The ability of four frailty screening instruments to predict mortality, hospitalization and dependency in (instrumental) activities of daily living

The aim of this study was to assess the predictive ability of the frailty phenotype (FP), Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI), Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and frailty index (FI) for the outcomes mortality, hospitalization and increase in dependency in (instrumental) activities of daily living ((I)ADL) among older persons. This prospective cohort study with 2-year follow-up included 2420 Dutch community-dwelling older people (65+, mean age 76.3 ± 6.6 years, 39.5% male) who were pre-frail or frail according to the FP. Mortality data were obtained from Statistics Netherlands. All other data were self-reported. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) was calculated for each frailty instrument and outcome measure. The prevalence of frailty, sensitivity and specificity were calculated using cutoff values proposed by the developers and cutoff values one above and one below the proposed ones (0.05 for FI). All frailty instruments poorly predicted mortality, hospitalization and (I)ADL dependency (AUCs between 0.62–0.65, 0.59–0.63 and 0.60–0.64, respectively). Prevalence estimates of frailty in this population varied between 22.2% (FP) and 64.8% (TFI). The FP and FI showed higher levels of specificity, whereas sensitivity was higher for the GFI and TFI. Using a different cutoff point considerably changed the prevalence, sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, the predictive ability of the FP, GFI, TFI and FI was poor for all outcomes in a population of pre-frail and frail community-dwelling older people. The FP and the FI showed higher values of specificity, whereas sensitivity was higher for the GFI and TFI.

[1]  R. Gobbens,et al.  The predictive validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: disability, health care utilization, and quality of life in a population at risk. , 2012, The Gerontologist.

[2]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Fried phenotype of frailty: cross-sectional comparison of three frailty stages on various health domains , 2015, BMC Geriatrics.

[3]  Kenneth Rockwood,et al.  Prevalence and 10‐Year Outcomes of Frailty in Older Adults in Relation to Deficit Accumulation , 2010, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[4]  Sathya Karunananthan,et al.  The Identification of Frailty: A Systematic Literature Review , 2011, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[5]  N. Steverink,et al.  Measuring frailty: Developing and testing the GFI (Groningen frailty indicator). , 2001 .

[6]  Cheryl Tatano Beck,et al.  Resource Manual for Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice , 2011 .

[7]  W. J. Mulder,et al.  The Maastricht Frailty Screening Tool for Hospitalised Patients (MFST‐HP) to Identify Non‐Frail Patients , 2017, International journal of clinical practice.

[8]  T. Gill,et al.  A standard procedure for creating a frailty index , 2008, BMC geriatrics.

[9]  K. Liang,et al.  Subtypes of physical frailty: Latent class analysis and associations with clinical characteristics and outcomes , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  H. D. de Vet,et al.  Can resources moderate the impact of levels of frailty on adverse outcomes among (pre-) frail older people? A longitudinal study , 2017, BMC Geriatrics.

[11]  Katrien G Luijkx,et al.  The Tilburg Frailty Indicator: psychometric properties. , 2010, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[12]  C. Stehouwer,et al.  The frailty dilemma. Review of the predictive accuracy of major frailty scores. , 2012, European journal of internal medicine.

[13]  Erik Buskens,et al.  Measurement properties of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. , 2012, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[14]  L. Fried,et al.  Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. , 2001, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[15]  B. Lesourd,et al.  Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: A systematic review , 2012, Geriatrics & gerontology international.

[16]  P. Whincup,et al.  Ability of Self-Reported Frailty Components to Predict Incident Disability, Falls, and All-Cause Mortality: Results From a Population-Based Study of Older British Men , 2017, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association.

[17]  A. Mitnitski,et al.  Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[18]  Kenneth Rockwood,et al.  Accumulation of Deficits as a Proxy Measure of Aging , 2001, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[19]  A. Mitnitski,et al.  A comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. , 2007, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[20]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  University of Groningen THE PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THREE SELF-REPORT SCREENING INSTRUMENTS FOR IDENTIFYING FRAIL OLDER PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY , 2017 .

[21]  K. Markides,et al.  Frailty and 10-Year Mortality in Community-Living Mexican American Older Adults , 2009, Gerontology.

[22]  Mattijs E Numans,et al.  Prediction of adverse health outcomes in older people using a frailty index based on routine primary care data. , 2013, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[23]  L. D. de Witte,et al.  The predictive validity of three self-report screening instruments for identifying frail older people in the community , 2012, BMC Public Health.

[24]  J. Morley,et al.  A Comparison of Four Frailty Models , 2014, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[25]  H. Boter,et al.  Prevalence of Frailty in Community‐Dwelling Older Persons: A Systematic Review , 2012, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[26]  S. Patten,et al.  Comparing frailty measures in their ability to predict adverse outcome among older residents of assisted living , 2012, BMC Geriatrics.

[27]  Matteo Cesari,et al.  The frailty phenotype and the frailty index: different instruments for different purposes. , 2014, Age and ageing.

[28]  Siegwart Lindenberg,et al.  Old or frail: what tells us more? , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[29]  E. Hoogendijk,et al.  Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: A review. , 2016, European journal of internal medicine.

[30]  Silvina Santana,et al.  Predicting risk and outcomes for frail older adults: an umbrella review of frailty screening tools , 2017, JBI database of systematic reviews and implementation reports.

[31]  W. Saris,et al.  Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[32]  F. Timmins Nursing Research Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice , 2013 .

[33]  Kenneth Rockwood,et al.  Operationalization of Frailty Using Eight Commonly Used Scales and Comparison of Their Ability to Predict All‐Cause Mortality , 2013, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[34]  E. Roughead,et al.  Predictive performance of four frailty measures in an older Australian population. , 2015, Age and ageing.

[35]  J Ormel,et al.  The assessment of disability with the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale. Conceptual framework and psychometric properties. , 1996, Social science & medicine.

[36]  C. Paúl,et al.  Portuguese version of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator: Transcultural adaptation and psychometric validation , 2015, Geriatrics & gerontology international.