Ten-year survey of cyanobacterial blooms in Ohio's waterbodies using satellite remote sensing.

Cyanobacterial blooms are on the rise globally and are capable of adversely impacting human, animal, and ecosystem health. Blooms dominated by cyanobacteria species capable of toxin-production are commonly observed in eutrophic freshwater. The presence of cyanobacterial blooms in selected Ohio lakes, such as Lake Erie and Grand Lake St. Marys, has been well studied, but much less is known about the geographic distribution of these blooms across all of Ohio's waterbodies. We examined the geographic distribution of cyanobacterial blooms in Ohio's waterbodies from 2002 to 2011, using a nested semi-empirical algorithm and remotely sensed data from the Medium Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MERIS) onboard the European Space Agency's Envisat. We identified: 62 lakes, reservoirs, and ponds; 7 rivers; 6 marshes and wetlands; and 3 quarries with detectable cyanobacteria pigment (phycocyanin) concentrations. Of the 78 waterbodies identified in our study, roughly half (54%; n=42) have any reported in situ microcystins monitoring results from state monitoring programs. Further, 90% of the waterbodies identified reached phycocyanin pigment concentrations representative of levels potentially hazardous to public health. This gap in lakes potentially impacted by cyanobacterial blooms and those that are currently monitored presents an important area of concern for public health, as well as ecosystem health, where unknown human and animal exposures to cyanotoxins may occur in many of Ohio's waterbodies. Our approach may be replicated in other regions around the globe with potential cyanobacterial bloom presence, in order to assess the intensity, geographic distribution, and temporal pattern of blooms in lakes not currently monitored for the presence of cyanobacterial blooms.

[1]  Jamie Bartram,et al.  SAFE LEVELS AND SAFE PRACTICES , 1999 .

[2]  Hans W. Paerl,et al.  Harmful Cyanobacterial Blooms: Causes, Consequences, and Controls , 2013, Microbial Ecology.

[3]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Cyanobacteria blooms and non-alcoholic liver disease: evidence from a county level ecological study in the United States , 2015, Environmental Health.

[4]  Z. Yu,et al.  Relative importance of Microcystis abundance and diversity in determining microcystin dynamics in Lake Erie coastal wetland and downstream beach water , 2016, Journal of applied microbiology.

[5]  H. Paerl,et al.  Climate change: a catalyst for global expansion of harmful cyanobacterial blooms. , 2009, Environmental microbiology reports.

[6]  Blahoslav Maršálek,et al.  Toxins produced in cyanobacterial water blooms – toxicity and risks , 2009, Interdisciplinary toxicology.

[7]  V. Paul,et al.  Toxin release in response to oxidative stress and programmed cell death in the cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa. , 2006, Aquatic toxicology.

[8]  Hee-Mock Oh,et al.  Alternative alert system for cyanobacterial bloom, using phycocyanin as a level determinant. , 2007, Journal of microbiology.

[9]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[10]  Gregory L Boyer,et al.  Health impacts from cyanobacteria harmful algae blooms: Implications for the North American Great Lakes. , 2016, Harmful algae.

[11]  Stefan G. H. Simis,et al.  Remote sensing of the cyanobacterial pigment phycocyanin in turbid inland water , 2005 .

[12]  Song Liang,et al.  Toxin-producing cyanobacteria in freshwater: A review of the problems, impact on drinking water safety, and efforts for protecting public health , 2013, Journal of Microbiology.