An improved production-theoretical approach to decomposing carbon dioxide emissions.

Production-theoretical decomposition analysis (PDA), built on production theory and data envelopment analysis, has been widely used to quantify the factors that drive CO2 emission changes to support policy analysis and making. Existing PDA methods are usually linked to Shephard distance function and Malmquist productivity index. However, decomposition results associated with these methods may be biased and incomplete. The challenges with these methods mainly stem from the problems associated with underestimating disaggregated efficiencies and the infeasibility of linear programming. This paper proposes a modified PDA approach based on a non-radial directional distance function and global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. This new approach addresses the problems associated with conventional PDA methods. To show the usefulness of the proposed approach, we apply it to study CO2 emissions in China and use the bootstrap method to test the statistical significance of the estimated results.

[1]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[2]  Benjamin Hampf,et al.  Measuring environmentally sensitive productivity growth: : An application to the urban water sector , 2015 .

[3]  Yongming Han,et al.  Carbon emission analysis and evaluation of industrial departments in China: An improved environmental DEA cross model based on information entropy. , 2018, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  John S. Liu,et al.  Research fronts in data envelopment analysis , 2016 .

[5]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Constructing meaningful environmental indices: A nonparametric frontier approach , 2017 .

[6]  Wenchao Zhou,et al.  Firm performance and the role of environmental management. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Yung‐ho Chiu,et al.  Driving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: A modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis , 2015 .

[8]  Miao Wang,et al.  Understanding China's industrial CO2 emissions: A comprehensive decomposition framework , 2017 .

[9]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[10]  F. Shi,et al.  Realizing low-carbon development in a developing and industrializing region: Impacts of industrial structure change on CO2 emissions in southwest China. , 2019, Journal of environmental management.

[11]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[12]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  Contributions to sector-level carbon intensity change: An integrated decomposition analysis , 2018 .

[13]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[14]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  The good, the bad and the technology : endogeneity in environmental production models , 2016 .

[15]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[16]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  International comparison of industrial CO2 emission trends and the energy efficiency paradox utilizing production-based decomposition , 2012 .

[17]  Diego Prior,et al.  Environmental externalities and efficiency measurement. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decomposing Aggregate CO2 Emission Changes with Heterogeneity: An Extended Production-theoretical Approach , 2018 .

[19]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: A production-theoretical approach , 2008 .

[20]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data: A comparison of parametric, non-parametric and semi-parametric methods with bootstrapping , 1992 .

[21]  Daniel Tyteca,et al.  On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective , 1996 .

[22]  J. Pastor,et al.  A global Malmquist productivity index , 2005 .

[23]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  MULTILATERAL COMPARISONS OF OUTPUT, INPUT, AND PRODUCTIVITY USING SUPERLATIVE INDEX NUMBERS* , 1982 .

[24]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Operational and environmental performance in China's thermal power industry: Taking an effectiveness measure as complement to an efficiency measure. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  Chih-Hung Tsai,et al.  Using the DEA-R model in the hospital industry to study the pseudo-inefficiency problem , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Qiao-Mei Liang,et al.  Changes to pollutants and carbon emission multipliers in China 2007-2012: An input-output structural decomposition analysis. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[27]  Carl A. Pasurka,et al.  Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework , 2006 .

[28]  Oleg Badunenko,et al.  A Drive up the Capital Coast? Contributions to Post-Reform Growth Across Chinese Provinces , 2007 .

[29]  Man Li,et al.  Decomposing the change of CO2 emissions in China: A distance function approach , 2010 .

[30]  Hui Wang,et al.  Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Structural decomposition analysis applied to energy and emissions: Some methodological developments , 2012 .

[32]  中華人民共和国国家統計局 China statistical yearbook , 1988 .

[33]  Léopold Simar,et al.  Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Benjamin Hampf,et al.  Optimal profits under environmental regulation: the benefits from emission intensity averaging , 2017, Ann. Oper. Res..

[35]  Dong-hyun Oh,et al.  A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index , 2010 .