Composition, structure, and function of heart teams: a joint position paper of the ACVC, EAPCI, EACTS, and EACTA focused on the management of patients with complex coronary artery disease requiring myocardial revascularization.

Contemporary cardiovascular medicine is complex, dynamic, and interactive. Therefore, multidisciplinary dialogue between different specialists is required to deliver optimal and patient-centred care. This has led to the concept of explicit collaborations of different specialists caring for patients with complex cardiovascular diseases-that is 'heart teams'. These teams are particularly valuable to minimize referral bias and improve guideline adherence as so to be responsive to patient preferences, needs, and values but may be challenging to coordinate, especially in the acute setting. This position paper-jointly developed by four cardiovascular associations-is intended to provide conceptual and practical considerations for the composition, structure, and function of multidisciplinary teams. It focuses on patients with complex coronary artery diseases in both elective and urgent setting and provide guidance on how to implement the heart team both in chronic and in acute coronary syndromes patients, including cases with mechanical complications and haemodynamic instability; it also discusses strategies for clear and transparent patient communication and provision of a patient-centric approach. Finally, gaps in evidence and research perspectives in this context are discussed.

[1]  C. O'connor,et al.  Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  Deepak L. Bhatt,et al.  Practical considerations for cangrelor use in patients with acute coronary syndromes , 2019, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.

[3]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  Shared decision making in oncology: A model based on patients', health care professionals', and researchers' views , 2018, Psycho-oncology.

[4]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[5]  C. Berry,et al.  Prognostic Value of the Residual SYNTAX Score After Functionally Complete Revascularization in ACS. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  G. Angelini,et al.  Radial‐Artery or Saphenous‐Vein Grafts in Coronary‐Artery Bypass Surgery , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  Marco Valgimigli,et al.  [2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.] , 2018, Kardiologia polska.

[8]  S. de Servi,et al.  APpropriAteness of percutaneous Coronary interventions in patients with ischaemic HEart disease in Italy: the APACHE pilot study , 2017, BMJ Open.

[9]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study , 2017, European heart journal.

[10]  P. Serruys,et al.  Comparison of Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  B. Gersh,et al.  Revascularization in Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Is the Assessment of Viability Still Viable? , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  Ethan Y. Brovman,et al.  Rate of Major Anesthetic-Related Outcomes in the Intraoperative and Immediate Postoperative Period After Cardiac Surgery. , 2016, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[13]  R. de Caterina,et al.  Complete myocardial revascularization confers a larger clinical benefit when performed with state‐of‐the‐art techniques in high‐risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis of randomized and observational studies , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting Without Persistent ST-segment Elevation. , 2015, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[15]  N. Hackett,et al.  ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery. , 2015, International journal of surgery.

[16]  Si‐Hyuck Kang,et al.  The impact of residual coronary lesions on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Residual SYNTAX score after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients from the Efficacy of Xience/Promus versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss after stENTing (EXCELLENT) registry. , 2014, American heart journal.

[17]  The heart team approach to coronary revascularization--have we crossed the lines of evidence-based medicine? , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[18]  S. Garcia,et al.  Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  J. Gunn,et al.  Residual SYNTAX score after PCI for triple vessel coronary artery disease: quantifying the adverse effect of incomplete revascularisation. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[20]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II , 2013, The Lancet.

[21]  J. Zamorano,et al.  Emergency echocardiography: the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations. , 2013, European Heart Journal-Cardiovascular Imaging.

[22]  Nikola Jagic,et al.  Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  P. Serruys,et al.  Quantification and impact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  G. Stone,et al.  SYNTAX Score Reproducibility and Variability Between Interventional Cardiologists, Core Laboratory Technicians, and Quantitative Coronary Measurements , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[25]  Volkmar Falk,et al.  Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (esc) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (eacts) Developed with the Special Contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular I , 2022 .

[26]  E. Boersma,et al.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Functionally Nonsignificant Stenosis , 2007 .