The Role of Nonlinear Gradients in Parallel Imaging: A k-Space Based Analysis.

Sequences that encode the spatial information of an object using nonlinear gradient fields are a new frontier in MRI, with potential to provide lower peripheral nerve stimulation, windowed fields of view, tailored spatially-varying resolution, curved slices that mirror physiological geometry, and, most importantly, very fast parallel imaging with multichannel coils. The acceleration for multichannel images is generally explained by the fact that curvilinear gradient isocontours better complement the azimuthal spatial encoding provided by typical receiver arrays. However, the details of this complementarity have been more difficult to specify. We present a simple and intuitive framework for describing the mechanics of image formation with nonlinear gradients, and we use this framework to review some the main classes of nonlinear encoding schemes.

[1]  Oliver Speck,et al.  Parallel imaging in non-bijective, curvilinear magnetic field gradients: a concept study , 2008, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[2]  Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  A head motion measurement system suitable for emission computed tomography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Yi Wang,et al.  Description of parallel imaging in MRI using multiple coils , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  P M Jakob,et al.  VD‐AUTO‐SMASH imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  Mark R. Morelande,et al.  Performance Analysis for Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Nonlinear Encoding Fields , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  Reconstruction of MRI data encoded with arbitrarily shaped, curvilinear, nonbijective magnetic fields , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Gigi Galiana,et al.  O‐space imaging: Highly efficient parallel imaging using second‐order nonlinear fields as encoding gradients with no phase encoding , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  Localization by nonlinear phase preparation and k‐space trajectory design , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  R Pohmann,et al.  Beyond k-space: spectral localization using higher order gradients. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[10]  Martin Blaimer,et al.  Non‐Cartesian data reconstruction using GRAPPA operator gridding (GROG) , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Martin Blaimer,et al.  General formulation for quantitative G‐factor calculation in GRAPPA reconstructions , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  M. Lustig,et al.  SPIRiT: Iterative self‐consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k‐space , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Mark A. Griswold,et al.  AUTO-SMASH: A self-calibrating technique for SMASH imaging , 1998 .

[15]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  Simultaneously driven linear and nonlinear spatial encoding fields in MRI , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Spread Spectrum Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  Peter M. Jakob,et al.  AUTO-SMASH: A self-calibrating technique for SMASH imaging , 1998, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[18]  Frank J. Rybicki,et al.  Novel encoding technology for ultrafast MRI in a limited spatial region , 1999 .

[19]  L. Wald,et al.  32‐channel 3 Tesla receive‐only phased‐array head coil with soccer‐ball element geometry , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  P. Boesiger,et al.  Electrodynamics and ultimate SNR in parallel MR imaging , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  J. Polimeni,et al.  96‐Channel receive‐only head coil for 3 Tesla: Design optimization and evaluation , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.