The offshore trend: Structural changes in the wind power sector

In recent years, the wind power sector has begun to move offshore, i.e. to use space and good wind speeds on the open sea for large scale electricity generation. Offshore wind power, however, is not just technologically challenging but also a capital intensive and risky business that requires particular financial and organizational resources not all potential investors might have. We therefore address the question, what impact offshore wind power may have on ownership and organizational structures in the wind power sector. We compare on- and offshore wind park ownership in Denmark, the UK and Germany. The analysis shows that offshore wind power in all three countries is dominated by large firms, many of which are from the electricity sector. In Denmark and the UK, also investors from the gas and oil industry play an important role in the offshore wind business. This development represents a major shift for countries such as Germany and Denmark, in which the wind power sector has grown and matured on the basis of investments by individuals, farmers, cooperatives and independent project developers. The structural changes by which offshore wind power is accompanied have consequences for turbine manufacturers, project developers, investors, associations and policy makers in the field.

[1]  Keith Hays European wind: Offering growth amidst diverse market conditions , 2005 .

[2]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[3]  Till Stenzel,et al.  Regulating technological change—The strategic reactions of utility companies towards subsidy policies in the German, Spanish and UK electricity markets , 2008 .

[4]  M. Wolsink,et al.  Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. , 2007 .

[5]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Actor-oriented analysis of innovation systems: exploring micro–meso level linkages in the case of stationary fuel cells , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  Constantine Hadjilambrinos,et al.  Understanding technology choice in electricity industries: a comparative study of France and Denmark , 2000 .

[7]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Innovation processes in large technical systems: Market liberalization as a driver for radical change? , 2006 .

[8]  Catherine Mitchell,et al.  Renewable energy policy in the UK 1990-2003 , 2004 .

[9]  Jesper Munksgaard,et al.  Wind power in the Danish liberalised power market—Policy measures, price impact and investor incentives , 2008 .

[10]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Technological learning in offshore wind energy: Different roles of the government , 2007 .

[11]  Joanna I. Lewis,et al.  Fostering a renewable energy technology industry: An international comparison of wind industry policy support mechanisms , 2007 .

[12]  J. Buen,et al.  Danish and Norwegian wind industry: The relationship between policy instruments, innovation and diffusion , 2006 .

[13]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[14]  U. Cantner,et al.  Change, transformation and development , 2003 .

[15]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[16]  David Toke,et al.  Explaining wind power planning outcomes:: some findings from a study in England and Wales , 2005 .

[17]  S. Shaw,et al.  Enabling offshore wind developments , 2002 .