A decision-making Fokker–Planck model in computational neuroscience

In computational neuroscience, decision-making may be explained analyzing models based on the evolution of the average firing rates of two interacting neuron populations, e.g., in bistable visual perception problems. These models typically lead to a multi-stable scenario for the concerned dynamical systems. Nevertheless, noise is an important feature of the model taking into account both the finite-size effects and the decision’s robustness. These stochastic dynamical systems can be analyzed by studying carefully their associated Fokker–Planck partial differential equation. In particular, in the Fokker–Planck setting, we analytically discuss the asymptotic behavior for large times towards a unique probability distribution, and we propose a numerical scheme capturing this convergence. These simulations are used to validate deterministic moment methods recently applied to the stochastic differential system. Further, proving the existence, positivity and uniqueness of the probability density solution for the stationary equation, as well as for the time evolving problem, we show that this stabilization does happen. Finally, we discuss the convergence of the solution for large times to the stationary state. Our approach leads to a more detailed analytical and numerical study of decision-making models applied in computational neuroscience.

[1]  P. Holmes,et al.  MODELING A SIMPLE CHOICE TASK: STOCHASTIC DYNAMICS OF MUTUALLY INHIBITORY NEURAL GROUPS , 2001 .

[2]  N. Berglund,et al.  Noise-Induced Phenomena in Slow-Fast Dynamical Systems: A Sample-Paths Approach , 2005 .

[3]  J. Rinzel,et al.  Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Walter Senn,et al.  Minimal Models of Adapted Neuronal Response to In VivoLike Input Currents , 2004, Neural Computation.

[5]  B. Perthame,et al.  General relative entropy inequality: an illustration on growth models , 2005 .

[6]  Jianfeng Feng,et al.  Computational neuroscience , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[7]  Rafal Bogacz,et al.  A comparison of bounded diffusion models for choice in time controlled tasks. , 2009, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[8]  H. Amann Fixed Point Equations and Nonlinear Eigenvalue Problems in Ordered Banach Spaces , 1976 .

[9]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Weber's Law in Decision Making: Integrating Behavioral Data in Humans with a Neurophysiological Model , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  Giuseppe Toscani,et al.  ON CONVEX SOBOLEV INEQUALITIES AND THE RATE OF CONVERGENCE TO EQUILIBRIUM FOR FOKKER-PLANCK TYPE EQUATIONS , 2001 .

[11]  B. Perthame,et al.  General entropy equations for structured population models and scattering , 2004 .

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[13]  Qiangchang Ju,et al.  Large-time behavior of non-symmetric Fokker-Planck type equations , 2008 .

[14]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[16]  F. Attneave Multistability in perception. , 1971, Scientific American.

[17]  S. Swain Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Physics, Chemistry and the Natural Sciences , 1984 .

[18]  H. Tuckwell,et al.  Statistical properties of stochastic nonlinear dynamical models of single spiking neurons and neural networks. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[19]  Ranulfo Romo,et al.  Basic mechanisms for graded persistent activity: discrete attractors, continuous attractors, and dynamic representations , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[20]  Anton Arnold,et al.  Refined long-time asymptotics for some polymeric fluid flow models , 2010 .

[21]  G. M.,et al.  Partial Differential Equations I , 2023, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[22]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[23]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[24]  C. W. Gardiner,et al.  Handbook of stochastic methods - for physics, chemistry and the natural sciences, Second Edition , 1986, Springer series in synergetics.

[25]  W. D. Evans,et al.  PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS , 1941 .

[26]  Colin Renfrew,et al.  Carbon 14 and the Prehistory of Europe , 1971 .

[27]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Deterministic analysis of stochastic bifurcations in multi-stable neurodynamical systems , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[28]  J. Wloka,et al.  Partial differential equations: Strongly elliptic differential operators and the method of variations , 1987 .