Discordant Theories of Strategic Management and Emergent Practice in Knowledge-Intensive Organizations

This paper argues that there is a significant gap between theories of traditional scientific management and theories attending to practice and self-organisation as they apply to knowledge-intensive organisations. Knowledge work and innovative endeavours in organizational settings are often approached from contrasting perspectives: strategic, top-down direction on one hand and emergent, practice-based on the other. This paper describes the discord that can result from these disparate approaches. In outlining the polarities evident in current theories and perspectives of strategic management and emergent practice and in establishing a troubled space between them, the paper suggests that opportunities exist for more effective facilitation of knowledge activities in organizations by attending to the gap.

[1]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum , 1999 .

[2]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[3]  H. Tsoukas.  Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology , 2004 .

[4]  Charles Ehin,et al.  Un‐managing knowledge workers , 2008 .

[5]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Of strategies, deliberate and emergent , 1985, Strategic Management Journal.

[6]  Daniel Geiger.  Revisiting the Concept of Practice: Toward an Argumentative Understanding of Practicing , 2009 .

[7]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[8]  Olga Rivera,et al.  Communities of practice: a model for their cultivation , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[10]  S. Gherardi.  Introduction: The Critical Power of the `Practice Lens' , 2009 .

[11]  Sandra Moffett,et al.  Contributing and enabling technologies for knowledge management , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag..

[12]  Silvia Gherardi,et al.  Knowing and learning in practice‐based studies: an introduction , 2009 .

[13]  R. Stacey.  Strategic Management and Organisational Dynamics: The Challenge of Complexity , 1999 .

[14]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  The mind or the heart? it depends on the (definition of) situation , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[15]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[16]  G. Hamel.  The Future of Management , 2007 .

[17]  David C. Wilson,et al.  Inertia in Japanese Organizations: Knowledge Management Routines and Failure to Innovate , 2006 .

[18]  P. Shaw.  Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change , 2002 .

[19]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[20]  A. Bruni,et al.  Knowing in a System of Fragmented Knowledge , 2007 .

[21]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[22]  R. McDermott.  Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[23]  T. Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Institutional Work , 2006 .

[24]  Hanne Nørreklit.  The Balance on the Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis of Some of Its Assumptions , 2000 .

[25]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Organizational Knowledge: The Texture of Workplace Learning , 2006 .