Composition, structure, and function of heart teams: a joint position paper of the ACVC, EAPCI, EACTS, and EACTA focused on the management of patients with complex coronary artery disease requiring myocardial revascularization.
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. Vrints | H. Bueno | M. Valgimigli | D. Capodanno | S. Leonardi | M. Lettino | A. Jeppsson | S. Price | S. Rex | F. Guarracino | M. Sousa-Uva | M. Sousa‐Uva
[1] C. O'connor,et al. Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[2] Deepak L. Bhatt,et al. Practical considerations for cangrelor use in patients with acute coronary syndromes , 2019, European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care.
[3] A. Stiggelbout,et al. Shared decision making in oncology: A model based on patients', health care professionals', and researchers' views , 2018, Psycho-oncology.
[4] Volkmar Falk,et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. , 2018, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.
[5] C. Berry,et al. Prognostic Value of the Residual SYNTAX Score After Functionally Complete Revascularization in ACS. , 2018, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] G. Angelini,et al. Radial‐Artery or Saphenous‐Vein Grafts in Coronary‐Artery Bypass Surgery , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.
[7] Marco Valgimigli,et al. [2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation.] , 2018, Kardiologia polska.
[8] S. de Servi,et al. APpropriAteness of percutaneous Coronary interventions in patients with ischaemic HEart disease in Italy: the APACHE pilot study , 2017, BMJ Open.
[9] P. Serruys,et al. Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three vessel disease: 1-year results of the SYNTAX II study , 2017, European heart journal.
[10] P. Serruys,et al. Comparison of Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome. , 2017, The American journal of cardiology.
[11] B. Gersh,et al. Revascularization in Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Is the Assessment of Viability Still Viable? , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[12] Ethan Y. Brovman,et al. Rate of Major Anesthetic-Related Outcomes in the Intraoperative and Immediate Postoperative Period After Cardiac Surgery. , 2016, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.
[13] R. de Caterina,et al. Complete myocardial revascularization confers a larger clinical benefit when performed with state‐of‐the‐art techniques in high‐risk patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: A meta‐analysis of randomized and observational studies , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[14] Jeroen J. Bax,et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting Without Persistent ST-segment Elevation. , 2015, Revista espanola de cardiologia.
[15] N. Hackett,et al. ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery. , 2015, International journal of surgery.
[16] Si‐Hyuck Kang,et al. The impact of residual coronary lesions on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Residual SYNTAX score after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients from the Efficacy of Xience/Promus versus Cypher in rEducing Late Loss after stENTing (EXCELLENT) registry. , 2014, American heart journal.
[17] The heart team approach to coronary revascularization--have we crossed the lines of evidence-based medicine? , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.
[18] S. Garcia,et al. Outcomes after complete versus incomplete revascularization of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of 89,883 patients enrolled in randomized clinical trials and observational studies. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[19] J. Gunn,et al. Residual SYNTAX score after PCI for triple vessel coronary artery disease: quantifying the adverse effect of incomplete revascularisation. , 2013, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[20] Antonio Colombo,et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II , 2013, The Lancet.
[21] J. Zamorano,et al. Emergency echocardiography: the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging recommendations. , 2013, European Heart Journal-Cardiovascular Imaging.
[22] Nikola Jagic,et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[23] P. Serruys,et al. Quantification and impact of untreated coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: the residual SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[24] G. Stone,et al. SYNTAX Score Reproducibility and Variability Between Interventional Cardiologists, Core Laboratory Technicians, and Quantitative Coronary Measurements , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[25] Volkmar Falk,et al. Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (esc) and the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (eacts) Developed with the Special Contribution of the European Association for Percutaneous Cardiovascular I , 2022 .
[26] E. Boersma,et al. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Functionally Nonsignificant Stenosis , 2007 .