A novel point‐of‐care information system reduces anaesthesiologists' errors while managing case scenarios

Background and objectives: The On‐Line Electronic Help (OLEH) is a point‐of‐care information system for anaesthesia providers prepared by the European Society of Anaesthesiologists. In this preliminary study the effect of the OLEH availability on the incidence of knowledge‐based errors during the management of case scenarios and participants' subjective evaluation of the OLEH were evaluated. Methods: After a short training session, 48 anaesthesiologists (24 junior residents, 12 senior residents and 12 board‐certified) were presented randomly with six computer screen‐based case scenarios with, and six without, the option of using the OLEH. Two reviewers evaluated the answers independently according to preconfigured guidelines. Results: The availability of the OLEH was associated with higher scores in 11 of the 12 scenarios, and with a decrease in the incidence of critical errors in 10 scenarios. Time to task completion was increased in one scenario only when the OLEH was used. The degree of professional experience was associated with better scores in five of the scenarios and with a reduced occurrence of critical errors in three scenarios. Forty‐two out of 48 participants stated that finding information in the OLEH software was easy and that the system was helpful in managing the scenarios. Conclusions: This preliminary study demonstrates the potential value of the OLEH in decreasing the number of knowledge‐based errors made by anaesthesiologists. According to the encouraging results, the OLEH system is currently under evaluation using full‐scale simulation scenarios in an operating room environment.

[1]  D. Covell,et al.  Information needs in office practice: are they being met? , 1985, Annals of internal medicine.

[2]  M. Chambliss,et al.  Answering clinical questions. , 1996, The Journal of family practice.

[3]  A Smith,et al.  Expertise in practice: an ethnographic study exploring acquisition and use of knowledge in anaesthesia. , 2003, British journal of anaesthesia.

[4]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Information needs of physicians , 1995 .

[5]  D. Gaba,et al.  The Response of Anesthesia Trainees to Simulated Critical Incidents , 1988, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[6]  D M D'Alessandro,et al.  Barriers to rural physician use of a digital health sciences library. , 1998, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[7]  F. Khan,et al.  A prospective survey of intra‐operative critical incidents in a teaching hospital in a developing country , 2001, Anaesthesia.

[8]  Julie J. McGowan,et al.  Electronic information access in support of clinical decision making: a comparative study of the impact on rural health care outcomes , 2000, AMIA.

[9]  M M Kurrek,et al.  Cardiac arrest in the OR: How are our ACLS skills? , 1998, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[10]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[11]  A. Barrie,et al.  Questioning behaviour in general practice: a pragmatic study , 1997, BMJ.

[12]  H A Schwid,et al.  Anesthesiologists' management of simulated critical incidents. , 1992, Anesthesiology.

[13]  F C Forrest,et al.  Use of a high-fidelity simulator to develop testing of the technical performance of novice anaesthetists. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[14]  How does human error affect safety in anesthesia? , 2000, Surgical oncology clinics of North America.

[15]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[16]  Comparison of performance 2 years after the old and new (interactive) ATLS courses. , 2001, The Journal of surgical research.

[17]  M. Ebell,et al.  Obstacles to answering doctors' questions about patient care with evidence: qualitative study , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  R. Haynes,et al.  Effects of Computer-based Clinical Decision Support Systems on Clinician Performance and Patient Outcome: A Critical Appraisal of Research , 1994, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  D M Gaba,et al.  Role of Experience in the Response to Simulated Critical Incidents , 1991, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[20]  Alan Morris Developing and Implementing Computerized Protocols for Standardization of Clinical Decisions , 2000, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  Cardiac arrest in the OR: How are our ACLS skills? , 1998 .

[22]  M. Ebell,et al.  Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care , 1999, BMJ.

[23]  A. Perel,et al.  Anaesthesiologists' views on the need for point-of-care information system in the operating room: a survey of the European Society of Anaesthesiologists , 2004, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[24]  D. Gaba,et al.  Unplanned Incidents During Comprehensive Anesthesia Simulation , 1989, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[25]  C. Pope,et al.  Making monitoring ‘work’: human–machine interaction and patient safety in anaesthesia , 2003, Anaesthesia.

[26]  N. Mann,et al.  A randomized controlled trial to assess decay in acquired knowledge among paramedics completing a pediatric resuscitation course. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[27]  J. Ely,et al.  The information needs of family physicians: case-specific clinical questions. , 1992, The Journal of family practice.