Evaluation of lubrication force on colliding particles for DEM simulation of fluidized beds

Abstract “Lubrication force” arises from hydrodynamic pressure in the interstitial fluid being squeezed out from the space between two solid surfaces. In the previous DEM simulations of gas–solid flows this force has not been explicitly taken into account since it may introduce the famous “Stokes Paradox”, which postulates that: Two solid surfaces can never make contact in a finite time in a viscous fluid due to the infinite “lubrication force” when the distance approaches zero at the last moment of contact. It is easy to imagine that lubrication effect is critical in liquid–solid systems, but it may not be negligible even in gas–solid systems of light and small particles. Although the lubrication theory has been well established in liquid–solid systems, its application in gas–solid systems should be used with caution because the assumptions adopted in the classical lubrication theory are only valid for highly viscous systems. In the present study, these assumptions are examined and semi-theoretical expressions for lubrication force are proposed based on numerical analysis. The paradox of contactless collision due to infinite lubrication force is effectively avoided by considering surface roughness, non-continuum fluid effect and van der Waals force. The coefficient of restitution is defined as a criterion for evaluating the significance of lubrication effect in collisions of particles in fluidized beds. For demonstration the lubrication effect was evaluated for beds of FCC particles and GB (glass beads), with diameters ranging from 25 to 100 μm and initial approaching velocity from u mf to u t . The calculated restitution coefficient ranged from 0 to nearly 1 and clearly showed that lubrication force plays a significant role during a close encounter of two particles even in gas–solid systems.

[1]  B. Briscoe,et al.  The formation and geometry of entrapped liquid lenses at elastomer-glass interfaces , 1977 .

[2]  J. Israelachvili Intermolecular and surface forces , 1985 .

[3]  L. M. Hocking The effect of slip on the motion of a sphere close to a wall and of two adjacent spheres , 1973 .

[4]  Y. Tsuji,et al.  Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed , 1993 .

[5]  G. Lian,et al.  On the squeeze flow of a power-law fluid between rigid spheres , 2001 .

[6]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  The effect of Maxwell slip on the aerodynamic collision and rebound of spherical particles , 1988 .

[7]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  DEM simulation of fluidized beds for gas-phase olefin polymerization , 1999 .

[8]  H. Brenner The slow motion of a sphere through a viscous fluid towards a plane surface , 1961 .

[9]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Numerical simulation of cohesive powder behavior in a fluidized bed , 1998 .

[10]  R. Gohar,et al.  Pressure Distribution Under a Ball Impacting a Thin Lubricant Layer , 1986 .

[11]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  The influence of surface interactions on the elastohydrodynamic collision of two spheres , 1986 .

[12]  P. Cundall,et al.  A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies , 1979 .

[13]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Behavior of particles and bubbles around immersed tubes in a fluidized bed at high temperature and pressure : a DEM simulation , 2001 .

[14]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Numerical simulation of metallic solid bridging particles in a fluidized bed at high temperature , 2000 .

[15]  E. J. Hinch,et al.  The elastohydrodynamic collision of two spheres , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[16]  M. Horio,et al.  The effect of tangential lubrication by bridge liquid on the behavior of agglomerating fluidized beds , 2000 .

[17]  Masayuki Horio,et al.  Particle and bubble movements around tubes immersed in fluidized beds : a numerical study , 1999 .

[18]  G. Lian,et al.  Elastohydrodynamic collisions of solid spheres , 1996, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.