Processes Underlying the Cross-Race Effect: An Investigation of Holistic, Featural, and Relational Processing of Own-Race versus Other-Race Faces

Adults are often better at recognising own-race than other-race faces. Unlike previous studies that reported an own-race advantage after administering a single test of either holistic processing or of featural and relational processing, we used a cross-over design and multiple tasks to assess differential processing of faces from a familiar race versus a less familiar race. Caucasian and Chinese adults performed four tasks, each with Caucasian and Chinese faces. Two tasks measured holistic processing: the composite face task and the part/whole task. Both tasks indicated holistic processing of own-race and other-race faces that did not differ in degree. Two tasks measured featural and relational processing: the Jane/Ling task, in which same/different judgments were made about face pairs that differed in features of their spacing, and the scrambled/blurred task, in which test faces were scrambled (isolates memory for components) or blurred (isolates memory for relations). Both tasks provided evidence of an own-race advantage in both featural and relational processing. We conclude that even when adults process other-race faces holistically, other manifestations of an own-race advantage remain.

[1]  R. Malpass,et al.  Recognition for faces of own and other race. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  J. F. Cross,et al.  Sex, race, age, and beauty as factors in recognition of faces , 1971 .

[3]  H. Ellis,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of Recognition Memory For Faces , 1974 .

[4]  H. P. Bahrick,et al.  Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. , 1975 .

[5]  S. Feinman,et al.  Children's ability to recognize other children's faces. , 1976, Child development.

[6]  J. Brigham,et al.  Accuracy of Eyewitness Identifications in a Field Setting , 1982 .

[7]  J. Brigham,et al.  Accuracy of eyewitness identification in a field setting. , 1982 .

[8]  L. Whitaker Anthropometry of the Head and Face in Medicine. , 1983 .

[9]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[10]  T. Valentine The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology a Unified Account of the Effects of Distinctiveness, Inversion, and Race in Face Recognition , 2022 .

[11]  S. Carey Becoming a face expert. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[12]  T. Valentine,et al.  Towards an Exemplar Model of Face Processing: The Effects of Race and Distinctiveness , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  김정우 특집 : 구약에 나타난 주의 영에 대한 교차방법론적 접근 ( A Cross - Sectional Approach ) , 1994 .

[15]  G. Hole Configurational Factors in the Perception of Unfamiliar Faces , 1994, Perception.

[16]  T. Valentine,et al.  An Investigation of the Contact Hypothesis of the Own-race Bias in Face Recognition , 1995 .

[17]  D. Levin CLASSIFYING FACES BY RACE : THE STRUCTURE OF FACE CATEGORIES , 1996 .

[18]  T. Allison,et al.  Face-Specific Processing in the Human Fusiform Gyrus , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  M. Peters,et al.  Description and validation of a flexible and broadly usable handedness questionnaire. , 1998, Laterality.

[20]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[21]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[23]  D. Levin Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  Christian A. Meissner,et al.  Social and Cognitive Factors Affecting the Own-Race Bias in Whites , 2000 .

[25]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[26]  C. Tredoux,et al.  A field study of own-race bias in South Africa and England. , 2001 .

[27]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[28]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. , 2001 .

[29]  David K. A. Barnes,et al.  correction: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[30]  D. Maurer,et al.  Neuroperception: Early visual experience and face processing , 2001, Nature.

[31]  Joan Y. Chiao,et al.  Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  M. Tarr,et al.  Unraveling mechanisms for expert object recognition: bridging brain activity and behavior. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[34]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[35]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face recognition algorithms and the other-race effect: computational mechanisms for a developmental contact hypothesis , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  Jing Luo,et al.  The Lasting Impression of Chairman Mao: Hyperfidelity of Familiar-Face Memory , 2003, Perception.

[37]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Holistic Processing of Faces in Preschool Children and Adults , 2003, Psychological science.

[38]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Perceiving an Object and Its Context in Different Cultures , 2003, Psychological science.

[39]  Robert L. Goldstone Do we all look alike to computers? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  J. Faubert,et al.  Configural face encoding and spatial frequency information , 2003, Perception & psychophysics.

[41]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2004 .

[42]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[43]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[44]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.

[45]  C. Pallier,et al.  Reversibility of the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition During Childhood , 2005, Psychological science.

[46]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[47]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2006 .

[48]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Faces are "spatial"--holistic face perception is supported by low spatial frequencies. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  Y. Bar-Haim,et al.  Nature and Nurture in Own-Race Face Processing , 2006, Psychological science.

[51]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Familiar Other-Race Faces Show Normal Holistic Processing and are Robust to Perceptual Stress , 2007, Perception.

[52]  B. Rossion,et al.  Holistic face processing is mature at 4 years of age: evidence from the composite face effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[53]  D. Maurer,et al.  The composite face effect in six-year-old children: Evidence of adult-like holistic face processing , 2007 .

[54]  Michael J. Bernstein,et al.  The Cross-Category Effect , 2007, Psychological science.

[55]  Kurt Hugenberg,et al.  Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit : Toward a solution to an insidious problem , 2007 .

[56]  G. Rhodes,et al.  An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition , 2008, Cognition.

[57]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. , 2008, British journal of psychology.

[58]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Revisiting the role of spatial frequencies in the holistic processing of faces. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[59]  K. Hugenberg,et al.  Class, Race, and the Face: Social Context Modulates the Cross-Race Effect in Face Recognition , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[60]  Jie Tian,et al.  Two faces of the other-race effect: recognition and categorisation of Caucasian and Chinese faces. , 2010, Perception.

[61]  Lara J Pierce,et al.  The neural plasticity of other-race face recognition , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[62]  Daphne Maurer,et al.  Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. , 2009, British journal of psychology.

[63]  Alice J. O'Toole,et al.  Face recognition algorithms and the “other-race” effect , 2010 .

[64]  Daphne Maurer,et al.  Discrimination of Facial Features by Adults, 10-Year-Olds, and Cataract-Reversal Patients , 2010, Perception.

[65]  B. Rossion,et al.  Holistic face encoding is modulated by perceived face race: Evidence from perceptual adaptation , 2010 .