Exergo-Environmental Optimization of a Diesel Engine

Abstract Currently, more than half of the road transport fleet uses diesel engines, which are often identified as the primary source of air pollution. This parameter is enough to optimize engine performance and emissions. The engine optimization can be done using several methods, the most notably by modifying the engine structure, changing the type of fuel using additives and biofuels, or achieving the optimal operating range of the engine. Modifying the engine structure and addition of different kinds of materials to optimize fuel is not recommended either due to necessity of vast time input, financial resources, or extensive research. However, the third way to achieve optimal engine performance conditions can be the most accessible option. According to the results, the best operational load for diesel engine is approx. 94–95% of the full load from the multi-objective optimization point of view, indicating that the optimum load can be achieved before the full load condition. At this point, the operator can achieve the brake power of 198.45 kW and brake thermal efficiency of 40.7% in the presence of brake specific fuel consumption of 0.226 kg·kWh−1. At this condition, CO2 emission is 124.85 g·kWh−1, NOx emission 7.34 g·kWh−1, CO emission 0.6 g·kWh−1, unburnt hydrocarbon emission approx. 0.009 g·kWh−1, and soot formation approx. 0.006 g·kWh−1. This point is equal to the exergy efficiency of approx. 35% and the exergy destruction of approx. 45%. In terms of endpoint results, this condition achieved the impact indices of 7.96E-007 in terms of human health, 0.105 PDF·m2·yr. in terms of ecosystem quality, 0.24 kg CO2 eq. in terms of climate change, and 12.96 MJ in terms of resources.

[1]  M. Aghbashlo,et al.  Performance and emission analysis of a dual-fuel engine operating on high natural gas substitution rates ignited by aqueous carbon nanoparticles-laden diesel/biodiesel emulsions , 2021 .

[2]  R. Pourdarbani,et al.  Modelling the Effects of Al2O3-SiO2 Nanocomposite Additive in Biodiesel–Diesel Fuel on Diesel Engine Performance Using Hybrid ANN-ABC , 2021 .

[3]  D. Yuvarajan,et al.  Ignition study of neat biodiesel in dual fueled research engine , 2020 .

[4]  Suresh Vellaiyan,et al.  Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticle as an additive on the exhaust characteristics of diesel-water emulsion fuel blends , 2019, Petroleum Science and Technology.

[5]  O. Ogunkunle,et al.  A review of global current scenario of biodiesel adoption and combustion in vehicular diesel engines , 2019, Energy Reports.

[6]  Alper Bideci,et al.  Environmental performance analysis of insulated composite facade panels using life cycle assessment (LCA) , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[7]  Chuangzhi Wu,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biofuels in China: Status and challenges , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[8]  Y. Devarajan,et al.  Performance, emission and combustion study on neat biodiesel and water blends fuelled research diesel engine , 2018, Heat and Mass Transfer.

[9]  R. Pourdarbani,et al.  Theoretical study to determine the proper injection system for upgrading fuel system of diesel engine om357 to common rail system , 2018, International Journal of Engineering & Technology.

[10]  P. Ramakrishnan,et al.  Optimization in the performance and emission parameters of a DI diesel engine fuelled with pentanol added Calophyllum inophyllum/diesel blends using response surface methodology , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[11]  Mortaza Aghbashlo,et al.  A novel emulsion fuel containing aqueous nano cerium oxide additive in diesel–biodiesel blends to improve diesel engines performance and reduce exhaust emissions: Part I – Experimental analysis , 2017 .

[12]  Gianluca Cicala,et al.  Recycling treatment of carbon fibre/epoxy composites: Materials recovery and characterization and environmental impacts through life cycle assessment , 2016 .

[13]  U. Saha,et al.  Experimental evaluation of a rice bran biodiesel – biogas run dual fuel diesel engine at varying compression ratios , 2016 .

[14]  Haji Hassan Masjuki,et al.  Effects of biodiesel from different feedstocks on engine performance and emissions: A review , 2015 .

[15]  Byungchul Choi,et al.  Effect of diesel fuel blend with n-butanol on the emission of a turbocharged common rail direct injection diesel engine , 2015 .

[16]  Chandan Kumar,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF VCR DIESEL ENGINE FUELLED BY N-BUTANOL DIESEL BLEND , 2015 .

[17]  Francisco M. Vigil,et al.  Potential use of a blend of diesel, biodiesel, alcohols and vegetable oil in compression ignition engines , 2014 .

[18]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Assessing resource depletion in LCA: a review of methods and methodological issues , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[19]  Yu-Cheng Chang,et al.  Green energy: Water-containing acetone–butanol–ethanol diesel blends fueled in diesel engines , 2013 .

[20]  S. Bari Diesel Engine - Combustion, Emissions and Condition Monitoring , 2013 .

[21]  P. Van den Heede,et al.  Environmental impact and life cycle assessment (LCA) of traditional and ‘green’ concretes: Literature review and theoretical calculations , 2012 .

[22]  Barat Ghobadian,et al.  Performance and emission characteristics of a CI engine using graphene oxide (GO) nano-particles additives in biodiesel-diesel blends , 2020 .

[23]  Juha Heikkilä,et al.  Diesel exhaust emissions and particle hygroscopicity with HVO fuel-oxygenate blend , 2013 .

[24]  K. Mollenhauer,et al.  Handbook of Diesel Engines , 2010 .