Gravity dependence of subjective visual vertical variability.

The brain integrates sensory input from the otolith organs, the semicircular canals, and the somatosensory and visual systems to determine self-orientation relative to gravity. Only the otoliths directly sense the gravito-inertial force vector and therefore provide the major input for perceiving static head-roll relative to gravity, as measured by the subjective visual vertical (SVV). Intraindividual SVV variability increases with head roll, which suggests that the effectiveness of the otolith signal is roll-angle dependent. We asked whether SVV variability reflects the spatial distribution of the otolithic sensors and the otolith-derived acceleration estimate. Subjects were placed in different roll orientations (0-360 degrees, 15 degrees steps) and asked to align an arrow with perceived vertical. Variability was minimal in upright, increased with head-roll peaking around 120-135 degrees, and decreased to intermediate values at 180 degrees. Otolith-dependent variability was modeled by taking into consideration the nonuniform distribution of the otolith afferents and their nonlinear firing rate. The otolith-derived estimate was combined with an internal bias shifting the estimated gravity-vector toward the body-longitudinal. Assuming an efficient otolith estimator at all roll angles, peak variability of the model matched our data; however, modeled variability in upside-down and upright positions was very similar, which is at odds with our findings. By decreasing the effectiveness of the otolith estimator with increasing roll, simulated variability matched our experimental findings better. We suggest that modulations of SVV precision in the roll plane are related to the properties of the otolith sensors and to central computational mechanisms that are not optimally tuned for roll-angles distant from upright.

[1]  H. Mittelstaedt A new solution to the problem of the subjective vertical , 1983, Naturwissenschaften.

[2]  D. Knill,et al.  The Bayesian brain: the role of uncertainty in neural coding and computation , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[3]  Makito Okamoto,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Morphological Aspects of the Human Saccular Macula , 2001, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[4]  Bernhard J. M. Hess,et al.  Influence of dynamic tilts on the perception of earth-vertical , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  A. Pouget,et al.  Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. III. Response dynamics. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  M. Evans Statistical Distributions , 2000 .

[9]  Y. Uchino,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory inputs from saccular afferents to single vestibular neurons in the cat. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  Jan A M Van Gisbergen,et al.  Nature of the transition between two modes of external space perception in tilted subjects. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  H SCHOENE,et al.  ON THE ROLE OF GRAVITY IN HUMAN SPATIAL ORIENTATION. , 1964, Aerospace medicine.

[12]  高木 明 Computer-aided three-dimensional reconstruction and measurement of the vestibular end-organs , 1989 .

[13]  N. Wade The effect of water immersion on perception of the visual vertical. , 1973, British Journal of Psychology.

[14]  F. Mast,et al.  The effect of water immersion on postural and visual orientation. , 1999, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[15]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. I. Response to static tilts and to long-duration centrifugal force. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Human ocular counterroll: assessment of static and dynamic properties from electromagnetic scleral coil recordings , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  A. Pouget,et al.  Efficient computation and cue integration with noisy population codes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  H. Takahashi,et al.  Computer-Aided Three-Dimensional Measurement of the Human Vestibular Apparatus , 1992, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[19]  Jong-Hoon Nam,et al.  Effect of fluid forcing on vestibular hair bundles. , 2005, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[20]  W P Medendorp,et al.  Body-tilt and visual verticality perception during multiple cycles of roll rotation. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Makito Okamoto,et al.  Three-Dimensional Analysis of Morphological Aspects of the Human Utricular Macula , 2003, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[22]  Jean Laurens,et al.  Bayesian processing of vestibular information , 2007, Biological Cybernetics.

[23]  H. A. U. D. Haes Stability of apparent vertical and ocular countertorsion as a function of lateral tilt , 1970 .

[24]  Hermann Aubert,et al.  Eine scheinbare bedeutende Drehung von Objecten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach rechts oder links , 1861, Archiv für pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für klinische Medicin.

[25]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human visual orientation , 1982 .

[26]  Xiaohui Xie Threshold behaviour of the maximum likelihood method in population decoding , 2002, Network.

[27]  E. F. Miller,et al.  Counterrolling of the human eyes produced by head tilt with respect to gravity. , 1962, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[28]  H. Haes,et al.  Perception of gravity-vertical as a function of head and trunk position , 1968, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie.

[29]  Catherine Forbes,et al.  von Mises Distribution , 2010 .

[30]  A M Bronstein,et al.  The perception of body verticality (subjective postural vertical) in peripheral and central vestibular disorders. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  DIRECTIONAL SENSITIVITY OF INDIVIDUAL VERTEBRATE HAIR CELLS TO CONTROLLED DEFLECTION OF THEIR HAIR BUNDLES * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[32]  T. Haslwanter,et al.  The distribution of otolith polarization vectors in mammals: Comparison between model predictions and single cell recordings , 2008, Hearing Research.

[33]  R S Kennedy,et al.  The effect of water immersion on perception of the oculogravic illusion in normal and labyrinthine-defective subjects. , 1968, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[34]  T Haslwanter,et al.  Modeling the relation between head orientations and otolith responses in humans , 2002, Hearing Research.

[35]  Jan A M Van Gisbergen,et al.  Interpretation of a discontinuity in the sense of verticality at large body tilt. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  A. J. Benson,et al.  Thresholds for the detection of the direction of whole-body, linear movement in the horizontal plane. , 1986, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[37]  A. D. Van Beuzekom,et al.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. , 2000 .

[38]  U Rosenhall,et al.  Vestibular Macular Mapping in Man , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[39]  C. Bockisch,et al.  Dissociated hysteresis of static ocular counterroll in humans. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  Marousa Pavlou,et al.  Effect of semicircular canal stimulation on the perception of the visual vertical. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  M. Kendall Theoretical Statistics , 1956, Nature.

[42]  A. Kondrachuk Otoliths as biomechanical gravisensors. , 2002, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[43]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[44]  J. V. Van Gisbergen,et al.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Physiology of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. II. Directional selectivity and force-response relations. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[46]  A. Bronstein,et al.  Horizontal otolith-ocular responses in humans after unilateral vestibular deafferentation , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Wang Lj,et al.  Ocular counterrolling as an indicator of vestibular otolith function , 1999 .

[48]  F. H. Quix The Function of the Vestibular Organ and the Clinical Examination of the Otolithic Apparatus , 1925, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[49]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[50]  W. Abend,et al.  Response to static tilts of peripheral neurons innervating otolith organs of the squirrel monkey. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[51]  I. Curthoys,et al.  The Effect of Ocular Torsional Position on Perception of the Roll-tilt of Visual Stimuli , 1997, Vision Research.

[52]  Hamish G. MacDougall,et al.  Changes in ocular torsion position produced by a single visual line rotating around the line of sight––visual “entrainment” of ocular torsion , 2004, Vision Research.

[53]  S. Lechner-Steinleitner,et al.  Interaction of labyrinthine and somatoreceptor inputs as determinants of the subjective vertical , 1978, Psychological research.

[54]  J Dichgans,et al.  Optokinetic-graviceptive interaction in different head positions. , 1974, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[55]  D L Tomko,et al.  The neural signal of angular head position in primary afferent vestibular nerve axons , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[56]  D. Butts,et al.  Tuning Curves, Neuronal Variability, and Sensory Coding , 2006, PLoS biology.

[57]  I S Curthoys,et al.  The Planes of the Utricular and Saccular Maculae of the Guinea Pig , 1999, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[58]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.