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Towards Intra-operative OCT Guidance for Automatic Head Surgery: First Experimental Results , 2013, MICCAI.

[2]  Milan Sonka,et al.  Registration of 3D spectral OCT volumes using 3D SIFT feature point matching , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[3]  Wolfgang Wieser,et al.  High definition live 3D-OCT in vivo: design and evaluation of a 4D OCT engine with 1 GVoxel/s. , 2014, Biomedical optics express.

[4]  Matthijs C. Dorst.  Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints , 2011 .

[5]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  BRISK: Binary Robust invariant scalable keypoints , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[6]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR Angiography with Gradient Motion Refocusing , 1988, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  Nicolas Andreff,et al.  Wavelets-based 6 DOF visual servoing , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[8]  Gary R. Bradski,et al.  ORB: An efficient alternative to SIFT or SURF , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[9]  Vincent Lepetit,et al.  BRIEF: Binary Robust Independent Elementary Features , 2010, ECCV.

[10]  Tom Drummond,et al.  Machine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection , 2006, ECCV.

[11]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Methods for a fusion of optical coherence tomography and stereo camera image data , 2015, Medical Imaging.

[12]  Pierre Vandergheynst,et al.  FREAK: Fast Retina Keypoint , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  G D Rubin,et al.  STS-MIP: a new reconstruction technique for CT of the chest. , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[14]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Forward-Backward Error: Automatic Detection of Tracking Failures , 2010, 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition.

[15]  J. Schuman,et al.  Optical coherence tomography. , 2000, Science.

[16]  Eva Lankenau,et al.  Combining Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) with an Operating Microscope , 2007 .

[17]  Tobias Ortmaier,et al.  Soft tissue motion tracking with application to tablet-based incision planning in laser surgery , 2016, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[18]  Luc Van Gool,et al.  Speeded-Up Robust Features (SURF) , 2008, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..