A Mathematical Model to Simulate Intracranial Pressure and Unified Interpretation of Several Disease Entities

BACKGROUND Many clinical phenomena related to cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) and intracranial pressure (ICP) are often contrary to common sense and difficult to explain by classical theory. Such as slit ventricle syndrome, normal intracranial pressure hydrocephalus / low pressure hydrocephalus, paradoxical herniation, and so on. Many authors have different theories about them but can’t have an unified explanation. OBJECTIVE We try to simulate the above CSF disorders and ICP conduction with a mathematical method, and make theoretical interpretations to them. METHODS We introduced a mathematical model based on several well-accepted hypothesesto simulate human CSF physiology and propose that ICP curve should be an U-shaped curve (especially, we introduce the hypothesis that CSF also play a role of decompression). Maple software was used to draw charts according to our formula. We use the theory and intuitive charts to explain those illnesses one by one. RESULTS The formula: ICP = μ · MAP − δ · Vα · μ · MAP + θ · Vβ · μ · MAP + C, and corresponding diagrams was conducted. CONCLUSION This mathematical model is a supplement to the classical Monro-Kellie’s theory, the curve and coordinate system can be used to analyze different pathophysiological states and give a reasonable unified explanation to them.

[1]  Shlomi Constantini,et al.  Modified bilateral subtemporal decompression for resistant slit ventricle syndrome , 2010, Child's Nervous System.

[2]  J. Drake Slit-ventricle syndrome. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  D A Bruce,et al.  The slit ventricle syndrome. , 2001, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[4]  Marek Czosnyka,et al.  Combined Intracranial Pressure Monitoring and Cerebrospinal Fluid Infusion Study to Guide Management of Slit Ventricle Syndrome , 2014, Pediatric Neurosurgery.

[5]  Shizuo Oi,et al.  Proposal of “evolution theory in cerebrospinal fluid dynamics” and minor pathway hydrocephalus in developing immature brain , 2006, Child's Nervous System.

[6]  Jeffrey Weinzweig,et al.  Cranial Vault Expansion in the Management of Postshunt Craniosynostosis and Slit Ventricle Syndrome , 2008, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[7]  K. Guppy,et al.  Sinking Skin Flaps, Paradoxical Herniation, and External Brain Tamponade: A Review of Decompressive Craniectomy Management , 2008, Neurocritical care.

[8]  James M Drake,et al.  The surgical management of pediatric hydrocephalus. , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[9]  Matthias Schulz,et al.  Long-term survival rates of gravity-assisted, adjustable differential pressure valves in infants with hydrocephalus. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Pediatrics.

[10]  Sandhya Mangalore,et al.  Solving the Riddle of “Idiopathic” in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension and Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus: An Imaging Study of the Possible Mechanisms – Monro–Kellie 3.0 , 2019, Asian journal of neurosurgery.

[11]  Etsuro Mori,et al.  [Hypothesis of cerebrospinal fluid formation and absorption: from the clinical viewpoint of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus]. , 2014, Rinsho shinkeigaku = Clinical neurology.

[12]  Lisa A Carey,et al.  Current Treatment Paradigms for the Management of Patients with Brain Metastases , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[13]  Yanjun Zeng,et al.  Effective treatment via early cranioplasty for intractable contralateral subdural effusion after standard decompressive craniectomy in patients with severe traumatic brain injury , 2016, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[14]  Anil Nanda,et al.  The Historical Evolution of Intracranial Pressure Monitoring. , 2020, World neurosurgery.

[15]  Per Kristian Eide,et al.  Is ventriculomegaly in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus associated with a transmantle gradient in pulsatile intracranial pressure? , 2010, Acta Neurochirurgica.